Page "Naturalistic fallacy" Paragraph 19

Some scientists and philosophers reject the Naturalistic Fallacy, arguing that it is indeed possible to derive " ought " from " is ", and even that it has already been done to some extent.

Proponents of this view, such as the author and neuroscientist Sam Harris, see morality as a budding science.

This view is critical of Moore's " simple indefinable terms " ( which amount to qualia ), arguing instead that such terms actually can be broken down into constituents.