Help


[permalink] [id link]
+
Page "Political philosophy" ¶ 35
from Wikipedia
Edit
Promote Demote Fragment Fix

Some Related Sentences

Rawls and used
In his A Theory of Justice, John Rawls used a social contract argument to show that justice, and especially distributive justice, is a form of fairness: an impartial distribution of goods.
The station's longtime slogan, " Chicago's Very Own " ( which has been used since 1983 ), was the basis for a popular image campaign of the 1980s and 1990s, as performed by Lou Rawls.
John Rawls used what amounted to an artificial state of nature.
The original position is a hypothetical state of nature used as a thought experiment to develop Rawls ' theory of justice.
Procedurally fair processes of the type used by Rawls may not leave enough room for judgment, and therefore, reduce the totality of goodness.
Rawls ’ grandmother would order books for his mother, and she used these books to teach her children how to read.

Rawls and thought
According to most contemporary theories of justice, justice is overwhelmingly important: John Rawls claims that " Justice is the first virtue of social institutions, as truth is of systems of thought.
Social contract theories were eclipsed in the nineteenth century in favor of utilitarianism, Hegelianism, and Marxism, and were revived in the twentieth, notably in the form of a thought experiment by John Rawls.
The original position is a hypothetical situation developed by American philosopher John Rawls as a thought experiment to replace the imagery of a savage state of nature of prior political philosophers like Thomas Hobbes.
In his work the Law of Peoples, Rawls applies a modified version of his original position thought experiment to international relationships.
His late work was characterised by a continuing cross-cutting of national intellectual traditions ; for example, some of his latest writing engaged the thought of the American political philosopher John Rawls.
The nature of Rawls ' use of Kant has engendered serious controversy but has demonstrated the vitality of Kantian considerations across a wider range of questions than was once thought plausible.
Thanks to the recent discovery and translations of the dominant schools of liberal thought in the Anglo-American world, as found in the works of Isaiah Berlin, John Rawls and Karl Popper, and an appreciation of older liberal traditions ( Kantian, Millian or Lockean ), a new trend of liberalism has appeared among the younger generation of Iranian intellectuals.

Rawls and original
Rawls argues from this ' original position ' that we would choose exactly the same political liberties for everyone, like freedom of speech, the right to vote and so on.
John Rawls ( 1921 – 2002 ) proposed a contractarian approach that has a decidedly Kantian flavour, in A Theory of Justice ( 1971 ), whereby rational people in a hypothetical " original position ", setting aside their individual preferences and capacities under a " veil of ignorance ", would agree to certain general principles of justice and legal organization.
Rawls specifies that the parties in the original position are concerned only with citizens ' share of what he calls primary social goods, which include basic rights as well as economic and social advantages.
Rawls also argues that the representatives in the original position would adopt the maximin rule as their principle for evaluating the choices before them.
Rawls argues that the representative parties in the original position would select two principles of justice:
Rawls applied this technique to his conception of a hypothetical original position from which people would agree to a social contract.
Rawls offers a model of a fair choice situation ( the original position with its veil of ignorance ) within which parties would hypothetically choose mutually acceptable principles of justice.
Rawls claims that the parties in the original position would adopt two such principles, which would then govern the assignment of rights and duties and regulate the distribution of social and economic advantages across society.
Rawls believes that this principle would be a rational choice for the representatives in the original position for the following reason: Each member of society has an equal claim on their society ’ s goods.
Rawls seeks to use an argument that the principles of justice are what would be agreed upon if people were in the hypothetical situation of the original position and that those principles have moral weight as a result of that.
The assumptions of the original position, and in particular, the use of maximin reasoning, have also been criticized ( most notably by Kenneth Arrow and John Harsanyi ), with the implication either that Rawls designed the original position to derive the two principles, or that an original position more faithful to its initial purpose would not lead to his favored principles.
In reply Rawls has emphasized the role of the original position as a " device of representation " for making sense of the idea of a fair choice situation for free and equal citizens.
To develop his theory of Justice, Rawls places everyone in the original position.
Rawls reasons that people in the original position would want a society where they had their basic liberties protected and where they had some economic guarantees as well.
A key component of Rawls ' argument is his claim that his Principles of Justice would be chosen by parties in the original position.
Noting that Rawls himself acknowledged the failure of his theory of justice to comprehensively address these three frontiers, Nussbaum claims that Rawls's attempt to expand his theory to address one of these areas — transnational justice — is " ultimately unsatisfying " because he fails to follow through with the essential elements developed in A Theory of Justice, namely, by relaxing some of the key assumptions about the parties to the original contract.
The veil of ignorance and the original position are concepts introduced by John Harsanyi and later appropriated by John Rawls in A Theory of Justice.
* John Rawls – political philosopher, author of A Theory of Justice, originator of the concepts of original position and veil of ignorance
Bad faith is important to the concept of original position in John Rawls ’ theory of justice, where mutual commitment of the parties requires that the parties cannot choose and agree to principles in bad faith, in that they have to be able, not just to live with and grudgingly accept, but to sincerely endorse the principles of justice ; a party cannot take risks with principles he knows he will have difficulty voluntarily complying with, or they would be making an agreement in bad faith which is ruled out by the conditions of the original position.

