[permalink] [id link]
* Tarski's axioms: Alfred Tarski ( 1902 – 1983 ) and his students defined elementary Euclidean geometry as the geometry that can be expressed in first-order logic and does not depend on set theory for its logical basis, in contrast to Hilbert's axioms, which involve point sets.
from
Wikipedia
Some Related Sentences
Tarski's and axioms
Today's student of geometry has axioms other than Euclid's available: see Hilbert's axioms and Tarski's axioms.
Other often-used axiomizations of plane geometry are Hilbert's axioms and Tarski's axioms.
Hilbert's axioms, unlike Tarski's axioms, do not constitute a first-order theory because the axioms V. 1 – 2 cannot be expressed in first-order logic.
Tarski's axioms, due to Alfred Tarski, are an axiom set for the substantial fragment of Euclidean geometry, called " elementary ," that is formulable in first-order logic with identity, and requiring no set theory.
In fact the length of all of Tarski's axioms together is not much more than just one of Pieri's 24 axioms.
The only notion from intuitive geometry invoked in the remarks to Tarski's axioms is triangle.
Tarski's and Alfred
This result, known as Tarski's undefinability theorem, was discovered independently by Gödel ( when he was working on the proof of the incompleteness theorem ) and by Alfred Tarski.
The analysis of logical concepts and the machinery of formalization that is essential to Principia Mathematica ( 3 vols., 1910 – 1913 ) ( by Bertrand Russell, 1872 – 1970, and Alfred North Whitehead, 1861 – 1947 ), to Russell's theory of descriptions, to Kurt Gödel's ( 1906 – 1978 ) incompleteness theorems, and to Alfred Tarski's ( 1901 – 1983 ) theory of truth, is ultimately due to Frege.
This result, known as Tarski's undefinability theorem, was discovered independently by Gödel ( when he was working on the proof of the incompleteness theorem ) and by Alfred Tarski.
* W. J. Blok and Don Pigozzi, " Alfred Tarski's Work on General Metamathematics ", The Journal of Symbolic Logic, v. 53, No. 1 ( Mar., 1988 ), pp. 36 – 50.
Tarski's circle-squaring problem is the challenge, posed by Alfred Tarski in 1925, to take a disc in the plane, cut it into finitely many pieces, and reassemble the pieces so as to get a square of equal area.
In mathematics, the Tarski's theorem, proved by Alfred Tarski, states that in ZF the theorem " For every infinite set A, there is a bijective map between the sets A and A × A " implies the axiom of choice.
* Formal theories of truth such as used in formal logic and mathematics, as well as Alfred Tarski's semantic theory of truth and Saul Kripke's theories of truth.
Tarski's undefinability theorem, stated and proved by Alfred Tarski in 1936, is an important limitative result in mathematical logic, the foundations of mathematics, and in formal semantics.
Soon after Alfred Tarski joined Berkeley's mathematics department in 1942, Robinson began to do major work on the foundations of mathematics, building on Tarski's concept of " essential undecidability ," by proving a number of mathematical theories undecidable.
* Model-theoretic semantics is the archetype of Alfred Tarski's semantic theory of truth, based on his T-schema, and is one of the founding concepts of model theory.
The T-schema or truth schema ( not to be confused with ' Convention T ') is used to give an inductive definition of truth which lies at the heart of any realisation of Alfred Tarski's semantic theory of truth.
This result is often attributed to Alfred Tarski, but Tarski's fixed point theorem pertains to monotone functions on complete lattices.
His first work was a commentary on Alfred Tarski's theory of truth, which he has worked on since 1972.
In addition, he constructed the theory of quasi-truth that constitutes a generalization of Alfred Tarski's theory of truth, and applied it to the foundations of science.
A consequence of this axiom is that Alfred Tarski's proof of the decidability of the ordered real field could be seen as an algorithm to solve any problem in Euclidean geometry.
* Givant, Steven ( 1999 ) " Unifying threads in Alfred Tarski's Work ", Mathematical Intelligencer 21: 47 – 58.
Tarski's and Tarski
Tarski's lecture at the 1950 International Congress of Mathematicians in Cambridge ushered in a new period in which model-theoretic aspects were developed, mainly by Tarski himself, as well as C. C.
However, the methods developed by Frege and Tarski for the study of mathematical language have been extended greatly by Tarski's student Richard Montague and other linguists working in formal semantics to show that the distinction between mathematical language and natural language may not be as great as it seems.
It was Tarski who stated the result in its most general form, and so the theorem is often known as Tarski's fixed point theorem.
* Relation algebra, invented by DeMorgan, and developed by Charles Sanders Peirce, Ernst Schröder, Tarski, and Tarski's students.
* Tarski's undefinability theorem ( Gödel and Tarski in the 1930s )
We will first state a simplified version of Tarski's theorem, then state and prove in the next section the theorem Tarski actually proved in 1936.
Tarski's axiomatization is shorter than its rivals, in a sense Tarski and Givant ( 1999 ) make explicit.
Tarski's and students
Montague, one of Tarski's most accomplished American students, spent his entire career teaching in the UCLA Department of Philosophy, where he supervised the dissertations of Nino Cocchiarella and Hans Kamp.
Tarski's and defined
Ultimately, the reason for this weakening is that whereas the model-theoretic satisfaction relation can be defined, truth itself cannot, due to Tarski's theorem.
But Tarski's approach was extended by Davidson into an approach to theories of meaning for natural languages, which involves treating " truth " as a primitive, rather than a defined concept.
In fact they only needed the real version of the conjecture, defined below, to prove this result, which would be a positive solution to Tarski's exponential function problem.
Such economy of primitive and defined notions means that Tarski's system is not very convenient for doing Euclidian geometry.
Tarski's and elementary
This is similar to Tarski's free group problem, which asks whether two different non-abelian finitely generated free groups have the same elementary theory.
Tarski's and Euclidean
Like other modern axiomatizations of Euclidean geometry, Tarski's employs a formal system consisting of symbol strings, called sentences, whose construction respects formal syntactical rules, and rules of proof that determine the allowed manipulations of the sentences.
This schema is indispensable ; Euclidean geometry in Tarski's ( or equivalent ) language cannot be finitely axiomatized as a first-order theory.
Tarski's and geometry
: What was different about Tarski's approach to geometry?
Tarski's and can
Unlike the generalized solution to Tarski's circle-squaring problem, the axiom of choice is not required for the proof, and the decomposition and reassembly can actually be carried out " physically "; the pieces can, in theory, be cut with scissors from paper and reassembled by hand.
The sentences whose existence is secured by the diagonal lemma can then, in turn, be used to prove fundamental limitative results such as Gödel's incompleteness theorems and Tarski's indefinability theorem.
Satisfaction is inspired by Tarski's truth definition, but can in fact be any binary relation.
Tarski's system has the unusual property that all sentences can be written in universal-existential form, a special case of the prenex normal form.
0.136 seconds.