Page "Sinbad and the Eye of the Tiger" Paragraph 21

Reviewer Lawrence Van Gelder, writing for New York Times, called the acting " rudimentary ", but found the movie enjoyable: "... this latest Sinbad adventure maintains the innocent and atavistic juvenile charm of the others in the series.

" Reviewer Lorna Sutton said the film was " pure escapist entertainment which doesn't require serious analysis or criticism.

" She found the film enjoyable, despite its flaws.

" The plot is familiar, the characters are predictable and dialogue is trite.

But the action and the special effects provide for a fast-paced two hours of entertainment.