[permalink] [id link]
Derrida will prefer to follow the more " fruitful paths ( formalization )" of a general semiotics without falling in what he considered " a hierarchizing teleology " privileging linguistics, and speak of ' mark ' rather than of language, not as something restricted to mankind, but as prelinguistic, as the pure possibility of language, working every where there is a relation to something else.
from
Wikipedia
Some Related Sentences
Derrida and will
Derrida will prefer to follow the more " fruitful paths ( formalization )" of a general semiotics without falling in what he considered " a hierarchizing teleology " privileging linguistics, and speak of ' mark ' rather than of language, not as something restricted to mankind, but as prelinguistic, as the pure possibility of language, working every where there is a relation to something else.
This structural difference is the first component that Derrida will take into account when articulating the meaning of différance, a mark he felt the need to create and will become a fundamental tool in his life long work: deconstruction.
Questioned this myth of the presence of meaning in itself (" objective ") and / or for itself (" subjective ") Derrida will start a long deconstruction of all texts where conceptual oppositions are put to work in the actual construction of meaning and values based on the subordination of the movement of " differance ":
This structural difference is the first component that Derrida will take into account when articulating the meaning of différance, a mark he felt the need to create and will become a fundamental tool in his lifelong work: deconstruction.
" Questioned this myth of the presence of meaning in itself (" objective ") and / or for itself (" subjective ") Derrida will start a long deconstruction of all texts where conceptual oppositions are put to work in the actual construction of meaning and values based on the subordination of the movement of " différance ":
In his 1989 Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity, Richard Rorty argues that Derrida ( especially in his book, The Post Card: From Socrates to Freud and Beyond ) purposefully uses words that cannot be defined ( e. g. Différance ), and uses previously definable words in contexts diverse enough to make understanding impossible, so that the reader will never be able to contextualize Derrida's literary self.
Derrida will prefer to follow the more " fruitful paths ( formalization )" of a general semiotics without falling in what he considered " a hierarchizing teleology " privileging linguistics, and speak of ' mark ' rather than of language, not as something restricted to mankind, but as prelinguistic, as the pure possibility of language, working every where there is a relation to something else.
This structural difference is the first component that Derrida will take into account when articulating the meaning of différance, a mark he felt the need to create and will become a fundamental tool in his lifelong work: deconstruction.
Questioned this myth of the presence of meaning in itself (" objective ") and / or for itself (" subjective ") Derrida will start a long deconstruction of all texts where conceptual oppositions are put to work in the actual construction of meaning and values based on the subordination of the movement of " différance ":
Critchley offers the example of the ‘ will of God ’ as the prime example of obscurantism, but within continental philosophy also the ‘ drives ’ in Sigmund Freud, ‘ archetypes ’ in Carl Jung, the ‘ real ’ in Jaques Lacan, ‘ power ’ in Michel Foucault, ‘ différance ’ in Jaques Derrida, the ‘ trace of God ’ in Emmanuel Levinas, and the ‘ epochal withdrawal of being in and as history ’ in Martin Heidegger.
Derrida and follow
:" If Dick and Ziering Kofman follow Derrida, Derrida is also following them.
Derrida and more
The popularity of the term deconstruction combined with the technical difficulty of Derrida's primary material on deconstruction and his reluctance to elaborate his understanding of the term has meant that many secondary sources have attempted to give a more straightforward explanation than Derrida himself ever attempted.
Both the concepts of rogue states and the " Axis of Evil " have been criticized by certain scholars, including philosopher Jacques Derrida and linguist Noam Chomsky, who considered it more or less a justification of imperialism and a useful word for propaganda.
( For more on this see Penser à Strasbourg, Jacques Derrida, et al., which includes reproductions of both letters and an account by Braun, " À mi-chemin entre Heidegger et Derrida ").
His parents, Aimé Derrida ( 1896 – 1970 ) and Georgette Sultana Esther Safar ( 1901 – 1991 ), named him Jackie, after American actor Jackie Coogan, though he would later adopt a more " correct " version of his first name when he moved to Paris.
This originary complexity must not be understood as an original positing, but more like a default of origin, which Derrida refers to as iterability, inscription, or textuality.
Starting in 1972, Derrida produced on average more than a book per year.
Those who argue Derrida engaged in an " ethical turn " refer to works such as The Gift of Death as evidence that he began more directly applying deconstruction to the relationship between ethics and religion.
In the October 2002, at the theatrical opening of the film Derrida, he said that, in many ways, he felt more and more close to Guy Debord's work, and that this closeness appears in Derrida's texts.
Much more important in terms of theoretical consequences, Derrida criticized Searle's work for pretending to talk about " intention " without being aware of traditional texts about the subject and without even understanding Husserl's work when talking about it.
Derrida would even argue that in a certain way he was more close to Austin, whereas Searle, in fact, was more close to the continental philosophers that Derrida tried to criticize.
And, though his poetry was never " theory-driven ", the interpretation and exegesis of some of his more difficult poems has given rise to profound philosophical speculation by thinkers as divergent as Martin Heidegger, Jacques Derrida, Michel Foucault and Theodor Adorno.
