Help


[permalink] [id link]
+
Page "Exploitation" ¶ 18
from Wikipedia
Edit
Promote Demote Fragment Fix

Some Related Sentences

Critics and foreign
Critics of United States foreign policy such as Noam Chomsky, Susan Sontag, and anti-globalist pranksters The Yes Men are widely accepted inside the movement.
Critics point to the apparent lack of commitment by foreign manufactures to any one country site or to the creation of permanent infrastructure and employment.
Critics of neo-colonialism also argue that investment by multinational corporations enriches few in underdeveloped countries, and causes humanitarian, environmental and ecological devastation to the populations which inhabit the neocolonies whose " development " and economy is now dependent on foreign market's and large scale trade agreements.
Critics of oil imperialism theories suggest that because the United States is the third largest oil producer, and that it has historically been the leading oil producer in the world, the United States would be unlikely to predicate its foreign policy on the acquisition of oil with such an undue focus.
Critics of protectionist steel trade policies attribute the cause of this lack of competitiveness to American steel producers like Bethlehem having been shielded from foreign competition by quotas, voluntary export restraints, minimum price undertakings, and antidumping and countervailing duty measures which were in effect for the three decades preceding Bethlehem Steel's collapse.
Critics further contend that the controversial policies are fundamentally anti-democratic in that it is not for the United States or any other country or coalition of countries to determine what trade laws Iraqis must live by, and that such rules can only be legitimate if passed initially by an elected Iraqi government free of foreign occupation and domination.
Critics have further argued that it promotes the belief in a single, transcendent deity ; while this is a belief that is followed by the main Abrahamic religions of Judaism, Christianity and Islam, it is foreign to the beliefs of many other religions.
Critics of the amendment felt that the move hurt Americans competing for jobs abroad by putting an unnecessary tax burden on foreign employers.
Critics contend that spending a portion of funding on abstinence-until-marriage programs is unjust while others feel that foreign aid is generally inefficient.
Critics of this approach argue that citing foreign decisions as legal precedents threatens American sovereignty and " lends itself to manipulation.
Critics argue that when resources are transferred to foreign corporations and / or national elites, the goal of public prosperity is replaced with the goal of private accumulation.
Critics of geostrategy have asserted that it is a pseudoscientific gloss used by dominant nations to justify imperialist or hegemonic aspirations, or that it has been rendered irrelevant because of technological advances, or that its essentialist focus on geography leads geostrategists to incorrect conclusions about the conduct of foreign policy.
Critics of the sale focused on allegations directed toward Thaksin and a compliant government that the transaction was exempt from capital gains tax, the fact that the Thai company was sold to a Singaporean company, and the fact that the Thai law regarding foreign investments in the telecom sector had been amended just prior to the sale.
Critics such as Gore Vidal and Noam Chomsky have suggested that racism has played a significant role in U. S. foreign policy in the Middle East and its treatment of the Arabs.
" Critics of this interpretation argue that the Soviet economy was, in reality, rather autarkic ( self-sufficient ), that foreign trade was state-directed and played a comparatively small role in the economy as a whole, and that the foreign transactions were often non-commercial ( often a form of barter, subsidized transfers or counter-trade ).
Critics have therefore alleged that Currie's approach is nothing more than a complex pretext for not applying foreign law when there are two or more personal laws.

Critics and companies
Critics argue that content-filtering software allows private companies to censor as they please.
Critics of this practice such as Greenpeace, claim these practices contribute to inequality between developing countries rich in biodiversity, and developed countries hosting companies that engage in ' biopiracy '.
Critics claim that because some scientists ( and biological research companies ) wanted glory and fame ( and lucrative patent rights ), research progress was delayed and more people needlessly died.
Critics of economic liberalisation and deregulation cite the benefits of regulation, and believe that certain regulations do not distort markets and allows companies to continue to be competitive, or according to some, grow in competition.
Critics, however, noted the contractionary nature of these policies, arguing that in a recession, the traditional Keynesian response was to increase government spending, prop up major companies, and lower interest rates.
Critics of Martin's cuts claimed that he was in a distinct conflict of interest as his family through Canada Steamship Lines and various subsidiary and affiliated companies had once had a significant investment in the Voyageur Colonial Bus Lines, an intercity bus line in Quebec and eastern Ontario that is a key competitor of Via Rail.
Critics of pharmaceutical companies point out that only a small portion of the drug companies ' expenditures are used for research and development, with the majority of their money being spent in the areas of marketing and administration.
Critics concerned with corporate hypocrisy and insincerity generally suggest that better governmental and international regulation and enforcement, rather than voluntary measures, are necessary to ensure that companies behave in a socially responsible manner.
" Critics of H-1B use for outsourcing have also noted that more H-1B visas are granted to companies headquartered in India than companies headquartered in the United States.
Critics such as William D. Hartung, Head of the Arms Trade Resource Center, felt that it was inappropriate to appoint businessmen whose companies would be the prime benefactor of any increase in defense spending.
Critics claim that in modern society with world-wide conglomerates, or even merely large companies, the individual has no protection against fraud nor harm caused by products that maximize income by imposing externalities on the individual consumer as well as society.
Critics argue that full-time officials would free them from the distractions of a second job, but proponents of part-time officials point out that the NFL would lose a number of qualified officials because many of them are owners, presidents, or C. E. O. s of various companies.
Critics argue that privately-owned companies exploit their workers, and that, because of this exploitation, the workers do not receive the full product of their labor and are forced, by the conditions imposed upon them by capitalism, to sell their labor to business owners in order to make a living.
Critics also charged that the Directive was a sign that " Anglo-Saxon " style economics was running rampant over the EU, and they warned that the directive led inevitably to " social dumping " -- companies and jobs relocating to the low-cost and less regulated economies of eastern Europe.
Critics of the Justice Department's move say that it has no legal basis for pressuring companies to remove advertisements and that the advertisements are protected by the First Amendment.
Critics of such policies argue that it is wrong for companies to profit from censorship and restrictions on freedom of the press and freedom of speech.

