[permalink] [id link]
ARCNET, Token Ring and other technology standards have been used in the past, but Ethernet over twisted pair cabling, and Wi-Fi are the two most common technologies currently used to build LANs.
from
Wikipedia
Some Related Sentences
ARCNET and Token
At that time, early LAN systems were just coming to market, including Ethernet, Token Ring and ARCNET.
100VG took advantage of the token passing concept that made ARCNET and Token Ring popular in order to provide consistent performance no matter how large the network became.
Because the token stayed within the hub, it did not have to traverse long cables going to every node as in ARCNET and Token Ring therefore becoming faster than those other deterministic networking standards and being less susceptible to cabling problems, network card failures, and line interference.
ARCNET ( also CamelCased as ARCnet, an acronym from Attached Resource Computer NETwork ) is a local area network ( LAN ) protocol, similar in purpose to Ethernet or Token Ring.
Easier cabling, combined with the greater raw speed of Ethernet (, as compared with for ARCnet ) helped to increase Ethernet demand, and as more companies entered the market the price of Ethernet started to fall — and ARCNET ( and Token Ring ) volumes tapered off.
To mediate access to the bus, ARCNET, like Token Ring, uses a token passing scheme, rather than the carrier sense multiple access approach of Ethernet.
Token Ring has similar qualities, but is much more expensive to implement than ARCNET.
ARCNET and other
Both the workstations and the servers were similar internally, based on Intel 80186 microprocessors, and connected to each other using ARCNET.
ARCNET and standards
With the exception of ARCNET, which was conceived as early as 1975 for office connectivity and later found uses in industry, the majority of fieldbus standards were developed in the 1980s and became fully established in the marketplace during the mid-1990s.
ARCNET and used
Even though ARCNET is now rarely used for new general networks, the diminishing installed base still requires support-and it retains a niche in industrial control.
Original ARCNET used RG-62 / U coax cable of impedance and either passive or active hubs in a star-wired bus topology.
ARCNET coax cable runs could extend between active hubs or between an active hub and an end node, while the RG-58 () ‘ thin ’ Ethernet most widely used at that time was limited to a maximum run of from end to end.
However, because of its simple, robust nature, ARCNET controllers are still sold and used in industrial, embedded, and automotive applications.
ARCNET and Ethernet
ARCNET was less expensive than either, more reliable, more flexible, and by the late 1980s it had a market share about equal to that of Ethernet.
At the time of its greatest popularity, this was a significant advantage of ARCNET over Ethernet.
Another significant advantage ARCNET had over Ethernet was cable distance.
ARCNET had the disadvantage of requiring either an active or passive hub between nodes if there were more than two nodes in the network, while thin Ethernet allowed nodes to be spaced anywhere along the linear coax cable.
Although ARCNET could at one time outperform a Ethernet in a busy office on slow processors, ARCNET ultimately gave way to Ethernet as improved processor speeds reduced the impact of collisions on overall throughput, and Ethernet costs dropped.
In the early 1980s ARCNET was much cheaper than Ethernet, in particular for PCs.
For example in 1985 SMC sold ARCNET cards for around whilst an Ungermann-Bass Ethernet card plus transceiver could cost.
One further advantage that ARCNET enjoyed over collision-based Ethernet is that it guarantees equitable access to the bus by everyone on the network.
In spite of ARCNET's deterministic operation and historic suitability for real-time environments such as process control, the general availability of switched gigabit Ethernet and Quality of service capabilities in Ethernet switches has all but eliminated ARCNET today.
Some ARCNET twisted-pair products supported cable runs over 2000 ' on standard Cat-3 cable, far beyond anything Ethernet could do on any kind of copper cable.
TCNS enjoyed some success until the availability of lower-cost Ethernet put an end to the general deployment of ARCNET as a LAN protocol.
ARCNET and over
As microcomputers took over from the Datapoint, ARCNET was re-purposed as LAN.
