[permalink] [id link]
The Arminians were perceived as ready to compromise with the Spanish, whereas the Dutch Calvinists were not, so Arminianism was considered by some to be political treason ; in 1617 – 8 there was a pamphlet war and Francis van Aarssens expressed the view that the Arminians were working for Philip IV of Spain.
from
Wikipedia
Some Related Sentences
Arminians and were
This Synod of Dort was open primarily to Dutch Calvinists ( Arminians were excluded ) with Calvinist representatives from other countries, and in 1618 published a condemnation of Arminius and his followers as heretics.
Arminians across Holland were removed from office, imprisoned, banished, and sworn to silence.
The first Baptists – called " General Baptists " because of their confession of a " general " or unlimited atonement, were Arminians.
The Arminians were defeated, resulting in the formulation of the Canons of Dort.
These objections were published in a document called The Remonstrance of 1610, and the Arminians were therefore also known as Remonstrants.
The Arminians would not submit to this plan of procedure because it destroyed their whole scheme of argument [...] and were thus compelled to withdraw.
The name " Socinian " only started to be used in Holland and England as the Latin publications were circulated among early Arminians, Remonstrants, Dissenters, and early English Unitarians from the 1610s onward.
At about the same time that Calvinists and Arminians were debating the meaning of grace in Protestantism, in Catholicism a similar debate was taking place between the Jansenists and the Jesuits.
The life of the Ferrar household was much criticised by Puritans, and they were denounced as Arminians, and their life attacked as a ' Protestant Nunnery '.
This synodical meeting is not to be confused with the better known Second Synod of Dort of 1618, during which Arminians were expelled from the Church and the Canons of Dort were added to the Confessions.
Arminians and with
Most Arminians reconcile human free will with God's sovereignty and foreknowledge by holding three points:
* Total depravity – Arminians agree with Calvinists over the doctrine of total depravity.
* Substitutionary effect of atonement – Arminians also affirm with Calvinists the substitutionary effect of Christ's atonement and that this effect is limited only to the elect.
Classical Arminians would agree with Calvinists that this substitution was penal satisfaction for all of the elect, while most Wesleyan Arminians would maintain that the substitution was governmental in nature.
* Extent of the atonement – Arminians, along with four-point Calvinists or Amyraldians, hold to a universal drawing and universal extent of atonement instead of the Calvinist doctrine that the drawing and atonement is limited in extent to the elect only, which many Calvinists prefer to call ' particular redemption '.
The primary difference is that Arminians interpret the Bible as teaching that the saving work of Jesus Christ is for all people ( general atonement ) but effective only to those who believe in accordance with the Reformation principles of Grace alone and Faith alone.
The Puritans desired a decentralized and more egalitarian church with an emphasis on the laity, while the Arminians wished for ordered church with a firm hierarchy with the bishops on top and an emphasis on divine right and salvation via free will.
" Arminians understand the grace of God as cooperating with one's free will in order to bring an individual to salvation.
Arminians believe that this is compatible with salvation by grace alone, since all the actual saving is done by grace.
He engaged twice in personal disputation with Arminius in the assembly of the States of Holland in 1608, and was one of five Gomarists who met five Arminians or Remonstrants in the same assembly of 1609.
Calvinists frequently use the term " synergism " to describe the Arminian doctrine of salvation, although some Arminians would disagree with the characterisation.
" Arminians of the classical and Wesleyan traditions would respond with the criticism that Hendryx has merely provided a description of the heresy of semi-Pelagianism, and they recognize that grace precedes any cooperation of the human soul with the saving power of God.
Arminians in agreement with the monergist with respect to the prior necessity of grace for regeneration ; strictly speaking, at no time have Arminian theologians, classical or Wesleyan, argued that faith proceeds from the unregenerate ( that is, a totally natural or graceless ) human nature.
Arminians assert that Christ comes to each person with prevenient grace, and if they are willing for him to enter, he enters them.
Many Arminians disagree with this generalization and believe it is libelous to Jacobus Arminius and the Remonstrants, The Anglican defender of Arminianism and Methodism founder, John Wesley, as well as other prominent classical and Wesleyan Arminians, maintain the doctrines of original sin and the total depravity of the human race.
Arminians and whereas
In other words, Arminians believe that they owe their election to their faith, whereas Calvinists believe that they owe their faith to their election.
) Though Lutherans and Catholics share a similar doctrine of the nature of the atonement with Calvinists, they differ on its extent, whereas Arminians and Methodists generally accept an alternate theory of the nature of the atonement such as the moral government theory.
Calvinists understand " dead in sin " to mean absolutely incapable of all good, whereas Arminians understand it to mean the state of being separated from God by sin, but capable of choosing God when enabled to by grace.
Arminians and Dutch
The government of the Dutch Republic, which had instigated the Arminians ' expulsion, subsequently prohibited the Reformed Church from assembling synodically.
Arminians and Calvinists
Twelve years later Holland officially granted Arminianism protection as a religion, although animosity between Arminians and Calvinists continued.
The emerging Baptist movement in 17th-century England, for example, was a microcosm of the historic debate between Calvinists and Arminians.
He spent much time in the Netherlands, and is noted for his involvement in the controversy between the Calvinists and the Arminians.
It settled a theological dispute between the orthodox Calvinists and the liberal Arminians that had brought the country on the brink of civil war.
With the religious troubles between Gomarists ( Calvinists ) and Arminians, the struggle between Van Oldenbarnevelt and Maurice reached a climax.
While Arminians feel that they have been rather successful in disinclining many Calvinists from such views as unconditional election, limited atonement, and irresistible grace, they realize that they have not widely succeeded in the area of eternal security.
And that ' something else ' is why Calvinists believe Arminians and other non-Augustinian groups to be synergists.
He took an important part in the quarrels between the Arminians and the Calvinists under Franciscus Gomarus.
" Should it be asked, whether all Calvinists differ from Arminians, only in reference to effectual grace and perseverance, it is frankly acknowledged, that there are some who differ from them in other points.
Arminians, Classic Calvinists, High Calvinists, and Hyper Calvinists.
Arminians and so
1: 10, " Therefore, brethren, be the more zealous to confirm your call and election, for if you do this you will never fall ," Arminians still seek to nourish and encourage believers so that they might remain in a saved state.
Such Arminians largely comprise the eight million or so Christians who today constitute the Christian Holiness Association ( the Salvation Army, the Church of the Nazarene, the Wesleyan Church, etc.
Arminians believe that humans are only capable of receiving salvation when first enabled to do so by prevenient grace, which they believe is distributed to everyone.
0.129 seconds.