Page "Legal personality" Paragraph 25
from
Wikipedia
In part as a matter of subsequent interpretations of the word " person " in the Fourteenth Amendment, U. S. courts have extended certain constitutional protections to corporations.
Opponents of " corporate personhood " don't necessarily want to eliminate legal entities, but do want to limit these rights to those provided by state constitutions through constitutional amendment.
Often, this is motivated by a desire to restrict the political speech and donations of corporations, lobby groups, lobbyists, and political parties.
Because legal persons have limited " free speech " rights, legislation meant to eliminate campaign contributions by legal persons ( notably, corporations and labor unions ) has been repeatedly struck down by various courts.
On January 21, 2010, the Supreme Court of the United States, deciding Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission by a 5-4 majority, removed restrictions on some types of corporate spending in support of ( or in opposition to ) specific candidates.
Page 1 of 1.
1.870 seconds.