Help


from Wikipedia
« »  
The argument further states that meta-ethical relativists, by contrast, cannot condemn theft, rape or genocide ( nor commend generosity, marriage, or the preservation of life ) without relying on the assumption of an objective source for morality.
No moral assertions, it is argued, can be explained by the relativist's own worldview ; they are instead derived from unconsciously " borrowed capital " from Christianity, proving the truth of the Christian worldview.

2.145 seconds.