Help


from Wikipedia
« »  
Following Restoration of the monarchy in 1660 the issue of parliamentary reform lay dormant until it was revived in the 1760s by the Whig Prime Minister William Pitt, 1st Earl of Chatham (" Pitt the Elder "), who called borough representation " the rotten part of our Constitution " ( hence the term " rotten borough ").
Nevertheless, he did not advocate an immediate disfranchisement of rotten boroughs.
He instead proposed that a third member be added to each county, to countervail the borough influence.
The Whigs failed to unite behind the expansion of county representation ; some objected to the idea because they felt that it would give too much power to the aristocracy and gentry in rural areas.
Ultimately, despite Chatham's exertions, Parliament took no action on his proposals.
The cause of parliamentary reform was next taken up by Lord Chatham's son, William Pitt the Younger ( variously described as a Tory and as an " independent Whig ").
Like his father, he shrank from proposing the wholesale abolition of the rotten boroughs, advocating instead an increase in county representation.
The House of Commons rejected Pitt's resolution by over 140 votes, despite receiving petitions for reform bearing over twenty thousand signatures.
In 1783, Pitt became Prime Minister but was still unable to achieve reform.
King George III was averse to the idea, as were many members of Pitt's own cabinet.
In 1786, the Prime Minister proposed a reform bill, but the House of Commons rejected it on a 174 – 248 vote.
Pitt did not raise the issue again for the remainder of his term.

1.812 seconds.