Mason argued that “ Nazi Germany was always bent at some time upon a major war of expansion ”.

Mason argued that “ Nazi Germany was always bent at some time upon a major war of expansion ” However, Mason that the timing of a such a war was determined by domestic political pressures, especially as relating to a failing economy According to Mason, by 1939, the “ overheating ” of the German economy caused by rearmament, the failure of various rearmament plans caused by the shortages of skilled workers, industrial unrest caused by the breakdown of German social policies, and the a sharp drop in living standards for the German working class forced Hitler into going to war at a time and place not of his choosing in 1939 Mason contented that when faced with the deep socio-economic crisis the Nazi leadership had decided to embark upon a ruthless “ smash and grab ” foreign policy of seizing territory in Eastern Europe which could be pitilessly plundered to support living standards in Germany Mason described German foreign policy as driven by an opportunistic “ next victim ” syndrome after the Anschluss, in which the “ promiscuity of aggressive intentions ” was nurtured by every successful foreign policy move.

Mason argued that “ Nazi Germany was always bent at some time upon a major war of expansion .” However, Mason argued that the timing of a such a war was determined by domestic political pressures, especially as relating to a failing economy, and had nothing to do with what Hitler wanted.

0.004 seconds.