Judges and counsel do not wear either wig or gown in the family courts but will dutifully don the court coat ( if applicable ) and a wing collar and bands nonetheless.

Judges wear black gowns in the Employment Court, District Court and High Court, while counsel are only required to wear black gowns for jury trials in the District Court, and all the time in the Employment Court, High Court and Court of Appeal.

Judges wear black gowns in the District Court, High Court Court of Appeal and the Supreme Court of Sri Lanka while counsel only wear black gowns in the latter three courts.

Judges under the jurisdiction of the Chicago board of election commissioners are instructed to do this.

* Judges ' commissions are valid quamdiu se bene gesserint ( during good behaviour ), and if they do not behave themselves they can be removed only by both Houses of Parliament, or the one House of Parliament, depending on the legislature's structure.

Judges in an adversarial system are impartial in ensuring the fair play of due process, or fundamental justice.

Rather than being written as history, the Deuteronomistic history – Deuteronomy, Joshua, Judges, Samuel and Kings – was intended to illustrate a theological scheme in which Israel and her leaders are judged by their obedience to the teachings and laws ( the covenant ) set down in the book of Deuteronomy.

The events of Judges are set " between c. 1380 and the rise of Saul, c.

By the end of Judges the Israelites are in a worse condition than they were at the beginning, with Yahweh's treasures used to make idolatrous images, the Levites ( priests ) corrupted, the tribe of Dan conquering a remote village instead of the Canaanite cities, and the tribes of Israel making war on the Benjamites, their own brothers.

This is the theme played out in Judges: the people are unfaithful to Yahweh and he therefore delivers them into the hands of their enemies ; the people then repent and entreat Yahweh for mercy, which he sends in the form of a judge ; the judge delivers the Israelites from oppression, but after a while they fall into unfaithfulness again and the cycle is repeated.

The two Books of Samuel () are part of a series of historical books ( Joshua, Judges, Samuel and Kings ) that make up a theological history of the Israelites and affirm and explain God's law for Israel under the guidance of the prophets.

Judges are selected from amongst leading literary critics, writers, academics and leading public figures.

The President and Justices of Appeal are normally from the UK and are Judges of the Court of Appeal of England and Wales.

Judges are appointed by the president.

Several parallel animal fables in Sumerian and Akkadian are among those that Erich Ebeling introduced to modern Western readers ; there are comparable fables from Egypt's Middle Kingdom, and Hebrew fables such as the " king of trees " in Book of Judges 9: 8-15 and " the thistle and the cedar tree " in II Kings 14: 9.

The other High and Appeal Court Judges are the Second Deemster, Deputy Deemster and Judge of Appeal, all of whom are appointed by the Lieutenant Governor.

Judges serve for 4 years and are eligible for re-election.

Judges ’ security of tenure is also guaranteed by the constitutional requirement that the judiciary ’ s salaries are paid from the Consolidated fund and thus the government may not diminish or amend them to their prejudice.

Judges are bound by the law of binding precedent in England and Wales and other common law jurisdictions.

Judges are not bound to impose a sentence within the range of a joint submission, and a judge's disregard for a joint submission is not in itself grounds for the sentence to be altered on appeal.

Judges ' salaries are paid by the state.

Judges are appointed by the Chief Justice of Tanzania, except for those of the Court of Appeal and the High Court, who are appointed by the President.

Whereas the late King James the Second by the Assistance of diverse evill Councellors Judges and Ministers imployed by him did endeavour to subvert and extirpate the Protestant Religion and the Lawes and Liberties of this Kingdome ( list of grievances including ) ... by causing severall good Subjects being Protestants to be disarmed at the same time when Papists were both Armed and Imployed contrary to Law, ( Recital regarding the change of monarch ) ... thereupon the said Lords Spirituall and Temporall and Commons pursuant to their respective Letters and Elections being now assembled in a full and free Representative of this Nation takeing into their most serious Consideration the best meanes for attaining the Ends aforesaid Doe in the first place ( as their Auncestors in like Case have usually done ) for the Vindicating and Asserting their ancient Rights and Liberties, Declare ( list of rights including ) ... That the Subjects which are Protestants may have Arms for their Defence suitable to their Conditions and as allowed by Law.

Judges at all levels are appointed by the president and approved by the Oliy Majlis.

Judges and judicial registrars of the Family Court of Australia wear a black silk gown, a bar jacket with either bands or a jabot and a bench wig.

Judges ' wigs, in everyday use as court dress, are short like barristers ' wigs ( although in a slightly different style ), but for ceremonial occasions judges and also senior barristers ( QCs ) wear full-bottomed wigs.

Judges in the civil and family courts no longer wear traditional dress ; however, Circuit Judges continue to wear their current gown in the county court.

Judges of the Circuit Court also wear similar costume, pursuant to Order 3 rule 1 of the Circuit Court Rules, 2001.

Judges and judicial registrars of the Family Court of Australia wear a black silk gown, a bar jacket with either bands or a jabot and a bench wig.

Judges of the Supreme Courts of the States and Territories of Australia wear court dress similar to that worn by judges of the High Court of England and Wales.

Judges of the Land and Environment Court of New South Wales and judges sitting in the Workers ’ Compensation Court of NSW and the Dust Diseases Tribunal of New South Wales wear the same court dress as a judge of the Supreme Court sitting civilly.

Judges of the District or County Courts of the States of Australia wear court dress similar to that worn by judges of the County Court of England and Wales.

Judges in all Australian courts will not usually wear court dress for procedural or chambers proceedings.

Judges of the Supreme Court of Canada wear red robes with white fur trim on ceremonial occasions together with tricorne hats ; however, they wear black gowns when hearing cases.

Judges of all other federal and provincial courts wear black gowns, sometimes adorned with various sashes and crests which depend on the level of court and the province in which the case is heard.

Judges in the Court of Final Appeal, however, do not wear wigs but only gowns with lace jabot, similar to those of International Court of Justice.

Judges wear white shirts and trousers with a white neck band and a black silk coat.

Judges do not wear wigs.

Judges of the supreme court wear black robes with a red stip with buttons.

Judges of Hong Kong retain many of the English traditions such as wearing wigs and robes in trials.

Furthermore, newly appointed Circuit Judges will no longer receive an allowance to buy full-bottomed wigs.

He supported moves to stop Judges wearing wigs in court.