Help


[permalink] [id link]
+
Page "A Theory of Justice" ¶ 6
from Wikipedia
Edit
Promote Demote Fragment Fix

Some Related Sentences

Rawls and believes
Under such constraints, Rawls believes that parties would find his favoured principles of justice to be especially attractive, winning out over varied alternatives, including utilitarian and libertarian accounts.
For example, Rawls believes that " personal property " – personal belongings, a home – constitutes a basic liberty, but an absolute right to unlimited private property is not.

Rawls and principle
To emphasise the general principle that justice should rise from the people and not be dictated by the law-making powers of governments, Rawls asserted that, " There is ... a general presumption against imposing legal and other restrictions on conduct without sufficient reason.
Rawls also argues that the representatives in the original position would adopt the maximin rule as their principle for evaluating the choices before them.
The resultant theory is known as " Justice as Fairness ", from which Rawls derives his two principles of justice: the liberty principle and the difference principle.
Cohen's criticisms are leveled against Rawls ' avowal of inequality under the difference principle, against his application of the principle only to social institutions, and against Rawlsian obsession with the using primary goods as his currency of equality.
The first and most important principle states that every individual has an equal right to basic liberties, Rawls claiming " that certain rights and freedoms are more important or ' basic ' than others ".
However, Rawls also insists, like Popper, that society has a reasonable right of self-preservation that supersedes the principle of tolerance: " While an intolerant sect does not itself have title to complain of intolerance, its freedom should be restricted only when the tolerant sincerely and with reason believe that their own security and that of the institutions of liberty are in danger.
Philosopher John Rawls, in his A Theory of Justice ( 1971 ), developed a " second principle of justice " that economic and social inequalities can only be justified if they benefit the most disadvantaged members of society.
Rawls postulated the difference principle which argued that " inequalities are justified only if needed to improve the lot of the worst off, for example by giving the talented an incentive to create wealth.
It is ... upon this principle that in the end everything rests, and everything comes back to it " ( Durkheim: 1895: 45-as cited from Rawls / Garfinkel: 2002: 2: fn # 2 ).
Rawls states: " According to Garfinkel, the result of Ethnomethodological studies is the fulfillment of Durkheim's promise that the objective reality of social facts is sociology's fundamental principle " ( Rawls / Garfinkel: 2002: 9 ).
Durkheim famously recommended: "... our basic principle, that of the objectivity of social facts " ( Durkheim: 1895 / 1982: S. 45-as cited in Garfinkel / Rawls: 2002: 2: fn # 2 ).

