Help


[permalink] [id link]
+
Page "Netlist" ¶ 21
from Wikipedia
Edit
Promote Demote Fragment Fix

Some Related Sentences

Then and suppose
Indeed, following, suppose ƒ is a complex function defined in an open set Ω ⊂ C. Then, writing for every z ∈ Ω, one can also regard Ω as an open subset of R < sup > 2 </ sup >, and ƒ as a function of two real variables x and y, which maps Ω ⊂ R < sup > 2 </ sup > to C. We consider the Cauchy – Riemann equations at z = 0 assuming ƒ ( z ) = 0, just for notational simplicity – the proof is identical in general case.
For instance, suppose that each input is an integer z in the range 0 to N − 1, and the output must be an integer h in the range 0 to n − 1, where N is much larger than n. Then the hash function could be h
“ And that Christ being Lord, and God the Son of God, and appearing formerly in power as Man, and Angel, and in the glory of fire as at the bush, so also was manifested at the judgment executed on Sodom, has been demonstrated fully by what has been said .” Then I repeated once more all that I had previously quoted from Exodus, about the vision in the bush, and the naming of Joshua ( Jesus ), and continued: “ And do not suppose, sirs, that I am speaking superfluously when I repeat these words frequently: but it is because I know that some wish to anticipate these remarks, and to say that the power sent from the Father of all which appeared to Moses, or to Abraham, or to Jacob, is called an Angel because He came to men ( for by Him the commands of the Father have been proclaimed to men ); is called Glory, because He appears in a vision sometimes that cannot be borne ; is called a Man, and a human being, because He appears arrayed in such forms as the Father pleases ; and they call Him the Word, because He carries tidings from the Father to men: but maintain that this power is indivisible and inseparable from the Father, just as they say that the light of the sun on earth is indivisible and inseparable from the sun in the heavens ; as when it sinks, the light sinks along with it ; so the Father, when He chooses, say they, causes His power to spring forth, and when He chooses, He makes it return to Himself.
#* Proof: suppose that p is composite, hence can be written with a and Then is prime, but and contradicting statement 1.
Then S is not a base for any topology on R. To show this, suppose it were.
Let us suppose that L is a complete lattice and let f be a monotonic function from L into L. Then, any x ′ such that f ′( x ′) ≤ x ′ is an abstraction of the least fixed-point of f, which exists, according to the Knaster – Tarski theorem.
:- Then you set to work, I suppose, to have moats dug, and ramparts thrown up, and watch towers erected, and strongholds built, and stores of food collected?
By Pauli's exclusion principle, both the particles after scattering have to lie above the Fermi surface, with energies Now, suppose the initial electron has energy very close to the Fermi surface Then, we have that also have to be very close to the Fermi surface.
To show this, suppose that x is a square root of 1 modulo p. Then:
We can use this fact to prove part of a famous result: for any prime p such that p ≡ 1 ( mod 4 ) the number (− 1 ) is a square ( quadratic residue ) mod p. For suppose p = 4k + 1 for some integer k. Then we can take m = 2k above, and we conclude that
Then, when discussing the islands around Britain in Book IV, Chapter 16, he writes: " The farthest of all, which are known and spoke of, is Thule ; in which there be no nights at all, as we have declared, about mid-summer, namely when the Sun passes through the sign Cancer ; and contrariwise no days in mid-winter: and each of these times they suppose, do last six months, all day, or all night.
Second, suppose η: F → G is a natural transformation from the left exact functor F to the left exact functor G. Then natural transformations R < sup > i </ sup > η: R < sup > i </ sup > F → R < sup > i </ sup > G are induced, and indeed R < sup > i </ sup > becomes a functor from the functor category of all left exact functors from A to B to the full functor category of all functors from A to B.
Let φ: M → N be a smooth map between ( smooth ) manifolds M and N, and suppose f: N → R is a smooth function on N. Then the pullback of f by φ is the smooth function φ < sup >*</ sup > f on M defined by
In symbols, let A be a Noetherian local ring with maximal ideal m, and suppose a < sub > 1 </ sub >, ..., a < sub > n </ sub > is a minimal set of generators of m. Then in general n ≥ dim A, and A is defined to be regular if n = dim A.
For the induction step, suppose the multinomial theorem holds for m. Then
For concreteness let us also suppose time is a parameter that ranges over the set of real numbers R. Then time evolution is given by a family of bijective state transformations
To see why this is true, suppose x ∈ X is the state at time s. Then by the definition of F, F < sub > t, s </ sub >( x ) is the state of the system at time t and consequently applying the definition once more, F < sub > u, t </ sub >( F < sub > t, s </ sub >( x )) is the state at time u.
* " Then you suppose nonsense ," said he.

Then and definition
) Then X < sub > i </ sub > is the value ( or realization ) produced by a given run of the process at time i. Suppose that the process is further known to have defined values for mean μ < sub > i </ sub > and variance σ < sub > i </ sub >< sup > 2 </ sup > for all times i. Then the definition of the autocorrelation between times s and t is
Then the equivalence class of the pair can be identified with the rational number, and this equivalence relation and its equivalence classes can be used to give a formal definition of the set of rational numbers.
Then, the definition of a square may be recast with that abstraction as its genus:
Then, the definition of a square may be recast with that abstraction as its genus:
Then a general definition of isomorphism that covers the previous and many other cases is: an isomorphism is a morphism that has an inverse, i. e. there exists a morphism with and.
The algorithm for deciding this is conceptually simple: it constructs ( the description of ) a new program t taking an argument n which ( 1 ) first executes program a on input i ( both a and i being hard-coded into the definition of t ), and ( 2 ) then returns the square of n. If a ( i ) runs forever, then t will never get to step ( 2 ), regardless of n. Then clearly, t is a function for computing squares if and only if step ( 1 ) terminates.
* Then extend the definition of truth to include sentences that predicate truth or falsity of one of the original subset of sentences.
Then by definition, torque τ = r × F.
Then, thus by T, which means w R w using the definition of.
Then x is an interior point of S if there exists a neighbourhood of x which is contained in S. Note that this definition does not depend upon whether neighbourhoods are required to be open.
Then the dasher writes the definition of the word ( as supplied on the card ) on a piece of paper.
Then n is palindromic if and only if a < sub > i </ sub > = a < sub > k − i </ sub > for all i. Zero is written 0 in any base and is also palindromic by definition.
Then by the definition of h.
Then we obtain the definition of a product.
Then a C-valued presheaf on X is the same as a contravariant functor from O ( X ) to C. This definition can be generalized to the case when the source category is not of the form O ( X ) for any X ; see presheaf ( category theory ).
Then follows a lengthened elucidation of the axiom that nothing can be produced from nothing, and that nothing can be reduced to nothing ( Nil fieri ex nihilo, in nihilum nil posse reverti ); which is succeeded by a definition of the Ultimate Atoms, infinite in number, which, together with Void Space ( Inane ), infinite in extent, constitute the universe.
Then, recalling the definition of:
Then the intersection number of two closed curves on X has a simple definition in terms of an integral.
Then one sets,, so that by definition, is the ratio of dy by dx.
Then using the rules in the definition, we find that for general vector fields and we get
Then, by the definition of.
Then followed 23 anathemas directed against Arius and his doctrines, succeeded by the creeds of Nicaea and Constantinople and the definition of Chalcedon, the whole being subscribed by 8 Arian bishops with their clergy, and by all the Gothic nobles.
Then, and, where is the set of curves given by the first definition at the beginning of this document.

0.766 seconds.