Help


[permalink] [id link]
+
Page "Theory of relativity" ¶ 37
from Wikipedia
Edit
Promote Demote Fragment Fix

Some Related Sentences

Fresnel's and partial
The two most important models, which were aimed to describe the relative motion of the Earth and aether, were Augustin-Jean Fresnel's ( 1818 ) model of the ( nearly ) stationary aether including a partial aether drag determined by Fresnel's dragging coefficient,
His conclusion was to rule out Fresnel's hypothesis of a stationary aether with partial aether dragging, confirming Stokes ' hypothesis of complete aether dragging.

Fresnel's and dragging
Although the aether is almost stationary according to Fresnel, his theory predicts a positive outcome of aether drift experiments only to second order in, because Fresnel's dragging coefficient would cause a negative outcome of all optical experiments capable of measuring effects to first order in.
In agreement with Fresnel's dragging coefficient, he obtained a negative result.
This could be explained by using Fresnel's dragging coefficient, according to which the aether and thus light is partially dragged by moving matter.
Fresnel's dragging coefficient was confirmed by the Fizeau experiment ( and its repetitions ).
Also Fresnel's dragging coefficient is reproduced, that is, in Lorentz's theory it is a modification of the propagation of light waves, not the result of any aether entrainment.
To reproduce Fresnel's dragging coefficient ( and therefore to explain the Fizeau experiment ), he argued that although the aether is completely dragged by matter, it has a different velocity within matter which would lead to the same expression as Fresnel's.
Fresnel's theory was preferred because his dragging coefficient was confirmed by the Fizeau experiment of Hippolyte Fizeau in 1851, who measured the speed of light in moving liquids.
Fresnel's dragging coefficient was confirmed very exactly on that occasion, and Michelson was now of the opinion that Fresnel's stationary aether theory is correct.
# The speed of light in moving media is not composed by the speed of light when the medium is at rest, and the velocity of the medium, but is determined by Fresnel's dragging coefficient, by c.
As it was explained above, already in 1895 Lorentz succeeded in deriving Fresnel's dragging coefficient ( to first order of v / c ) and the Fizeau experiment by using the electromagnetic theory and the concept of local time.

Fresnel's and hypothesis
The key difficulty with Fresnel's aether hypothesis arose from the juxtaposition of the two well-established theories of Newtonian dynamics and Maxwell's electromagnetism.

Fresnel's and v
However, the most important experiment supporting Fresnel's theory, was Fizeau's 1851 experimental confirmation of Fresnel's 1818 prediction that a medium with refractive index n moving with a velocity v would increase the speed of light traveling through the medium in the same direction as v from c / n to:

Fresnel's and effects
* Fresnel's theory of an ( almost ) stationary aether predicts positive results by experiments which are sensible enough to detect second order effects.

Fresnel's and <
Geometric arrangement for Fresnel's calculation Consider the case of a point source located at a point P < sub > 0 </ sub >, vibrating at a frequency f. The disturbance may be described by a complex variable U < sub > 0 </ sub > known as the complex amplitude.

Fresnel's and were
So the physicists were confronted with two seemingly contradictory experiments: The 1886-experiment as an apparent confirmation of Fresnel's stationary aether, and the 1887-experiment as an apparent confirmation of Stokes ' completely dragged aether.

Fresnel's and principle
At the heart of Fresnel's wave theory is the Huygens-Fresnel principle, which states that every unobstructed point of a wavefront becomes the source of a secondary spherical wavelet and that the amplitude of the optical field E at a point on the screen is given by the superposition of all those secondary wavelets taking into account their relative phases.

Fresnel's and small
He used Fresnel's theory to predict that a bright spot will appear in the center of the shadow of a small disc and deduced from this that the theory was incorrect.

Fresnel's and be
This was initially interpreted to mean that the medium drags the aether along, with a portion of the medium's velocity, but that understanding became very problematic after Wilhelm Veltmann demonstrated that the index n in Fresnel's formula depended upon the wavelength of light, so that the aether could not be moving at a wavelength-independent speed.
However, Hendrik Antoon Lorentz ( 1895 ) modified Fresnel's theory and showed that those experiments can be explained by a stationary aether as well:
Eventually, Fresnel's idea of an ( almost ) stationary aether was preferred because it appeared to be confirmed by the Fizeau experiment ( 1851 ) and the aberration of light.

Fresnel's and with
In 1885, Michelson began a collaboration with Edward Morley, spending considerable time and money to confirm with higher accuracy Fizeau's 1851 experiment on Fresnel's drag coefficient, to improve on Michelson's 1881 experiment, and to establish the wavelength of light as a standard of length.
He measures fringing due to motion of the water, perfectly in line with Fresnel's formula.

Fresnel's and .
Poisson was a member of the French Academy which reviewed Fresnel's work.
Poisson studied Fresnel's theory in detail and of course looked for a way to prove it wrong being a supporter of the particle-theory of light.
As mentioned before the Arago spot is not easily observed in every-day situations, so it was only natural for Poisson to interpret it as an absurd result and that it should disprove Fresnel's theory.
In 1886, Michelson and Morley successfully confirmed Fresnel's drag coefficient – this result was also considered as a confirmation of the stationary aether concept.
His thesis of 126 pages concerns Fresnel's wave-surface.
The 1st Korps commander then brought an additional force of 12 battalions of Feldmarshalleutnant Fresnel's division, which he deployed on two lines, behind the position and formed the rest of his Corps in a line between Aderklaa and Deutsch-Wagram.
Other examples of common path interferometer include the Zernike phase contrast microscope, Fresnel's biprism, the zero-area Sagnac, and the scatterplate interferometer.
The Cornu spiral, a graphical device for the computation of light intensities in Fresnel's model of near-field diffraction, is named after him.
Siméon-Denis Poisson, one of the members of the judging committee, studied Fresnel's theory in detail.
The Poisson spot is not easily observed in every-day situations, so it was only natural for Poisson to interpret it as an absurd result and that it should disprove Fresnel's theory.
The reflectivity is a material characteristic, depends on the wavelength, and is related to the refractive index of the material through Fresnel's equations.
It is important to note that both Newton's particle theory and Fresnel's wave theory both assume an aether exists, albeit for different reasons.

partial and ether
Cullen used a pump to create a partial vacuum over a container of diethyl ether, which then boiled, absorbing heat from the surrounding air.
Cullen used a pump to create a partial vacuum over a container of diethyl ether, which then boiled, absorbing heat from the surroundings.

partial and dragging
The Fizeau experiment and its 1886 repetition by Michelson and Morley apparently confirmed the stationary aether with partial aether dragging, and refuted complete aether dragging.
He remained convinced this was due to partial entrainment or aether dragging, though he did not attempt a detailed explanation.
* It was already known in the 19th century, that partial aether dragging requires the relative velocity of aether and matter to be different for light of different colours-which is evidently not the case.

0.515 seconds.