Page "Mulan" Paragraph 27

Reception of Mulan was mostly positive, gathering a 86 % fresh rating from Rotten Tomatoes.

Additionally, the film was ranked twenty-fourth out of the fifty canon Disney animated features in a 2009 countdown at the same website.

Kyle Suggs described the visuals as " breathtaking ," and Dan Jardine described the visuals as " magnificently animated.

" Film critic Roger Ebert gave Mulan three and a half stars out of four in his written review.

He said that " Mulan is an impressive achievement, with a story and treatment ranking with Beauty and the Beast and The Lion King ".

Negative reviews described it as a " disappointment.

" The songs are accused of not being memorable, and slowing down the pace of the movie.

Some reviewers suggest that the film is " soulless " in its portrayal of Asian society.