Rawls and position
Moral constructivists like John Rawls and Christine Korsgaard may also be realists in this minimalist sense ; the latter describes her own position as procedural realism.
It is worth noting that for many contemporary political philosophers, the rigidity of a particular set of norms, rules, or fixed boundaries about either the way that subjects who would qualify for deliberation are constituted ( a position perhaps epitomized by John Rawls ) or regarding the kinds of argument which qualify as deliberation ( a position perhaps epitomized by Jürgen Habermas ) constitute a foreclosure of deliberation, making it impossible.
Specifically, Rawls develops what he claims are principles of justice through the use of an artificial device he calls the Original position in which everyone decides principles of justice from behind a veil of ignorance.

Rawls and which
** The Contractarianism of John Rawls, which holds that the moral acts are those that we would all agree to if we were unbiased.
Robert Nozick's 1974 book Anarchy, State, and Utopia, which won a National Book Award, responded to Rawls from a libertarian perspective and gained academic respectability for libertarian viewpoints.
* John Rawls: Revitalized the study of normative political philosophy in Anglo-American universities with his 1971 book A Theory of Justice, which uses a version of social contract theory to answer fundamental questions about justice and to criticise utilitarianism.
Objections to Rawls ' theory include first, its inability to accommodate conscientious objections to the society's basic appreciation of justice or to emerging moral or ethical principles ( such as respect for the rights of the natural environment ) which are not yet part of it and second, the difficulty of predictably and consistently determining that a majority decision is just or unjust.
Rawls argues that human beings have a " sense of justice " which is both a source of moral judgment and moral motivation.
The resultant theory is known as " Justice as Fairness ", from which Rawls derives his two principles of justice: the liberty principle and the difference principle.
In particular, Rawls claims that those in the Original Position would all adopt a maximin strategy which would maximise the prospects of the least well-off.
Rawls ' claim in ( a ) is that departures from equality of a list of what he calls primary goods —" things which a rational man wants whatever else he wants " 1971, pg.
Rawls is also keying on an intuition that a person does not morally deserve their inborn talents ; thus that one is not entitled to all the benefits they could possibly receive from them ; hence, at least one of the criteria which could provide an alternative to equality in assessing the justice of distributions is eliminated.
Although Rawls never retreated from the core argument of A Theory of Justice, he modified his theory substantially in subsequent works such as Justice as Fairness: A Restatement ( 2001 ), in which he clarified and re-organised much of the argument of A Theory of Justice.
Robert Paul Wolff wrote Understanding Rawls: A Critique and Reconstruction of A Theory of Justice, which criticized Rawls from a Marxist perspective, immediately following the publication of A Theory of Justice.
Philosopher Allan Bloom, a student of Leo Strauss, criticized Rawls for failing to account for the existence of natural right in his theory of justice, and wrote that Rawls absolutizes social union as the ultimate goal which would conventionalize everything into artifice.
The Rawls College of Business, which is accredited by the Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business, is the university's business school.
The school offers Juris Doctor degrees which can be earned in conjunction with Master of Business Administration or Master of Science degrees through the adjacent Rawls College of Business.
Rawls justifies the Difference Principle on the basis that, since Fair Equality of Opportunity has lexical priority, the Just choice from Pareto optimal scenarios which could occur would be that benefiting the worst-off rather than the best-off.

0.930 seconds.