Page "Irreducible complexity" Paragraph 64

It is illustrative to compare a mousetrap with a cat, in this context.

Both normally function so as to control the mouse population.

The cat has many parts that can be removed leaving it still functional ; for example, its tail can be bobbed, or it can lose an ear in a fight.

Comparing the cat and the mousetrap, then, one sees that the mousetrap ( which is not alive ) offers better evidence, in terms of irreducible complexity, for intelligent design than the cat.

Even looking at the mousetrap analogy, several critics have described ways in which the parts of the mousetrap could have independent uses or could develop in stages, demonstrating that it is not irreducibly complex.