[permalink] [id link]
In Gonzales v. O Centro Espirita Beneficente Uniao do Vegetal, the Supreme Court heard arguments on November 1, 2005 and unanimously ruled in February 2006 that the U. S. federal government must allow the UDV to import and consume the tea for religious ceremonies under the 1993 Religious Freedom Restoration Act.
from
Wikipedia
Some Related Sentences
Gonzales and v
A court case allowing the União do Vegetal to import and use the tea for religious purposes in the United States, Gonzales v. O Centro Espirita Beneficente Uniao do Vegetal, was heard by the U. S. Supreme Court on November 1, 2005 ; the decision, released February 21, 2006, allows the UDV to use the tea in its ceremonies pursuant to the Religious Freedom Restoration Act.
" Gonzales v. Duenas-Alvarez, ( citations omitted ).
Recently, the Commerce Clause was interpreted to include marijuana laws in the Gonzales v. Raich decision.
* 2005 – The United States Supreme Court upholds a federal law banning cannabis, including medical marijuana, in Gonzales v. Raich.
Gilmore initially lost the case, known as Gilmore v. Gonzales, and an appeal to the U. S. Supreme Court was denied.
* Nitke v. Gonzales ( a case involving Barbara Nitke and the National Coalition for Sexual Freedom regarding internet obscenity )
According to the court's ruling in Gonzales v. UDV,, RFRA remains applicable to federal laws and so those laws must still have a " compelling interest ".
Most recently, the Commerce Clause was cited in the 2005 decision Gonzales v. Raich.
Some of its major rulings have concerned federal preemption ( Wyeth v. Levine ), civil procedure ( Twombly-Iqbal ), abortion ( Gonzales v. Carhart ), and the Bill of Rights, prominently Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission ( First Amendment ), Heller-McDonald ( Second Amendment ), and Baze v. Rees ( Eighth Amendment ).
A separate challenge to the provisions governing obscenity, known as Nitke v. Gonzales, was rejected by a federal court in New York in 2005.
* Kahle v. Gonzales
He argued the unconstitutionality of secret law regarding travel security policies in Gilmore v. Gonzales.
* Gilmore v. Gonzales information
Along with other foreign-made works, the film's U. S. copyright was restored in 1998, but the constitutionality of this copyright extension was challenged in Golan v. Gonzales and as Golan v. Holder it was ruled that " In the United States, that body of law includes the bedrock principle that works in the public domain remain in the public domain.
* Castle Rock v. Gonzales ( 2005 ), a U. S. Supreme Court case
The Supreme Court wavered, however, in Gonzales v. Raich ( 2005 ), holding that the federal government could outlaw the use of marijuana for medical purposes under the Commerce Clause even if the marijuana was never bought or sold, and never crossed state lines.
( See Gonzales v. Oregon )
* Cato senior fellow Randy Barnett argued the Gonzales v. Raich case before the Supreme Court in 2004.
This limited model has withstood constitutional scrutiny: Gonzales v Oregon 368 F. 3d 1118 ( 2004 ), affirmed by 546 U. S. 243 ( 2006 )
The United States Supreme Court ruled in United States v. Oakland Cannabis Buyers ' Coop and Gonzales v. Raich that the federal government has the authority to regulate and criminalize cultivation and distribution of cannabis under the interstate commerce clause, as even purely intrastate sales will affect the market price in other states by altering nationwide supply and demand patterns.
Gonzales and .
We have concluded that petitioner's claims are controlled by the rationale of Gonzales v. United States, 348 U.S. 407 ( 1955 ), and United States v. Nugent, 346 U.S. 1 ( 1953 ), and therefore affirm the judgment.
We found in Gonzales v. United States, supra, that this was the controlling reason why copies of the recommendation should be furnished a registrant.
As was said in Gonzales, `` it is the Appeal Board which renders the selective service determination considered ' final ' in the courts, not to be overturned unless there is no basis in fact.
Gonzales v. United States, supra.
Word reached the company that the man behind these depredations was Manuel Gonzales, a man with many followers, including a number who were kept in line through fear of him.
Still there was no Gonzales and the family would say nothing.
While prowling around these buildings, two of the posse recognized the voice of Gonzales speaking to the people inside.
When it became obvious that he could stay inside no longer, taking a thousand to one chance Gonzales rushed outside, square against the muzzle of a Winchester.
A Mexican justice of the peace had issue a writ against Chavez for taking part in the `` murder '' of Manuel Gonzales so he and his father were anxious to be taken out of danger.
* Gonzales: Gonzales is the smuggler who makes the arrangements for Rambert's escape.
He introduces Rambert to Gonzales.
However, Corky Gonzales and Reies Tijerina stirred up old tensions about New Mexican land claims with roots going back to before the Mexican-American War.
Gonzales and O
" And just about everyone did: Ella Fitzgerald, Eddie Jefferson, Betty Carter, Anita O ’ Day, Joe Carroll, Sarah Vaughan, Carmen McRae, Jon Hendricks, Babs Gonzales, and Dizzy Gillespie all were important singers in the idiom.
Additional actors included Seán G. Griffin as the Sultan ; Don Darryl Rivera as Iago ; and, playing Omar, Babkak, and Kassim – a trio of characters originally conceived by the film's creators but not used – Andrew Keenan-Bolger, Brian Gonzales, and Brandon O ' Neill.
A Lieutenant Gonzales on the other end of the line claims there's no one in their records called O ' Brien.
A recent court case involving caapi-containing ayahuasca ( which also contains other plants containing the controlled substance DMT, introduced from the Psychotria viridis plant ), Gonzales v. O Centro Espirita Beneficente Uniao do Vegetal, was found in favor of the União do Vegetal, a Brazilian religious sect using the tea in their ceremonies and having around 130 members in the United States.
But it continues to be applied to the federal government, for instance in Gonzales v. O Centro Espirita Beneficente Uniao do Vegetal, because Congress has broad authority to carve out exemptions from federal laws and regulations that it itself has authorized.
The constitutionality of RFRA as applied to the federal government was confirmed on February 21, 2006, as the Supreme Court ruled unanimously against the government in Gonzales v. O Centro Espirita Beneficente Uniao do Vegetal,, which involved the use of an otherwise illegal substance in a religious ceremony, decisively stating that the federal government must show a compelling state interest in restricting religious freedom.
* Storyboards: Bob Arkwright, Michael V. Bennett, Tom Bernardo, Robin O. Brigstoke, Curtis Cim, Victor A. Cook, Adrian Gonzales, Cullen Blaine Houghtaling, Michael Hulme, Chantal Itkin, Ken Laramay, Bob Lizarraga, Job C. Martin, Kenny McGill, Keith Sargeant, Robert E. Steele Jr., Keith Tucker, Richard T. Walsh
* Gonzales v. O Centro Espirita Beneficente Uniao do Vegetal, 546 U. S. 418 ( 2006 )
* Vincent O ' Brien – Barclay ( 1959 ), White Gloves ( 1966 ), Reindeer ( 1969 ), Caucasus ( 1975 ), Meneval ( 1976 ), Transworld ( 1977 ), Gonzales ( 1980 ), Leading Counsel ( 1985 ), Dark Lomond ( 1988 )
0.348 seconds.