As microcomputers took over the industry, well-proven and reliable ARCNET was also offered as an inexpensive LAN for these machines.
* RFC 1201 Transmitting IP Traffic over ARCNET Networks
The BACnet protocol defines a number of data link / physical layers, including ARCNET, Ethernet, BACnet / IP, Point-To-Point over RS-232, Master-Slave / Token-Passing over RS-485, and LonTalk.
ARCNET and are
The most well-known examples are token ring and ARCNET.
ARCNET and most
VINES formed one of a group of XNS-based systems which also included Novell NetWare and ARCNET ; like most of these earlier products it has since disappeared from the market, Banyan along with it.
ARCNET and .
ARCNET was developed by Datapoint Corporation in 1976 and announced in 1977.
Later, some manufacturers of LAN equipment, such as Datapoint for ARCNET, adopted RG-62 as their coaxial cable standard.
ARCNET was the first widely available networking system for microcomputers and became popular in the 1980s for office automation tasks.
ARCNET was developed by principal development engineer John Murphy at Datapoint Corporation in 1976 under Victor Poor, and announced in 1977.
When the number of users outgrew the capacity of the original computer, additional ' compute ' resource computers could be attached via ARCNET, running the same applications and accessing the same data.
ARCNET remained proprietary until the early-to-mid 1980s.
ARCNET was eventually standardized as ANSI ARCNET 878. 1.
It appears this was when the name changed from ARCnet to ARCNET.
Token and Ring
" In January, Jobs announced that they would instead be supporting IBM's Token Ring, which he expected to come out in a " few months ".
By late 1983 it was clear that IBM's Token Ring would not be ready in time for the launch of the Mac, and might miss the launch of these other products as well.
In the end, Token Ring would not ship until October 1985.
Apple also announced that AppleBus networks could be attached to, and would appear to be a single node within, a Token Ring system.
By 1987 Ethernet was clearly winning the standards battle over Token Ring, and in the middle of that year Apple introduced EtherTalk 1. 0 for the newly released Macintosh II computer.
Token Ring would eventually be supported with the similar TokenTalk product, which also used the same Network control panel and underlying software.
Many 3rd party companies would introduce compatible Ethernet and Token Ring cards that used these same drivers.
Ethernet and Token Ring was also supported, known as EtherTalk and TokenTalk respectively.
Ethernet initially competed with two largely proprietary systems, Token Ring and Token Bus.
In addition to CSMA / CD, Token Ring ( supported by IBM ) and Token Bus ( selected and henceforward supported by General Motors ) were also considered as candidates for a LAN standard.
The most widely used standards are for the Ethernet family, Token Ring, Wireless LAN, Bridging and Virtual Bridged LANs.
However shielded twisted pair was used in IBM's Token Ring implementation, and in 1984 StarLAN showed the potential of simple unshielded twisted pair by using Cat3 — the same simple cable used for telephone systems.
Other MultiMate products included foreign language versions of the software ( i. e., " MultiTexto " in Spanish ), a hardware interface card for file-transfer with Wang systems and versions of MultiMate for different PC clone MS-DOS computers, and for use on Novell, 3COM and IBM's PC Token Ring networks.
FDDI was considered an attractive campus backbone technology in the early to mid 1990s since existing Ethernet networks only offered 10 Mbit / s transfer speeds and Token Ring networks only offered 4 Mbit / s or 16 Mbit / s speeds.
Token Ring is a logical ring topology, but is wired a physical star from the Media Access Unit.
In a ring network, such as Token Ring, ring latency is the time required for a signal to propagate once around the ring.
At the time, the company envisioned layer 3 routing and layer 2 ( Ethernet, Token Ring ) switching as complementary functions of different intelligence and architecture – the former was slow and complex, the latter was fast but simple.
IBM responded by proposing Token Ring as an alternative to Ethernet but kept such tight control over standardization that competitors were wary of using it.
0.436 seconds.