Page "Prehistoric Britain" Paragraph 20

It is generally thought that by 500 BC most people inhabiting the British Isles were speaking Common Brythonic, on the limited evidence of place-names recorded by Pytheas of Massalia and transmitted to us second-hand, largely through Strabo.

Certainly by the Roman period there is substantial place-and personal name evidence which suggests that this was so ; Tacitus also states in his Agricola that the British language differed little from that of the Gauls.

However, it has been suggested that a form of English may have been spoken in Eastern Britain at this date ; this theory is not widely accepted.

Among these people were skilled craftsmen who had begun producing intricately patterned gold jewellery, in addition to tools and weapons of both bronze and iron.

It is disputed whether Iron Age Britons were " Celts ", with some academics such as John Collis and Simon James actively opposing the idea of ' Celtic Britain ', since the term was only applied at this time to a tribe in Gaul.

However, placenames and tribal names from the later part of the period suggest that a Celtic language was spoken.

The traveller Pytheas, whose own works are lost, was quoted by later classical authors as calling the people " Pretanoi ", which is cognate with " Britanni " and is apparently Celtic in origin.

The term " Celtic " continues to be used by linguists to describe the family that includes many of the ancient languages of Western Europe and modern British languages such as Welsh without controversy.

The dispute essentially revolves around how the word " Celtic " is defined ; it is clear from the archaeological and historical record that Iron Age Britain did have much in common with Iron Age Gaul, but there were also many differences.

Many leading academics, such as Barry Cunliffe, still use the term to refer to the pre-Roman inhabitants of Britain for want of a better label.