[permalink] [id link]
The Angiosperm Phylogeny Group system ( APG ) of 1998 and APG II ( 2003 ) assigned the Alismatales to the monocots, which may be thought of as an unranked clade containing the families listed below.
from
Wikipedia
Some Related Sentences
Angiosperm and Phylogeny
Up-to-date information on the Asparagales can be found on the Angiosperm Phylogeny Website.
* Asparagales in Angiosperm Phylogeny Website
Successive revisions of the influential Angiosperm Phylogeny Group ( APG ) classification have changed the circumscription of the family.
* ( 2003 ): An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG II.
* ( 2007 ): A linear sequence of Angiosperm Phylogeny Group II families.
Angiosperm Phylogeny Website.
In 1998 the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group published a phylogeny of flowering plants based on an analysis of DNA sequences from most families of flowering plants.
* Angiosperm Phylogeny Group: An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG III.
Under the more recent Angiosperm Phylogeny Group ( APG II ) system, the circumscription of the order is much the same but the families are circumscribed differently.
* Ericaceae at the Angiosperm Phylogeny Website
It is included in the rosid group of the eudicots in the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group II classification system.
The following families are included in the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group system:
The list at the Angiosperm Phylogeny Website is frequently updated.
This expanded circumscription of Malvaceae has been recognized in the most recent version of the Thorne system, by the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group, and in the most recent comprehensive treatment of vascular plant families and genera, the Kubitzki system ( Bayer and Kubitzki, 2003 ).
In order to make a clear break with classification systems being used at that time, the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group resurrected Hutchinson's name, even though his concept of Malpighiales included much of what is now in Celastrales and Oxalidales.
The order Rosales is strongly supported as monophyletic in phylogenetic analyses of DNA sequences, such as those carried out by members of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group.
The following families are included here in newer systems such as that of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group ( APG ):
An example of a modern classification is the one published in 2009 by the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group for all living flowering plant families ( the APG III system ).
Recent genetic research by the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group has shown the duckweeds, previously treated in a separate family Lemnaceae, also belong in the Araceae family.
The family was placed in the Rosid clade, but not classified in an order, by the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group ( APG ).
Leea, sometimes classified in its own family, Leeaceae, is included in Vitaceae by the APG and the Angiosperm Phylogeny Web.
Angiosperm and Group
Formerly treated as the only genus in the family Cuscutaceae, recent genetic research by the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group has shown that it is correctly placed in the morning glory family, Convolvulaceae.
A number of traditionally accepted families, including ( Dialypetalanthaceae, Henriqueziaceae, Naucleaceae, and Theligonaceae ) are now included in Rubiaceae following molecular phylogenetic research by the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group.
The circumscription recognized by the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group ( APG ) includes Apocynaceae ( including Asclepiadaceae ), Gelsemiaceae ( segregated from Loganiaceae ), Gentianaceae ( including Saccifoliaceae ), Loganiaceae, and Rubiaceae.
The order is not recognized by the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group ; the family Hydrostachyaceae is placed in the order Cornales and the plants making up the other two families are included in the family Plantaginaceae.
The Angiosperm Phylogeny Group treats Fabaceae in the broad sense.
The Angiosperm Phylogeny Group usually defines Cornaceae as comprising the genera Cornus and Alangium as well as the five genera often separated into the family Nyssaceae.
Angiosperm and system
The modern Angiosperm Phylogeny Group system places the " cecropiacean " group in the Urticaceae.
Monocot classification has undergone considerable revision in recent years, and some newer systems, including the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group's APG III classification system, have assigned many of these genera to different families based on genetic relationships.
The Angiosperm Phylogeny Group recognized seven families in Ranunculales in their APG III system, published in 2009.
Under the Cronquist classification system, this genus was placed in the family Tiliaceae, but genetic research by the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group has resulted in the incorporation of this family into the Malvaceae.
This circumscription of Aquifoliales was recognized by the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group when they published the APG II system in 2003.
The Angiosperm Phylogeny Group in 1998 and 2003 ( APG and APG II, respectively ) system of flowering plant classification organizes flowering plants into a " selected number of monophyletic suprafamilial groups " and placed Iridaceae in the order Asparagales, which was part of a clade called " Non Commelinoid Monocots ".
In the previous version of their classification system, the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group had included the option of placing Krameria within Zygophyllaceae.
This was not accepted by the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group when they published the APG system in 1998, because the clade consisting of Agapanthus and Amaryllidaceae had only 63 % bootstrap support.
When the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group published the APG II system in 2003, Themidaceae was accepted as an optional family for those who wanted to circumscribe families narrowly in the order Asparagales.
Furthermore, Bombacaceae is no longer recognized by the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group I 1998, II 2003 and Kubitzki system 2003 at the rank of family, the bulk of the taxa in question being treated as subfamily Bombacoideae within family Malvaceae sensu lato.
The Takhtajan system places it in the family Flacourtiaceae, which is considered defunct by the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group.
The Angiosperm Phylogeny Group system does not recognize order Violales ; Violaceae is placed in order Malpighiales and the other families are reassigned to various orders as indicated.
Of these, many, including the type genus Flacourtia, have now been transferred to the Salicaceae in the molecular phylogeny-based classification, known as the APG II system, established by the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group.
The Angiosperm Phylogeny Group ( APG ) in their first 1998 system placed Agapanthus in its own family, Agapanthaceae, while still recognizing the families Amaryllidaceae and Alliaceae.
When the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group published the APG II system in 2003, Themidaceae was treated as an optional circumscription for those who thought that Asparagaceae sensu lato should be divided into smaller segregate families.
The broader version of Hemerocallidaceae is the one that was accepted by the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group when they published the APG II system in 2003.
The former Cronquist system of classification placed this family in the order Violales, but under more modern classifications systems such as that proposed by the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group, this is absorbed into the Malpighiales.
Placement of the family was previously in the Scrophulariales, which has been merged with Lamiales in the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group system.
0.118 seconds.