Rawls and would
Rawls argues from this ' original position ' that we would choose exactly the same political liberties for everyone, like freedom of speech, the right to vote and so on.
Rawls asks us to imagine ourselves behind a veil of ignorance that denies us all knowledge of our personalities, social statuses, moral characters, wealth, talents and life plans, and then asks what theory of justice we would choose to govern our society when the veil is lifted, if we wanted to do the best that we could for ourselves.
Rawls argues that each of us would reject the utilitarian theory of justice that we should maximize welfare ( see below ) because of the risk that we might turn out to be someone whose own good is sacrificed for greater benefits for others.
** The Contractarianism of John Rawls, which holds that the moral acts are those that we would all agree to if we were unbiased.
John Rawls ( 1921 – 2002 ) proposed a contractarian approach that has a decidedly Kantian flavour, in A Theory of Justice ( 1971 ), whereby rational people in a hypothetical " original position ", setting aside their individual preferences and capacities under a " veil of ignorance ", would agree to certain general principles of justice and legal organization.
It is worth noting that for many contemporary political philosophers, the rigidity of a particular set of norms, rules, or fixed boundaries about either the way that subjects who would qualify for deliberation are constituted ( a position perhaps epitomized by John Rawls ) or regarding the kinds of argument which qualify as deliberation ( a position perhaps epitomized by Jürgen Habermas ) constitute a foreclosure of deliberation, making it impossible.
Rawls argues that the representative parties in the original position would select two principles of justice:
This song would be covered by Lou Rawls and Tavares before Atlantic Records re-released the Hall & Oates version in 1976.
Rawls applied this technique to his conception of a hypothetical original position from which people would agree to a social contract.
Rawls offers a model of a fair choice situation ( the original position with its veil of ignorance ) within which parties would hypothetically choose mutually acceptable principles of justice.
In particular, Rawls claims that those in the Original Position would all adopt a maximin strategy which would maximise the prospects of the least well-off.
Rawls claims that the parties in the original position would adopt two such principles, which would then govern the assignment of rights and duties and regulate the distribution of social and economic advantages across society.
Rawls seeks to use an argument that the principles of justice are what would be agreed upon if people were in the hypothetical situation of the original position and that those principles have moral weight as a result of that.
The assumptions of the original position, and in particular, the use of maximin reasoning, have also been criticized ( most notably by Kenneth Arrow and John Harsanyi ), with the implication either that Rawls designed the original position to derive the two principles, or that an original position more faithful to its initial purpose would not lead to his favored principles.
Philosopher Allan Bloom, a student of Leo Strauss, criticized Rawls for failing to account for the existence of natural right in his theory of justice, and wrote that Rawls absolutizes social union as the ultimate goal which would conventionalize everything into artifice.
Rawls reasons that people in the original position would want a society where they had their basic liberties protected and where they had some economic guarantees as well.
Rawls justifies the Difference Principle on the basis that, since Fair Equality of Opportunity has lexical priority, the Just choice from Pareto optimal scenarios which could occur would be that benefiting the worst-off rather than the best-off.
A key component of Rawls ' argument is his claim that his Principles of Justice would be chosen by parties in the original position.
Philosopher John Rawls concludes in A Theory of Justice that a just society must tolerate the intolerant, for otherwise, the society would then itself be intolerant, and thus unjust.

Rawls and be
Moral constructivists like John Rawls and Christine Korsgaard may also be realists in this minimalist sense ; the latter describes her own position as procedural realism.
Like the other " backsliders " and all the artists who preferred a secular acclaim to the gospel obscurity ", like Aretha Franklin, Sam Cooke, Lou Rawls, Dinah Washington, Napoleon " Nappy " Brown, Ike and Tina Turner, Brook Benton, Jimmy Witherspoon, and Louis Armstrong, Burke recorded an album of gospel songs, " not to be ' saved ' or under any pressure but for their own pleasure and as a tribute to their roots, because, as kids, all of them, like all black children, had sung in church.
Rawls considered civil disobedience should be viewed as an appeal, warning or admonishment ( showing general respect and fidelity to the rule of law by the non-violence and transparency of methods adopted ) that a law breaches a community's fundamental virtue of justice.
Rawls argues that candidate principles of justice cannot be justified unless they are shown to be stable.
Since 2000 it can be detected in the work of producers such as J Rawls, Nujabes, Fat Jon, Madlib and the English duo The Herbaliser, among others.
: Social and economic inequalities are to be arranged so that ( Rawls, 1971, p. 302 ; revised edition, p. 47 ):
An important consequence here, however, is that inequalities can actually be just on Rawls ' view, as long as they are to the benefit of the least well off.
Wolff argues in this work that Rawls ' theory is an apology for the status quo insofar as it constructs justice from existing practice and forecloses the possibility that there may be problems of injustice embedded in capitalist social relations, private property or the market economy.
The school offers Juris Doctor degrees which can be earned in conjunction with Master of Business Administration or Master of Science degrees through the adjacent Rawls College of Business.
Rawls says that people, not states, form the basic unit that should be examined.
Others, in particular John Rawls, make the distinction between the Good, that is actively creating a better world however that may be defined, and the Just, which creates a fair, liberal social infrastructure that allows the pursuit of virtue, but does not prescribe what the common good actually is.
Even though an example like the one above regarding the orange would not be something that required the practical application of The Categorical Imperative, it is important to draw distinction between Kant and Rawls, and note that Kant's Theory would not necessarily lead to the same problems Rawls ' does-i. e., the cutting in half of the orange.
What this would mean is that the outcome of the Orange's distribution would not be such a simple process for Kant as the reason why it would be wanted by both parties would necessarily have to be a part of the Judgement process, thus eliminating the problem that Rawls ' account suffers here.

0.134 seconds.