Help


[permalink] [id link]
+
Page "Stationary process" ¶ 3
from Wikipedia
Edit
Promote Demote Fragment Fix

Some Related Sentences

Formally and let
Formally, let S and T be finite sets and let F =
If R is a ring, let R denote the ring of polynomials in the indeterminate X over R. Hilbert proved that if R is " not too large ", in the sense that if R is Noetherian, the same must be true for R. Formally,
Formally, let P be an expression in which the variable x is free.
Formally, let
Formally, let be a surjective homomorphism.
Formally, let f: < sup > n </ sup > → be the cost function which must be minimized.
Formally, let P and Q be abelian categories, and let
Formally, let A be a real matrix of which we want to compute the eigenvalues, and let A < sub > 0 </ sub >:= A.
Formally, let G be a Coxeter group with reduced root system R and k < sub > v </ sub > a multiplicity function on R ( so k < sub > u </ sub > = k < sub > v </ sub > whenever the reflections σ < sub > u </ sub > and σ < sub > v </ sub > corresponding to the roots u and v are conjugate in G ).
Formally, let p ( x, y ) be a complex polynomial in the complex variables x and y.
Formally, for received words, let denote the Hamming distance between and, that is, the number of positions in which and differ.
Formally, let p and q be two nonzero polynomials, respectively of degree m and n. Thus:
Formally, let P be a poset ( partially ordered set ), and let F be a filter on P ; that is, F is a subset of P such that:
Formally, let denote the pairwise score for against.
Formally, let X be any scheme and S be a sheaf of graded-algebras ( the definition of which is similar to the definition of-modules on a locally ringed space ): that is, a sheaf with a direct sum decomposition

Formally and be
However, shortly after this positive result, Kurt Gödel published On Formally Undecidable Propositions of Principia Mathematica and Related Systems ( 1931 ), showing that in any sufficiently strong axiomatic system there are true statements which cannot be proved in the system.
Formally the algorithm can be described as:
Formally, if M is a set, the identity function f on M is defined to be that function with domain and codomain M which satisfies
Formally, a frame is defined to be a lattice L in which finite meets distribute over arbitrary joins, i. e. every ( even infinite ) subset
Formally a random variable is considered to be a function on the possible outcomes.
Formally the " head of state " can also personally be the " head of government " ( ex officio or by ad hoc cumulation such as an absolute monarch nominating himself ) but otherwise has formal precedence over the Head of Government and other ministers, whether he is their actual political superior ( absolute monarch, executive president ) or rather theoretical or ceremonial in character.
Formally, in the finite-dimensional case, if the linear map is represented as a multiplication by a matrix A and the translation as the addition of a vector, an affine map acting on a vector can be represented as
Formally, the theorem can be stated as follows:
Formally, the convex hull may be defined as the intersection of all convex sets containing X or as the set of all convex combinations of points in X.
Formally, a decision problem is P-complete ( complete for the complexity class P ) if it is in P and that every problem in P can be reduced to it by using an appropriate reduction.
Formally, a detailed balanced process is the one on which the probability to be in the state x and transit to x ' must be the same as to be in the state x ' and transit to x.
Formally, a unique factorization domain is defined to be an integral domain R in which every non-zero and non-unit x of R can be written as a product ( including an empty product ) of irreducible elements p < sub > i </ sub > of R and a unit u:
Formally, powers with positive integer exponents may be defined by the initial condition
Formally, the problem of supervised pattern recognition can be stated as follows: Given an unknown function ( the ground truth ) that maps input instances to output labels, along with training data assumed to represent accurate examples of the mapping, produce a function that approximates as closely as possible the correct mapping.
Formally the self-inductance of a wire loop would be given by the above equation with i
Formally, a government would lay out its reasons for going to war, as well as its intentions in prosecuting it and the steps that might be taken to avert it.
Formally, if is any non-zero polynomial, it must be writable as.
Formally, a Menger sponge can be defined as follows:
Formally, the case where only a subset of parameters is defined is still a composite hypothesis ; nonetheless, the term point hypothesis is often applied in such cases, particularly where the hypothesis test can be structured in such a way that the distribution of the test statistic ( the distribution under the null hypothesis ) does not depend on the parameters whose values have not been specified under the point null hypothesis.

Formally and process
Formally, a Markov chain is a random process with the Markov property.
Formally, the appointment remains a royal one made on the advice of the Lord Chancellor, but he / she no longer comments on individual applications, and merely supervises the process and reviews the panel's recommendations in general terms ( satisfying himself / herself that the process as operated is fair and efficient ).
Formally, the process is one of progressive development, divided into three stages of increasingly complexity.
Formally, this effect is referred to as and is a process whereby the capture frame rate of the camera changes over time.
Formally, the sets of free and bound names of a process in π – calculus are defined inductively as follows.
Formally, it is the process of eliciting information from the government.
Formally, a deterministic algorithm computes a mathematical function ; a function has a unique value for any given input, and the algorithm is a process that produces this particular value as output.

0.234 seconds.