Help
AI3
by Javantea — Oct 2, 2012


+ −
Dinh and Sales argued that the Legislative Line Item Veto Act of 2006 satisfies the Constitution ’ s Bicameralism and Presentment Clause, and therefore avoids the constitutional issues raised in the 1996 Act struck down by the Supreme Court.

Edit
Promote Demote Fragment Fix

+ −
Dinh and Sales argued that the Legislative Line Item Veto Act of 2006 satisfies the Constitution ’ s Bicameralism and Presentment Clause, and therefore avoids the constitutional issues raised in the 1996 Act struck down by the Supreme Court.

Edit
Promote Demote Fragment Fix
« More previous Okay Cancel More next »

0.004 seconds.



Most text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply.