Help


[permalink] [id link]
+
Page "Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution" ¶ 34
from Wikipedia
Edit
Promote Demote Fragment Fix

Some Related Sentences

Trop and v
In Trop v. Dulles,, the Supreme Court held that punishing a natural-born citizen for a crime by taking away his citizenship is unconstitutional, being " more primitive than torture " because it involved the " total destruction of the individual's status in organized society.
* Trop v. Dulles
Trop v. Dulles, 356 U. S. 86 ( 1958 ), was a federal case in the United States in which the Supreme Court ruled, 5-4, that it was unconstitutional for the government to revoke the citizenship of a U. S. citizen as a punishment.
# redirect Trop v. Dulles
* Cruel and unusual punishment: Trop v. Dulles, Robinson v. California
This was seen in the 1958 Supreme Court case of Trop v. Dulles:
It thus paves the way to a modern interpretation of the Bill of Rights based on a new criterion: the " evolving standards of decency of a maturing society " designed by the Supreme Court in Trop v. Dulles, 356 U. S. 86 ( 1957 ).

Trop and .
The Zone includes two World War II warplanes donated by the British government: a Ju 87 R-2 / Trop.
* Ahn, P. M., 1993, " Tropical soils and fertilizer use ", Intermediate Trop.
* Eulophia gonychila ( Tanzania to S. Trop.
Trop.
* B. martiana ( S. Trop.
* B. nodosa-Lady-of-the-night Orchid ( Mexico to Trop.
* S. candida ( S. Trop.
* S. grandiflora ( Trinidad to S. Trop.
Trop.
Trop.
* Gongora atropurpurea ( Trinidad and Tobago to S. Trop.

Trop and from
A very similar rhyme ' Old Dame Trop ' was published in 1803, but since the language in ' Old Mother Hubbard ' appears more archaic it is not clear that it was derived from this verse.
Albert Trop was a natural born citizen of the United States who, while serving as a private in the United States Army in 1944, deserted from an Army stockade in Casablanca, Morocco.
" Mussolini was first flown from Campo Imperatore in a Luftwaffe Fieseler Fi 156C-3 / Trop Storch STOL liaison aircraft, Werknummer ( serial number ) 1268, initially flown in by Captain Walter Gerlach, then taking off with Mussolini and Skorzeny ( even though the weight of an extra passenger almost caused the tiny plane to crash ) to the military airport of Pratica di Mare ( near Rome ) then embarked in an Heinkel HE111 on to Vienna, where Mussolini stayed overnight at the Hotel Imperial and was given a hero's welcome.
Cambodia's premiere performing art form is the, Khmer classical dance, or Robam Preah Reach Trop, is a highly stylized dance form originating from the royal courts.

v and .
Lincoln denounced the Supreme Court decision in Dred Scott v. Sandford as a conspiracy to extend slavery.
In March 1857, the Supreme Court issued its decision in Dred Scott v. Sandford ; Chief Justice Roger B. Taney opined that blacks were not citizens, and derived no rights from the Constitution.
One example of this ( from the Queen's Bench in England ) is Doyle v Olby ( Ironmongers ) Ltd 2 QB 158, the claimant appealed ( successfully ) on the basis that, although he won in the court below, the lower court had applied the wrong measure of damages and he had not been fully recompensated.
" " Graham v. Borgen ", 483 F 3d.
* Emperor Charles I. of Austria ( 1916 – 1918 ) http :// www. youtube. com / watch? v = jMU9FFzez1A
* Emperor Franz Joseph ( 1848 – 1916 ) http :// www. youtube. com / watch? v = jecUwMPk8pE & feature = related
The doctrine that no man can cast off his native allegiance without the consent of his sovereign was early abandoned in the United States, and Chief Justice John Rutledge also declared in Talbot v. Janson, " a man may, at the same time, enjoy the rights of citizenship under two governments.
Austrian economics, 3 v. Edward Elgar.
Description and scroll to chapter preview links for v. 1.
Part of Title I was found unconstitutional by the United States Supreme Court as it pertains to states in the case of Board of Trustees of the University of Alabama v. Garrett as violating the sovereign immunity rights of the several states as specified by the Eleventh Amendment to the United States Constitution.
In fact, Congress explicitly cited Toyota v. Williams in the text of the ADAAA itself as one of its driving influences for passing the ADAAA.
Access Now v. Southwest Airlines
Access Now v. Southwest Airlines was a case where the District Court decided that the website of Southwest Airlines was not in violation of the Americans with Disability Act because the ADA is concerned with things with a physical existence and thus cannot be applied to cyberspace.

