In a review in the Chicago Sun-Times, Roger Ebert states: " Barrymore is the right actress for this role precisely because she approaches it with such grave calm.

" In his review of the film, Roger Ebert says that " Chaplin was technically not playing the Tramp ", but Ebert also states that, " He put the Little Tramp and $ 1. 5 million of his own money on the line to ridicule Hitler ".

For example, Roger Ebert, in his review of the film, states that " The movies make us into voyeurs.

Roger Ebert states, " from L. A. has such manic energy, such a weird, cockeyed vision, that it may work on some moviegoers as satire and on others as the real thing.

Ebert states in his review that numerous scenes in the film serve no purpose other than to represent the racism encountered by African-American musical acts during the early 1960s.

This view is shared by Roger Ebert, who, in his review of Les Vacances de Monsieur Hulot, states that Hulot “ is friendly to a fault, but he is the man nobody quite sees.

Roger Ebert gave the film three out of four stars and states that Earth, " is effective because it doesn't require much history from its viewers, explains what needs to be known, and has a universal message.

Roger Ebert noted that " Metropolis is one of the great achievements of the silent era, a work so audacious in its vision and so angry in its message that it is, if anything, more powerful today than when it was made.

Ebert has emphasized that his star ratings have little meaning if not considered in the context of the review itself.

Although doctors have asked him to allow them to make one more attempt to restore his voice, Ebert has refused, indicating that he is done with surgery, and will likely decline significant intervention even if his cancer returns, as he feels that the last procedure he underwent did more harm than good.

Additionally, Ebert considered John Neville's title role performance as appearing " sensible and matter-of-fact, as anyone would if they had spent a lifetime growing accustomed to the incredible ".

Roger Ebert said of Brown's work, " the beautiful photography he brought home almost makes you wonder if Hollywood hasn't been trying too hard ".

Influential film critic Roger Ebert gave the film a positive review, but was measured in his praise :" If you are attentive to the style, if you think about what Wong is doing, Chungking Express works.

Roger Ebert of the Chicago Sun-Times commented that " The movie is silly beyond comprehension, and even if it weren't silly, it would still be beyond comprehension " but does comment that the film has its good moments.

Film critic Roger Ebert reviewed the film in 1998 with great praise, and remarked of Brooks ' presence, " she regards us from the screen as if the screen were not there ; she casts away the artifice of film and invites us to play with her ".

Roger Ebert noted in his review of the film that “ it ’ s as if they have the treasure of a Woody Allen movie and they ’ re trying to package it for the American Pie crowd .” The film was a flop stateside, opening at # 12 its opening weekend and grossing only $ 3. 2 million.

Roger Ebert awarded three stars out of a possible four with his own consensus, stating: " Bullock does a good job here of working against her natural likability, creating a character you'd like to like, and could like, if she weren't so sad, strange and turned in upon herself.

Roger Ebert gave this film two stars, saying, " Nine Months is one of those movies where the outcome is abundantly clear to everyone but the hero, who remains in the hapless position of playing dumb because, if he didn't, there wouldn't be a plot.

When asked by Ebert where the Reichswehr stood, von Seeckt answered “ The Reichswehr stands behind me ”, and after the question whether the Reichswehr was reliable, Seeckt answered: “ I don't know if it is reliable but it obeys my orders !”.

Roger Ebert in the Chicago Sun-Times wrote ; " The Secret of My Success seems trapped in some kind of time warp, as if the screenplay had been in a drawer since the 1950s and nobody bothered to update it.

In a question and answer session following a festival screening, in response to an audience member who asked director Lin if he thought it was irresponsible to portray Asian-Americans in such a negative light, Roger Ebert stood up and said, angrily, " You wouldn't say that to a white filmmaker ".

However, Roger Ebert gave the film three-and-a-half stars out of four and compared it to Rosemary's Baby saying, " Birth is less sensational and more ominous, and also more intriguing because instead of going for quick thrills, it explores what might really happen if a 10-year-old turned up and said what Sean says ".

Roger Ebert of the Chicago Sun-Times said the film " only works if it understands Jeanne is one villain among many, not a misguided heroine.

Roger Ebert of the Chicago Sun-Times rated the film 1½ stars and called it " an anthology of cliches " and " a thriller that thrills us only if we abandon all common sense.

