Page "Appellate procedure in the United States" Paragraph 21
from
Wikipedia
Because constitutional claims are of great magnitude, appellate courts might be more lenient to review the claim even if it was not preserved.
For example Connecticut applies the following standard to review unpreserved claims: 1. the record is adequate to review the alleged claim of error ; 2. the claim is of constitutional magnitude alleging the violation of a fundamental right ; 3. the alleged constitutional violation clearly exists and clearly deprived the defendant of a fair trial ; 4. if subject to harmless error analysis, the state has failed to demonstrate harmlessness of the alleged constitutional violation beyond a reasonable doubt.
Page 1 of 1.
2.479 seconds.