The idea that writing might function other than phonetically and also as more than merely a representative, delineation of speech allows an absolute concept of logos to end in what Derrida describes as infinitist metaphysics.
1981's " The " Sweetest Girl "" marked a stylistic change toward the more melodic, and was followed by minor hits " Faithless " ( UK No. 56 ) and double A-side " Asylums in Jerusalem " / " Jacques Derrida " ( UK No. 43 ).
However, at the end of this essay, Derrida hints at what might be a more fruitful direction for genre theory.
It has also influenced philosophers, artists and political activists, including Georges Bataille, Jacques Derrida and more recently the work of David Graeber.
Post-structuralists such as Michel Foucault and Jacques Derrida rejected structuralism's insistence on fixed meaning, its privileging of a meta-linguistic standpoint ; but continued all the more to problematize the human subject, favouring the term " the decentered subject " which implies the absence of human agency.
Derrida and )"
Logocentrism is the term Derrida uses to refer to the philosophy of determinateness, while phallocentrism is the term he uses to describe the way logocentrism itself has been genderized by a " masculinist ( phallic )" and " patriarchal " agenda.
Derrida and general
Derrida once explained that this assertion " which for some has become a sort of slogan, in general so badly understood, of deconstruction (...) means nothing else: there is nothing outside context.
Derrida devoted his life work deeply to the deconstruction of most ontological oppositions and its many declensions, not only in philosophy as in human sciences in general, cultural studies, theory of Law, etc.
* Although Derrida participated in the rallies of the May 1968 protests, and organized the first general assembly at the École Normale Superieure, he said " I was on my guard, even worried in the face of a certain cult of spontaneity, a fusionist, anti-unionist euphoria, in the face of the enthusiasm of a finally " freed " speech, of restored " transparence ," and so forth.
" Derrida writes: " Leroi-Gourhan no longer describes the unity of man and the human adventure thus by the simple possibility of the graphie in general ; rather as a stage or an articulation in the history of life — of what I have called différance — as the history of the grammè.
Derrida and without
These debates included the question of whether it was possible to do without Heidegger's philosophy, a position which Derrida in particular rejected.
On several occasions Derrida has acknowledged his debt to Husserl and Heidegger, and stated that without them he would have not said a single word.
Interviewed in 1995, Derrida talked about the difficulties of divulgative tasks under limited space and time, when professors and journalists need to explain something difficult without betraying it ; Derrida's argument was also a rebuttal of certain charges of obfuscation and obscurantism:
For example, the works of Jacques Derrida on the failure of language to impart the truth of the objects it is meant to represent would not be possible without Quintilian ’ s assumptions about the function of figurative language and tropes.
She excoriated deconstructionist Jacques Derrida as " simply not worth studying " and labels his analysis of Chinese culture " pernicious " and without " evidence of serious study ".
Derrida and what
Deconstruction is therefore not a method in the traditional sense but is what Derrida terms " an unclosed, unenclosable, not wholly formalizable ensemble of rules for reading, interpretation and writing.
" As both a structuralist and an antistructuralist gesture deconstruction is tied up with what Derrida calls the " structural problematic.
In an effort to clarify the rather muddled reception of the term deconstruction Derrida specifies what deconstruction is not through a number of negative definitions.
Derrida and others not only continued to defend the importance of reading Heidegger, but attacked Farías on the grounds of poor scholarship and for what they saw as the sensationalism of his approach.
UCI and the Derrida family are currently involved in a legal dispute regarding exactly what materials constitute his archive, part of which was informally bequeathed to the university.
Derrida considered that when encountering what he called a " classical philosophical opposition ", one never encounters " peaceful coexistence " of the two opposing concepts, but rather a " violent hierarchy ", where one of the two dominates over the other.
But, as a second step, Derrida added that one must do what is needed so that the two concepts stay separate and non hierarchical.
He expressed his disagreement with McLuhan in regard to what Derrida called McLuhan's ideology about the end of writing.
However, Derrida himself never claimed to have escaped from the metaphysics with what he has done.
" The differences and deferrings of différance, Derrida points out, are not merely ideal, they are not inscribed in the contours of the brain nor do they fall from the sky, the closest approximation would be to consider them as historical, that is, if the word history itself did not mean what it does, the airbrushing speech of the victor / vanquished.
Jacques Derrida makes an extensive study on the untranslatable concept of what is at once a "' remedy, ' recipe ,' ' drug ,' ' philter ,' etc.
Likewise, according to both Frame and Van Til, every non-Christian system contains what Jacques Derrida calls " alterity ", that is each system contains the very principles for its downfall.
The law summoning: what ' I ' can sight and what ' I ' can say that I sight in this site of a recitation where I / we is " ( Derrida, 81 ).
Philosopher Jacques Derrida, whose texts are considered difficult even by fellow scholars, explained that " In order to unfold what is implicit in so many discourses, one would have each time to make a pedagogical outlay that is just not reasonable to expect from every book.
The traditional view ( what Derrida called the ' metaphysical ' core of Western thought ) saw words as functioning like labels attached to concepts.
0.372 seconds.