[permalink] [id link]
Markov's inequality gives an upper bound for the measure of the set ( indicated in red ) where exceeds a given level.
from
Wikipedia
Some Related Sentences
Markov's and inequality
For any randomized trial, some variation from the mean is expected, of course, but the randomization ensures that the experimental groups have mean values that are close, due to the central limit theorem and Markov's inequality.
The term Chebyshev ’ s inequality may also refer to the Markov's inequality, especially in the context of analysis.
Markov's inequality states that for any real-valued random variable Y and any positive number a, we have Pr (| Y | > a ) ≤ E (| Y |)/ a.
One way to prove Chebyshev's inequality is to apply Markov's inequality to the random variable Y = ( X − μ )< sup > 2 </ sup > with a = ( σk )< sup > 2 </ sup >.
Common tools used in the probabilistic method include Markov's inequality, the Chernoff bound, and the Lovász local lemma.
In probability theory, Markov's inequality gives an upper bound for the probability that a non-negative function of a random variable is greater than or equal to some positive constant.
It is named after the Russian mathematician Andrey Markov, although it appeared earlier in the work of Pafnuty Chebyshev ( Markov's teacher ), and many sources, especially in analysis, refer to it as Chebyshev's inequality or Bienaymé's inequality.
Markov's inequality ( and other similar inequalities ) relate probabilities to expectations, and provide ( frequently ) loose but still useful bounds for the cumulative distribution function of a random variable.
An example of an application of Markov's inequality is the fact that ( assuming incomes are non-negative ) no more than 1 / 5 of the population can have more than 5 times the average income.
In the language of measure theory, Markov's inequality states that if ( X, Σ, μ ) is a measure space, ƒ is a measurable extended real-valued function, and, then
Chebyshev's inequality follows from Markov's inequality by considering the random variable
for which Markov's inequality reads
This identity is used in a simple proof of Markov's inequality.
If μ is less than 1, then the expected number of individuals goes rapidly to zero, which implies ultimate extinction with probability 1 by Markov's inequality.
* Markov's inequality and Chebyshev's inequality
Observe that any Las Vegas algorithm can be converted into a Monte Carlo algorithm ( via Markov's inequality ), by having it output an arbitrary, possibly incorrect answer if it fails to complete within a specified time.
* Markov's inequality, a probabilistic upper bound
By an application of Markov's inequality, a Las Vegas algorithm can be converted into a Monte Carlo algorithm via early termination ( assuming the algorithm structure provides for such a mechanism ).
It is a sharper bound than the known first or second moment based tail bounds such as Markov's inequality or Chebyshev inequality, which only yield power-law bounds on tail decay.
Markov's and for
For finite games, and games where the appropriate instance of Markov's rule can be constructively established by means of bar induction, then the non-constructive proof of a winning strategy for the first player can be converted into a winning strategy.
He made his debut for Plamen Markov's Bulgaria in a friendly against Spain on 20 November 2002, when he was a CSKA Sofia player, coming on as a second half substitute during 0 – 1 defeat at Los Cármenes in Granada.
Markov's and .
By Markov's Inequality, the chance that it will yield an answer before we stop it is 1 / 2.
A single-move version of Markov's theorem, was published by.
This is nothing but Markov's inequality.
inequality and gives
The rules are equivalent ( If you divide both sides of inequality TR > TVC by Q gives P > AVC ).
Taking square roots gives the triangle inequality.
Because it can be applied to completely arbitrary distributions ( unknown except for mean and variance ), the inequality generally gives a poor bound compared to what might be possible if something is known about the distribution involved.
The settings a, a ′, b and b ′ are generally in practice chosen to be 0, 45 °, 22. 5 ° and 67. 5 ° respectively — the " Bell test angles " — these being the ones for which the QM formula gives the greatest violation of the inequality.
The special case p = q = 2 gives a form of the Cauchy – Schwarz inequality.
Taking the logarithm of this inequality gives:
In probability theory, the Vysochanskij – Petunin inequality gives a lower bound for the probability that a random variable with finite variance lies within a certain number of standard deviations of the variable's mean, or equivalently an upper bound for the probability that it lies further away.
In probability theory, the Azuma – Hoeffding inequality ( named after Kazuoki Azuma and Wassily Hoeffding ) gives a concentration result for the values of martingales that have bounded differences.
The settings a, a ′, b and b ′ are generally in practice chosen to be 0, 45 °, 22. 5 ° and 67. 5 ° respectively — the " Bell test angles " — these being the ones for which the quantum mechanical formula gives the greatest violation of the inequality.
Any nontrivial line arrangement on RP < sup > 2 </ sup > defines a graph in which each face is bounded by at least three edges, and each edge bounds two faces ; so, double counting gives the additional inequality F ≤ 2E / 3.
Marxist feminism states that private property, which gives rise to economic inequality, dependence, political confusion, and ultimately unhealthy social relations between men and women, is the root of women's oppression in the current social context.
In coding theory, Kraft's inequality, named after Leon Kraft, gives a sufficient condition for the existence of a prefix code and necessary condition for the existence of a uniquely decodable code for a given set of codeword lengths.
Hence the bit strings are prefix codes, and Kraft's inequality gives that.
which also gives rise to the so-called Young's inequality with ε ( valid for every ε > 0 ), sometimes called the Peter – Paul inequality.
Gauss's inequality gives an upper bound on the probability that a value lies more than any given distance from its mode.
Convexity of gives the sufficient and necessary conditions for the proper dissipation inequality:
: ( With at least one that gives a strict inequality )
Integrating this inequality with respect to proper time gives
0.188 seconds.