Critics and allege
" Critics allege that he was endorsing the practice of " necklacing " opposition activists – placing a gasoline-soaked tire around a person's neck and setting the tire ablaze – However, just earlier in the speech, and edited from the videos, he is quoted as saying " Your tool in hand, your instrument in hand, your constitution in hand!
Critics allege that the government is seeking to use the Shura Council as a liberal bulwark to prevent clerical domination of politics.
Critics also allege that the Church uses litigation as a cover for intimidation tactics, such as investigating the criminal records of opponents ( or lack thereof ) and subjecting them to surveillance and invasive inquiries, both to discourage further criticism and to ensure the opponent's unwillingness to fight the lawsuit.
Critics allege that localism, local news and other content at the community level, media spending and coverage of news, and diversity of ownership and views have suffered as a result of these processes of media concentration.
Critics allege there is systematic abuse of the act against protesters.
Critics of president Hosni Mubarak allege that Moussa's appointment to the Office of Secretary-General of the Arab League was motivated by Mubarak's desire to remove him from the public spotlight.
Critics allege that test makers and facilitators tend to represent a middle class, white background.
Critics of lapdancing allege that some club owners, by installing dark private booths and charging dancers steep stage fees, are covertly condoning and encouraging the sale of sexual acts between customers and dancers.
Critics allege that Penelas ' failure to intervene in the Dade County ballot controversy, including failing to provide adequate security at the Dade County Building during the Brooks Brothers riot, was a contributing factor to George W. Bush's ultimate victory in the controversial election.
Critics allege that despite the publicized intentions at its founding, NCCAM and its predecessor, the Office of Alternative Medicine, have spent more than $ 800 million on such research since 1991 but have neither succeeded in demonstrating the efficacy of a single alternative method, nor declared any alternative medicine treatment ineffective.
Critics allege that many of the supposed correlations of regnal durations are the product of the selective parsing and blending of the dates, events, and individuals mentioned in the original text .< ref >
Critics also allege that the concordat undermined the separation of church and state.
Critics allege Ralston is using his influence as special envoy to secure large governmental weapons contracts for the corporations he has directorship over.
Critics of his broadcast, such as the civil rights group Southern Poverty Law Center, allege Lou Dobbs Tonight regularly aired segments featuring, and had as on-air guests, people that the SPLC considers to be involved with white supremacist groups, without the show revealing involvement in such groups.
Critics allege that Discovery Institute is inflating his reputation by constantly referring to him as a " five-time nominee for the Nobel Prize " because Nobel Prize nominations remain confidential for fifty years.
Critics of the design – build approach claim that design – build limits the clients ’ involvements in the design and allege that contractors often make design decisions outside their area of expertise.
Critics allege that other democratic countries requirements for referendums are notably lower.
Critics allege that the voter turnout at local, regional and national elections across Italy rarely ever goes past the 80-85 % mark.
Critics allege that this is the main reason that no referendums have been able to meet the quorum since 1997, despite high voter turnout for national and regional elections held in the same years.
Critics of the Museum of the Confederacy's leadership in recent decades note that it previously owned the very land on which the new hospital construction is taking place, and allege that the Museum sold it to VCU to help finance the very museum building now purportedly threatened by the hospital's expansion on the site.
Critics allege that, in virtue of laïcité, there was no need to give official representation to a religious group, which lead to communautarisme.
Critics claim that Johnson's statements validate claims leveled by those who allege that the Discovery Institute and its allied organizations are merely stripping religious content from their anti-evolution, creationist assertions as a means of avoiding the separation of church and state mandated by the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment.
Critics allege that Qutb's Milestones helped to open up a Pandora ’ s box of takfir ( declaring a Muslim to be an infidel ) that has brought serious internal strife, in particular terrorism, to the Muslim world in recent decades.

0.842 seconds.