In his review for The New York Observer, Andrew Sarris wrote, " here is the ironic twist in my acceptance of Pearl Harbor-the parts I liked most are the parts before and after the digital destruction of Pearl Harbor by the Japanese carrier planes " and felt that " Pearl Harbor is not so much about World War II as it is about movies about World War II.

In his review for The New York Observer, Andrew Sarris wrote, " In the case of Magnolia, I think Mr. Anderson has taken us to the water's edge without plunging in.

In his review for The New York Observer, Andrew Sarris wrote, " The film's greatest achievement, however, is in keeping a dizzying variety of characters at odds with each other without any breach of good manners, and without descending to facile stereotypes and caricatures ".

In his review for The New York Observer, Andrew Sarris wrote, " We get the best of independent cinema and the best of mainstream cinema all in one package.

In his review for The New York Observer, Andrew Sarris wrote, " If anything, Syriana tends to oversimplify a mind-bogglingly multifaceted problem that cannot so easily be resolved by a diatribe against the supposedly all-powerful ' Americans '".

In his review for The New York Observer, Andrew Sarris wrote, " Still, no previous American film has ventured into this still largely unknown territory with such authority and emotional detachment.

0.008 seconds.