The judgement states in relation to the appellant's assertions regarding the claim that his IP address had been disguised: “ These suggestions are fanciful in the extreme.

# if the appellant's rights were violated, whether the evidence ought to be excluded under s. 24 ( 2 ) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

In addition, within four months of notification of the decision, a statement setting out the grounds of appeal ( i. e., the appeal grounds ) must be filed, which must contain the appellant's complete case.

Similarly, Harlan and the Court refused to categorize the speech at issue as a " fighting word " under Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire, because no " individual actually or likely to be present could reasonably have regarded the words on appellant's jacket as a direct personal insult.

The appellant's appeal against sentence was finally disposed of on 2 February 2011 and in such circumstances there did not exist a live appeal in respect of which leave could be granted under section 110 ( 4 ).

An appeal can also be made on the grounds that the adoption of taxation powers by SOCA was invalid in the appellant's case.

:" In our judgment it is permissible and necessary to look at the cumulative effect of these calls, made to numerous ladies on numerous occasions in the case of each lady, and to have regard to the cumulative effect of the calls in determining whether the appellant's conduct constituted a public nuisance.

: the previous trial the appellant's allegations of fact in the pamphlet were divided into 85 extracts and rebutted one by one.

An appeal " by leave " or " permission " requires the appellant to obtain leave to appeal ; in such a situation either or both of the lower court and the appellate court may have the discretion to grant or refuse the appellant's demand to appeal the lower court's decision.

The form is completed by the appellant or by the appellant's legal representative.

Hence, such an appellate court will not consider an appellant's argument if it is based on a theory that is raised for the first time in the appeal.

Until 9 November 1994 when the newspaper published its first articles about him, the appellant's public reputation was unblemished.

In the 1961 case Torcaso v. Watkins, the U. S. Supreme Court unanimously ruled that such language in state constitutions was in violation of the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution, but did not rule on the applicability of Article VI, stating that " Because we are reversing the judgment on other grounds, we find it unnecessary to consider appellant's contention that this provision applies to state as well as federal offices.

" Because we are reversing the judgment on other grounds, we find it unnecessary to consider appellant's contention that this provision applies to state as well as federal offices.

However, they dismissed the appellant's appeal.

As Justice William Brennan stated for the majority, " to condition the availability of benefits upon this appellant's willingness to violate a cardinal principle of her religious faith effectively penalizes the free exercise of her constitutional liberties.

* In October 2009 declined to hear the ramifications of a lawsuit written by Ohio Special Counsel against a sole family provider of care of the appellant's mother.

An appellant's bond to stay execution on a judgment during the pendency of the appeal.

* For a discussion of the appellant's defence and the decision in Sykes above, see P. R. Glazebrook, Misprision of Felony-Shadow or Phantom, The American Journal of Legal History, Volume 8, No. 3 ( July 1964 ) pp. 189-208, Temple University JSTOR

Pervo sees Luke ’ s work as a “ legitimizing narrative ” because it makes “ a case by telling a story ( or stories )” and serves to legitimate either “ Pauline Christianity ( possibly in rivalry to other interpretations ) or generally as the claim of the Jesus-movement to possess the Israelite heritage .” On the other hand, some scholars greatly disagree with the view of legitimation because they believe that it “ mirror-reads ” Luke ’ s work attempting to uncover the circumstances surrounding Luke ’ s work by over-arguing something that may not be that valid.

Cassidy proposed an ‘ allegiance-conduct-witness ’ theory to explain how Luke ’ s purpose lines up with the equipping claim.

On the basis of these traditions, the churches in question often claim to have inherited specific authority, doctrines and / or practices on the authority of their founding apostle ( s ), which is understood to be continued by the bishops of the see ( seat ) or throne of the church that each founded and whose original leader he was.

With Constantine ’ s death in 337, Constans and his two brothers, Constantine II and Constantius II divided the Roman world between themselves, after first deposing of virtually all of the relatives of their father who could possibly have a claim on the throne.

In legal terminology, a complaint is any formal legal document that sets out the facts and legal reasons ( see: cause of action ) that the filing party or parties ( the plaintiff ( s )) believes are sufficient to support a claim against the party or parties against whom the claim is brought ( the defendant ( s )) that entitles the plaintiff ( s ) to a remedy ( either money damages or injunctive relief )

In response to Haeckel ’ s evolutionary claim that all vertebrates are essentially identical in the first month of embryonic life as proof of common descent, His responds by insisting that a more skilled observer would recognize even sooner that early embryos can be distinguished.

Hopkinson ’ s itemized bill, moreover, is the only contemporary claim that exists for creating the American flag.

In September 2010 the Guatemalan Congress overwhelmingly gave its approval for a referendum to be held to give the people of Guatemala a say in whether or not that country ’ s claim to Belize should be taken to the International Court of Justice for final resolution.