v and Dulles
His right to travel was restored by Kent v. Dulles, but his health soon broke down.
* Nishikawa v. Dulles,

v and Chief
But 28 years later, in an appearance on MSNBC television, Falwell said he was not troubled by reports that the nominee for Chief Justice of the United States Supreme Court, John G. Roberts ( whose appointment was confirmed by the U. S. Senate ) had done volunteer legal work for homosexual rights activists on the case of Romer v. Evans.
Inscription on the wall of the United States Supreme Court Building | Supreme Court Building from Marbury v. Madison, in which Chief Justice John Marshall outlined the concept of judicial review.
In Atkins v. Virginia, for example, the majority cited the fact that the European Union forbid death penalty as part of their reasoning, while Chief Justice Rehnquist denounced the " Court's decision to place weight on foreign laws.
In the landmark decision Nixon v. General Services Administration former Chief Justice of the United States William Rehnquist declared in his dissent the need to " fully describe the preeminent position that the President of the United States occupies with respect to our Republic.
In Martin v. Hunter's Lessee ( 1816 ), the Supreme Court confronted the Chief Justice of Virginia, Spencer Roane, who had previously declared a Supreme Court decision unconstitutional and refused to permit the state courts to abide by it.
In Lovell v. City of Griffin,, Chief Justice Hughes defined the press as, " every sort of publication which affords a vehicle of information and opinion.
In Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer 343 U. S. 579, 644 ( 1952 ), Justice Robert H. Jackson's concurring opinion cites the Third Amendment as providing evidence of the Framers ' intent to constrain executive power even during wartime: " hat military powers of the Commander in Chief were not to supersede representative government of internal affairs seems obvious from the Constitution and from elementary American history.
Justice Arthur Goldberg ( joined by Chief Justice Earl Warren and Justice William Brennan ) expressed this view in a concurring opinion in the case of Griswold v. Connecticut ( 1965 ):
Under Chief Justices Jay, Rutledge, and Ellsworth ( 1789 – 1801 ), the Court heard few cases ; its first decision was West v. Barnes ( 1791 ), a case involving a procedural issue.
The decision to emphasize the Copyright clause argument was based on both the minority opinion of Judge Sentelle in the appeals court, and on several recent Supreme Court decisions authored by Chief Justice William Rehnquist: United States v. Lopez and United States v. Morrison.
As early as 1819, Chief Justice John Marshall noted in the famous case McCulloch v. Maryland, that " the opinions expressed by the authors of that work have been justly supposed to be entitled to great respect in expounding the Constitution.
In Santa Clara County v. Southern Pacific Railroad, 118 U. S. 394 ( 1886 ), the reporter noted in the headnote to the opinion that the Chief Justice began oral argument by stating, " The court does not wish to hear argument on the question whether the provision in the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution, which forbids a State to deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws, applies to these corporations.
Indeed, Chief Justice William Rehnquist repeatedly criticized the Court's invention of corporate constitutional " rights ," most famously in his dissenting opinion in the 1978 case First National Bank of Boston v. Bellotti.
In June 1830, a delegation led by Chief Ross defended Cherokee rights before the U. S. Supreme Court in Cherokee Nation v. Georgia.
In Worcester v. Georgia ( 1832 ), the US Supreme Court Chief Justice John Marshall ruled that American Indian nations were " distinct, independent political communities retaining their original natural rights ," and entitled to federal protection from the actions of state governments that infringed on their sovereignty.
A District court ruled in favor of the Indians, citing Chief Justice John Marshall in Worcester v. Georgia.
The county was officially organized on January 4, 1837, and named in honor of Roger Brooke Taney, the fifth Chief Justice of the U. S. Supreme Court, most remembered for later delivering the majority opinion in Dred Scott v. Sandford.
Long successfully argued the case on appeal before the U. S. Supreme Court ( Cumberland Tel & Tel Co. v. Louisiana Public Service Commission, 260 U. S. 212 ( 1922 ), prompting Chief Justice William Howard Taft to describe Long as one of the best legal minds he had ever encountered.
William H. Rehnquist, one of Marshall's successors as Chief Justice wrote that Fletcher v. Peck " represented an attempt by Chief Justice Marshall to extend the protection of the contract clause to infant business.
Later, in the case of Willson v. Black-Bird Creek Marsh Co.,, Chief Justice Marshall wrote: " We do not think that the act empowering the Black Bird Creek Marsh Company to place a dam across the creek, can, under all the circumstances of the case, be considered as repugnant to the power to regulate commerce in its dormant state, or as being in conflict with any law passed on the subject.

1.029 seconds.