Page "Edmund Gettier" Paragraph 3

Gettier provides several examples of beliefs that are both true and justified, but that we should not intuitively call knowledge.

Cases of this sort are now called " Gettier ( counter -) examples.

" Because Gettier's criticism of the Justified True Belief model is systemic, a cottage industry has sprung up around imagining increasingly fantastical counterexamples.

For example, I am watching the men's Wimbledon Final and John McEnroe is playing Jimmy Connors, it is match point, and McEnroe wins.

I say to myself " John McEnroe is this year's men's champion at Wimbledon ".

Unbeknownst to me, however, the BBC were experiencing a broadcasting fault and so had stuck in a tape of last year's final, when McEnroe also beat Connors.

I had been watching last year's Wimbledon final so I believed that McEnroe had beaten Connors.

But at that same time, in real life, McEnroe was repeating last year's victory and beating Connors!

So my belief that McEnroe beat Connors to become this year's Wimbledon champion is true, and I had good reason to believe so ( my belief was justified )— and yet, there is a sense in which I could not really have claimed to ' know ' that McEnroe had beaten Connors because I was only accidentally right that McEnroe beat Connors — my belief was not based on the right kind of justification.