Help


from Wikipedia
« »  
Maimonides challenged the inductive assertion on that " everything in existence comes from a substratum ," on that basis that his reliance on induction and analogy is a fundamentally flawed means of explaining unobserved phenomenon.
According to Maimonides, to argue that " because I have never observed something coming into existence without coming from a substratum it cannot occur " is equivalent to arguing that " because I cannot empirically observe eternity it does not exist.

2.067 seconds.