While conceding he is sometimes good, the authors claim Burton's " occasional triumphs only serve to highlight the pathetic waste in most of his films ; for every Equus in which he appears there are at least a half-dozen Cleopatras or Boom! s.

Upon Henry ’ s death, the Norman and English barons ignored Matilda ’ s claim to the throne, and thus through a series of decisions, Stephen, Henry ’ s favourite nephew, was welcomed by many in England and Normandy as their new ruler.

Notably, the NAS has rejected Professor Behe ’ s claim for irreducible complexity ..."

Notably, the NAS has rejected Professor Behe ’ s claim for irreducible complexity ..." ( Page 75 )

* " We therefore find that Professor Behe ’ s claim for irreducible complexity has been refuted in peer-reviewed research papers and has been rejected by the scientific community at large.

A more serious problem with Sullivan ’ s claim is the complete lack of evidence that the custom even existed in Wales in the eighteenth century.

Upon its 1938 re-release, the names of co-writer Béla Balázs and producer Harry Sokal, both Jewish, were removed from the credits ; some reports claim this was at Riefenstahl ’ s behest.

Community decision makers must make up their minds whether a claim is acceptable to the larger community in terms of prevailing expectations regarding members of nation states.

Since he had gross income of $600 or more, he must file a return in which he may claim an exemption deduction of $600.

If a litigant chooses to enforce a Federal right in a State court, he cannot be heard to object if he is treated exactly as are plaintiffs who press like claims arising under State law with regard to the form in which the claim must be stated -- the particularity, for instance, with which a cause of action must be described.

But the form in which the claim must be stated need not be different from what the State exacts in the enforcement of like obligations created by it, so long as a requirement does not add to, or diminish, the right as defined by Federal law, nor burden the realization of this right in the actualities of litigation ''.

For we must number here not only the names of Bushnell, Clarke, and Rauschenbusch, not to mention those of `` the Chicago School '' and Macintosh, but those of the brothers Niebuhr and ( if America may claim him!!

Leslie Newbiggin reflects the dominant position within the World Council of Churches when he says, `` We must claim absoluteness and finality for Christ and His finished work, but that very claim forbids us to claim absoluteness and finality for our understanding of it ''.

They claim that, for this moral order to exist, God must exist to support it.

If my poor talents can be useful in any other land, they must be of some utility to Italy ; and ought not her claim to be preferred to all others?

Furthermore, they claim that in the Bible there's no evidence showing that the office must be conveyed by laying on of hands and no Biblical command that it must be by a special class of bishops ( the laying on of hands is repeatedly used to give a commission to some person in scripture.

Reason makes equal claim to each proof, since they are both correct, so the question of the limits of time must be regarded as meaningless.

To illustrate, consider the claim " John went to a ballgame "; if true, then we must ontologically account for every entity in the sentence.

A group speaking a separate " language " is often seen as having a greater claim to being a separate " people ", and thus to be more deserving of its own independent state, while a group speaking a " dialect " tends to be seen not as " a people " in its own right, but as a sub-group, part of a bigger people, which must content itself with regional autonomy.

Solicitors must be careful when looking at older cases when quantifying a claim to ensure that the award is brought up to date and to take into account the court of appeal case in Heil v Rankin Generally speaking the greater the injury the greater the damages awarded.

The fact that other scientists – notably Étienne-Louis Malus and Augustin Fresnel – were pursuing the same investigations contemporaneously in France does not invalidate Brewster's claim to independent discovery, even though in one or two cases the priority must be assigned to others.

For example, Duncan Kennedy, in explicit reference to semiotics and deconstruction procedures, maintains that various legal doctrines are constructed around the binary pairs of opposed concepts, each of which with a claim upon intuitive and formal forms of reasoning that must be made explicit, not only in their meaning but also its relative value, and criticized.

Players must convert their pirate fortresses and have 10 victory points before being able to claim victory.

* Practices in arbitration and law, e. g., the claim that ethics itself is a matter of balancing " right versus right ," i. e., putting priorities on two things that are both right, but that must be traded off carefully in each situation.

" The attempt by some twentieth-century Catholic theologians to present the Eucharistic change as an alteration of significance ( transignification rather than transubstantiation ) was rejected by Pope Paul VI in his 1965 encyclical letter Mysterium fidei In his 1968 Credo of the People of God, he reiterated that any theological explanation of the doctrine must hold to the twofold claim that, after the consecration, 1 ) Christ's body and blood are really present ; and 2 ) bread and wine are really absent ; and this presence and absence is real and not merely something in the mind of the believer.

They claim that given a specific experiment, in which the outcome of a measurement is known before the measurement takes place, there must exist something in the real world, an " element of reality ", that determines the measurement outcome.

Specifically, the court must have both subject-matter jurisdiction over the matter of the claim and personal jurisdiction over the parties.