Page "lore" Paragraph 68
from
Brown Corpus
We may conclude that all six points of information, ostensibly given by the dream priest, could have been furnished by Dr. Hilprecht's subconscious reasoning.
But, in denying any physical reality for this dream, how could the brain possibly compose that realistic, vividly visual continuity uninterrupted by misty fadeout, violent break or sudden substitution??
Which theory is more fantastic: 1.
That the perfect continuity was composed from the joblot of memory impressions in the professor's brain, or 2.
That the dream was a reality on the infinite progressions of universal, gradient frequencies, across which the modern professor and the priest of ancient Nippur met??
Page 1 of 1.
2.011 seconds.