* United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

The case was overturned on appeal to the Tenth Circuit and that decision was upheld by the US Supreme Court on January 18, 2012.

:* Carlos Lucero, federal judge on the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Other originalists, including Michael W. McConnell, a federal judge on the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, in his article " Originalism and the Desegregation Decisions ," argue that the Radical Reconstructionists who spearheaded the 14th Amendment were in favor of desegregated southern schools.

The Tenth Circuit was created in 1929 by subdividing the existing Eighth Circuit, and the Eleventh Circuit was created in 1981 by subdividing the existing Fifth Circuit.

* Robert H. Henry, Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals judge

The city lost in the Tenth Circuit.

SCO appealed both decisions, and in August 2009 the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit upheld the monetary damages while reversing and remanding other issues for trial.

On August 24, 2009, the U. S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit reversed the portion of the August 10, 2007 district court summary judgment in SCO v. Novell, that Novell owned the copyright to Unix.

On August 30, 2011, the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit affirmed SCO's loss to Novell in the second jury / bench trial.

The FDA appealed this ruling, and on August 17, 2006 the U. S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit upheld the FDA's ban of ephedra.

These opinions have been confirmed by the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals which, in Fitzgerald v. Mountain States Tel & Tel.

* Michael W. McConnell – constitutional scholar and former Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

For example, Judge Michael W. McConnell of the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit wrote that Congress never " required that the schools of the District of Columbia be segregated.

On August 5, 1940, Roosevelt nominated Murrah to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, to the seat vacated by Robert E. Lewis.

Category: Judges of the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

* 1971-1972 Deanell R. Tacha ; Judge, United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Seal of the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

The United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit ( in case citations, 10th Cir.

Congress passed a statute that placed Minnesota, Iowa, North Dakota, South Dakota, Nebraska, Missouri, and Arkansas in the Eighth Circuit and created a Tenth Circuit that included Wyoming, Colorado, Utah, New Mexico, Kansas, and Oklahoma.

The Tenth Circuit was assigned a total of four judgeships .< ref >

On March 3, 1863, Congress passed a law that removed the circuit court jurisdiction and transferred appeals court jurisdiction to the Tenth Circuit, and in 1866 transferred it again to the Ninth Circuit.

In March 1825 the justices of the inferior court bought land lot 217 in the Tenth District to build the courthouse and the jail.

During the Rehnquist court and to present, the Tenth Amendment to the Constitution has played an integral part in the Court's view of the Commerce Clause.

On August 24, 2009, the U. S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit partially reversed the district court judgment.

SCO appealed the district court judgment to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit on July 7, 2010.

Appeals from this court are heard by the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit ( except for patent claims and claims against the U. S. government under the Tucker Act, which are appealed to the Federal Circuit ).

At trial and on appeal to the Tenth Circuit Creative Gifts ' trademark claims were upheld, and all of UFO's counterclaims were rejected after UFO, which had been representing itself as a pro se defendant, was sanctioned by the court for abuse of discovery.

More recently, the Tenth and Second Circuits have ruled that the term " any court " refers only to U. S. courts.

English author Frederic Harrison wrote Theophano: The Crusade of the Tenth Century ( 1904 ), which portrays Theophano as the arch-schemer of Constantinople who manipulated the court to secure her own position in the face of inconstant Imperial leadership ( the vain and distracted Constantine VII, the drunkard Romanus II, the overly pious Nicephorus Phocas ) and thus largely for the good of the state.

On January 21, 2009 the Tenth Circuit court denied the state's appeal, effectively ending the case.

Although that decision struck down provisions within the Agricultural Adjustment Act as violating the Tenth Amendment, the court found that

On June 21, 2010, the Tenth Circuit reversed the judgment of the district court and remanded with instructions to grant summary judgment in favor of the government, thus upholding the constitutionality of the URAA copyright restoration.

On August 24, 2009, the U. S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit partially reversed Kimball's August 10, 2007 summary judgement, insofar as Kimball had found that Novell owned the copyright to Unix.

The U. S. Supreme Court explained this, in U. S. Public Workers v. Mitchell: " If granted power is found, necessarily the objection of invasion of those rights, reserved by the Ninth and Tenth Amendments, must fail.

In 1992, in New York v. United States, 505 U. S. 144 ( 1992 ), for only the second time in 55 years, the Supreme Court invalidated a portion of a federal law for violating the Tenth Amendment.

In 1997, the Court again ruled that the Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act violated the Tenth Amendment ( Printz v. United States, 521 U. S. 898 ( 1997 )).

Justice Antonin Scalia, writing for the majority, applied New York v. United States to show that the law violated the Tenth Amendment.

In Garcia v. San Antonio Metropolitan Transit Authority ( 1985 ), the Court changed the analytic framework to be applied in Tenth Amendment cases.

In 2011, in Bond v. United States, the U. S. Supreme Court held a criminal defendant has standing to challenge the federal statute that he or she is charged with violating as being unconstitutional under the Tenth Amendment.

This reading would render superfluous the Tenth Amendment's specific mention of powers denied to the government, thereby violating the canon of interpretation that, as most famously articulated by John Marshall in Marbury v. Madison, 5 U. S. ( 1 Cranch ) 137, 174 ," t cannot be presumed that any clause in the constitution is intended to be without effect ; and therefore such construction is inadmissible, unless the words require it.

* 94-1592 U. S. v. Wiles, 95-1022 U. S. v. Schleibaum Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals decision regarding the criminal case

* 14 — The United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit in National Gay Task Force v. Board of Education of the City of Oklahoma City rules that a statute allowing teachers to be fired for " advocating, soliciting, imposing, encouraging or promoting public or private homosexual activity in a manner that creates a substantial risk that such conduct will come to the attention of school children or school employees " is facially overbroad and infringes on First Amendment rights.

The Tenth Amendment was adopted in response to the ruling of the Supreme Court, in the case of Crotty v. An Taoiseach of the same year, that the constitution, as it stood, did not permit the state to ratify the Single European Act.

Missouri v. Holland, 252 U. S. 416 ( 1920 ), the United States Supreme Court held that protection of its quasi-sovereign right to regulate the taking of game is a sufficient jurisdictional basis, apart from any pecuniary interest, for a bill by a State to enjoin enforcement of federal regulations over the subject alleged to be unconstitutional, and that the federal government's ability to make treaties is supreme over any state concerns about such treaties having abrogated any states ' rights arising under the Tenth Amendment.

* Marcus v. Search Warrant, full title Marcus v. Search Warrant of Property at 104 East Tenth Street, Kansas City, Missouri.

Because each of the 50 U. S. states is a separate sovereign free to develop its own tort law under the Tenth Amendment, and because Erie Railroad Co. v. Tompkins ( 1938 ) ruled that there is no general federal common law ( thus implying no general federal tort law ), there are several tests for finding a duty of care in United States tort law.

Perhaps vindicating Hamilton's opinion that, at least in the case of the Tenth Amendment ( an original component of the Bill of Rights he rallied against ), articulating restrictions of federal power were unnecessary, the Supreme Court found in United States v. Sprague ( 1931 ) that