Help


[permalink] [id link]
+
Page "Discrete mathematics" ¶ 17
from Wikipedia
Edit
Promote Demote Fragment Fix

Some Related Sentences

truth and values
Agnosticism is the view that the truth values of certain claims — especially claims about the existence or non-existence of any deity, but also other religious and metaphysical claims — are unknown and ( so far as can be judged ) unknowable.
Scheme uses the special values # t and # f to represent truth and falsity.
* Meta-ethics, about the theoretical meaning and reference of moral propositions and how their truth values ( if any ) may be determined ;
For example, a moral universalist ( and certainly an absolutist ) might argue that, just as one can discuss what is ' good and evil ' at an individual's level, so too can one make certain " moral " propositions with truth values relative at the level of the species.
The origin of the goes back to Gottfried Leibniz, who in the seventeenth century, after having constructed a successful mechanical calculating machine, dreamt of building a machine that could manipulate symbols in order to determine the truth values of mathematical statements.
A property has only to assign truth values to those objects that exist in a particular world.
#* This is done by first noting that a sentence such as is either refutable or has some model in which it holds ; this model is simply assigning truth values to the subpropositions from which B is built.
Jewish ethical practice is typically understood to be marked by values such as justice, truth, peace, loving-kindness ( chesed ), compassion, humility, and self-respect.
Traditionally, in Aristotle's classical logical calculus, in evaluating any proposition there are only two possible truth values, " true " and " false.
It is easy to check that the sentence must receive at least one of the n truth values ( and not a value that is not one of the n ).
To avoid self-contradiction, it is necessary when discussing truth values to envision levels of languages, each of which can predicate truth ( or falsehood ) only of languages at a lower level.
If " this statement is false " is denoted by A and its truth value is being sought, it is necessary to find a condition that restricts the choice of possible truth values of A.
Truth-functional propositional logic is a propositional logic whose interpretation limits the truth values of its propositions to two, usually true and false.
For any two propositions, there are four possible assignments of truth values:
However, in the untyped lambda calculus, there's no way to prevent our function from being applied to truth values, or strings, for instance.
* Interpretation ( logic ), a model is ( part of ) an interpretation of facts in logic, a mapping of truth values to sentences.
" Gandhi's early self-identification with truth and love as supreme values is traceable to these epic characters.
In set theory and logic, a relation is a property that assigns truth values to k-tuples of individuals.
Prescriptivism is also supported by Imperative logic, in which there are no truth values for imperatives, and by the idea of the Naturalistic fallacy: even if someone could prove the existence of an ethical property and express it in a factual statement, he could never derive any command from this statement, so the search for ethical properties is pointless.
In Boolean-valued semantics ( for classical propositional logic ), the truth values are the elements of an arbitrary Boolean algebra, " true " corresponds to the maximal element of the algebra, and " false " corresponds to the minimal element.
Intermediate elements of the algebra correspond to truth values other than " true " and " false ".

truth and logical
Husserl also talked about what he called " logic of truth " which consists of the formal laws of possible truth and its modalities, and precedes the third logical third stratum.
Husserl responds by saying that truth itself as well as logical laws always remain valid regardless of psychological " evidence " that they are true.
On one extreme is logical positivism, which denies the validity of any beliefs held by faith ; on the other extreme is fideism, which holds that true belief can only arise from faith, because reason and physical evidence cannot lead to truth.
It puts one in the position of asserting or implying that truth or standards of logical consistency are relative to a particular thinker or group and that under some other standard, the position is correct despite its failure to stand up to logic.
In logic, a logical connective ( also called a logical operator or a truth function ) is a symbol or word used to connect two or more sentences ( of either a formal or a natural language ) in a grammatically valid way, such that the sense of the compound sentence produced depends only on the original sentences.
The and in ( C ) is a logical connective, since the truth of ( C ) is completely determined by ( A ) and ( B ): it would make no sense to affirm ( A ) and ( B ) but deny ( C ).
The verifiability criterion of meaning did not seem verifiable ; but neither was it simply a logical tautology, since it had implications for the practice of science and the empirical truth of other statements.
The logical calculus preserves justification, rather than truth, across transformations yielding derived propositions.
# A deity is able to do anything that is in accord with its own nature ( thus, for instance, if it is a logical consequence of a deity's nature that what it speaks is truth, then it is not able to lie ).
The logical predicate thus obtained would be elaborated further, e. g. using truth theory models, which ultimately relate meanings to a set of Tarskiian universals, which may lie outside the logic.
The truth of a sentence, and more interestingly, its logical relation to other sentences, is then evaluated relative to a model.
The opposite of truth is falsehood, which, correspondingly, can also take on a logical, factual, or ethical meaning.
Logicians use formal languages to express the truths which they are concerned with, and as such there is only truth under some interpretation or truth within some logical system.
A logical truth ( also called an analytic truth or a necessary truth ) is a statement which is true in all possible worlds or under all possible interpretations, as contrasted to a fact ( also called a synthetic claim or a contingency ) which is only true in this world as it has historically unfolded.
A proposition such as " If p and q, then p ." is considered to be logical truth because it is true because of the meaning of the symbols and words in it and not because of any facts of any particular world.
In logic, Ockham wrote down in words the formulae that would later be called De Morgan's Laws, and he pondered ternary logic, that is, a logical system with three truth values ; a concept that would be taken up again in the mathematical logic of the 19th and 20th centuries.
Since it is absurd to have no logical method by which to settle on one hypothesis amongst an infinite number of equally data-compliant hypotheses, we should choose the simplest theory: " either science is irrational the way it judges theories and predictions probable or the principle of simplicity is a fundamental synthetic a priori truth " ( Swinburne 1997 ).
Given these assumptions, the constraint that time travel must not lead to inconsistent outcomes could be seen merely as a tautology, a self-evident truth that cannot possibly be false, because if you make the assumption that it is false this would lead to a logical paradox.

truth and formulas
The series of formulas which is constructed within such a system is called a derivation and the last formula of the series is a theorem, whose derivation may be interpreted as a proof of the truth of the proposition represented by the theorem.
Since every formula in the antecedent ( the left side ) must be true to conclude the truth of at least one formula in the succedent ( the right side ), adding formulas to either side results in a weaker sequent, while removing them from either side gives a stronger one.
The truth conditions for quantified formulas are given purely in terms of truth with no appeal to domains whatsoever ( and hence its name truth-value semantics ).
In proof theory, the semantic tableau ( or truth tree ) is a decision procedure for sentential and related logics, and a proof procedure for formulas of first-order logic.
Wilfrid Hodges ( 1997 ) gives a compositional semantics for it in part by having the truth clauses for IF formulas quantify over sets of assignments rather than just assignments ( as the usual truth clauses do ).
Only the truth clauses for atomic and for quantificational formulas differ from those of the standard semantics.
The truth values of the atomic formulas can be used to reconstruct the truth values of more complicated formulas, using the structure of the Boolean algebra.
For example, if φ ( x ) and ψ ( y, z ) are formulas with one and two free variables, respectively, and if a, b, c are elements of the model's universe to be substituted for x, y, and z, then the truth value of
The completeness of the Boolean algebra is required to define truth values for quantified formulas.

0.248 seconds.