Roger Ebert wrote, " I sometimes enjoy movies that make no sense whatsoever, if that's their intention.

Although the film was based on actual events in the actors ' lives, Shawn and Gregory denied ( in an interview by film critic Roger Ebert ) that they were playing themselves, and stated that if they remade the film they would swap the two characters to prove their point.

" Ebert also complimented director Eastwood mentioning how he " caresses the material as if he didn't know B movies have gone out of style.

Critic Roger Ebert enjoyed the film, giving it 3 stars out of 4, saying: " Watching the movie is an entertaining exercise in forensic viewing, and the insidious thing is, even if it is a con, who is the conner and who is the connee?

" Despite a mixed review about the film's credibility and diction, Roger Ebert of the Chicago Sun-Times concluded his review by saying that " Matthau and Lemmon are fun to see together, if for no other reason than just for the essence of their beings.

Ebert also praised the casting, even if it relied on typecasting an actor like Marvin.

Reichspräsident Friedrich Ebert: ( 1923 ), as Provisional President of the Weimar Republic in 1919, he contributed to the myth, in telling home-coming veterans that “ no enemy has vanquished you ”.

Even provisional President Friedrich Ebert contributed to the myth when he saluted returning veterans with the oration that " no enemy has vanquished you " ( kein Feind hat euch überwunden!

Cracked. com writer Robert Brockway responded by opining that this made Ebert unqualified to judge video games, and that debating Ebert on such a topic was comparable to " a structured philosophical debate on the importance of pacifism and restraint with a rabid badger: Your opponent is not only unqualified from the start, but it's obviously just out to attack you.

A statement from Ebert and his wife indicated that " the surgery went well, and the Eberts look forward to giving you more good news ..." but on April 1, his 41st anniversary as a film critic at the Sun-Times, Ebert announced that there had been further complications and his speech had not been restored.

Roger Ebert of the Chicago Sun-Times observed, " You don't know where to position yourself while you're watching a film like All About My Mother, and that's part of the appeal: Do you take it seriously, like the characters do, or do you notice the bright colors and flashy art decoration, the cheerful homages to Tennessee Williams and All About Eve, and see it as a parody?

When the film was released, film critic Roger Ebert lauded the film, writing, " The Hospital is a better movie than you may have been led to believe.

Roger Ebert wrote, " The DJ who was hosting the radio station's free preview of Cool World leaped onto the stage and promised the audience: ' If you liked Roger Rabbit, you'll love Cool World!

Roger Ebert awarded the film four out of four stars and wrote in his review for the Chicago Sun-Times, " The movie is a satire that contains just enough realistic ballast to be teasingly plausible ; like Dr. Strangelove, it makes you laugh, and then it makes you wonder.

Film critic Roger Ebert gave the film four out of four stars and wrote, " Films like Speed belong to the genre I call Bruised Forearm Movies, because you're always grabbing the arm of the person sitting next to you.

Roger Ebert gave the film one and a half stars and wrote, " The film has been directed without grace, vision, originality, and although you may walk out quoting lines of dialogue, it will not be because you admire them " and criticized its liberties with historical facts: " There is no sense of history, strategy or context ; according to this movie, Japan attacked Pearl Harbor because America cut off its oil supply, and they were down to an 18-month reserve.

Ebert writes, " The movie presents us with an image, and while you may discuss the meaning of the image, it is not permitted to devise explanations for it.

Roger Ebert called it " a " Ghost " for grownups " ( a common comparison because of the shared theme of husbands returning as ghosts and the concurrent releases of the movies ) and considered the movie to reveal " some truths that are, the more you think about them, really pretty profound ".

" Roger Ebert also criticized the morality tale character of the movie, saying that " you can't have heroes and villains when the wrong side is making the best sense.

Empire magazine gave the film 4 / 5 stars, referring to it as " fascinating " and " cerebral " Jeffrey Lyons stated that the film was " mesmerizing " while Richard Corliss in Time Magazine referred to the film as " cinematic " Mick LaSalle of The San Francisco Chronicle wrote that " the picture never stops coming at you " Roger Ebert of the Chicago Sun-Times gave the film three-and-a-half stars ( out of four ) and included the film among his Great Movies list.

Ebert explained, " She has one of those rich voices that makes you wish she had more to say and in a better role .... Too bad she plays her last scene without a head.