Help


from Wikipedia
« »  
David Weir has argued in Anarchy and Culture that anarchism only had some success in the sphere of cultural avant-gardism because of its failure as a political movement ; cognizant of anarchism's claims to overcome the barrier between art and political activism, he nevertheless suggests that this is not achieved in reality.
Weir suggests that for the " ideologue " it might be possible to adapt " aesthetics to politics ", but that " from the perspective of the poet " a solution might be to " adapt the politics to the aesthetics ".
He identifies this latter strategy with anarchism, on account of its individualism.
Weir has also suggested that " the contemporary critical strategy of aestheticizing politics " among Marxists such as Fredric Jameson results from the demise of Marxism as a state ideology.
" The situation whereby ideology attempts to operate outside of politics has already pointed Marxism toward postmodernist culture, just as anarchism moved into the culture of modernism when it ceased to have political validity ".

1.908 seconds.