They argue further ( and somewhat contradictorily ) that our knowledge and resources in preventive medicine would make it possible to control such an outbreak of disease.

They argue that the oldest copies of this text family are likely to have been lost or destroyed over time with use, and therefore extant manuscripts cannot accurately date a text family.

They argue that his ascension to the station of bishop in Alexandria occurred under questionable circumstances.

They argue that Banquo is merely setting aside his sword for the night.

They argue that genes determine the architecture of a learning system, but that specific " facts " about how grammar works can only be learned as a result of experience.

They argue that the abuse of casuistry is the problem, not casuistry per se ( itself an example of casuistic reasoning ).

They also argue that satellite radio will boost Canadian culture by giving vital exposure to independent artists, instead of concentrating just on the country's stars, and point to the CRTC's successful extraction of promises to program 10 % Canadian content on satellite services already operational in the United States as important concessions.

They further argue that government encouragement of content filtering, or legal requirements for content-labeling software, would be equivalent to censorship.

They argue that there is a chance for the content-filtering software to be abused.

They argue that distinct selves can have perceptions that stand in relations of similarity and causality with one another.

They argue that although the price of oil went back down in the 1980s, there was no corresponding deflation.

They argue that some, if not all, of the cost difference between public and private schools comes from a process known as cream skimming — selecting only those students that belong to a preferred economic, religious, or ethnic group — rather than from differences in administration.

They argue that accurate, independent reasoning distinguishes the developed or educated mind and they thus stress the development of this faculty.

They argue that when most of the Oldowan tools were found in association with human fossils, Homo was always present, but Paranthropus was not.

They argue that nations and races must purge themselves of socially and biologically weak or degenerate people, while simultaneously promoting the creation of strong people, in order to survive in a world defined by perpetual national and racial conflict.

They argue, for example, that feminism often promotes misandry and the elevation of women's interests above men's, and criticize radical feminist positions as harmful to both men and women.

They argue that the measure " heritability " includes both a direct effect of the genotype on IQ and also indirect effects such that the genotype changes the environment, thereby affecting IQ.

They also argue that binding massive amounts of investments on nuclear energy would take funding away from more effective solutions.

They argue that the disciple who formed this community was both an historical person and a companion of Jesus Christ.

They further argue that UV light also is poorly reflected from soil and dull surfaces.

They argue that we own our bodies which are the laborers, this right of ownership extends to what we create.

They argue such an analogy fails because physical property is generally rivalrous while intellectual works are non-rivalrous ( that is, if one makes a copy of a work, the enjoyment of the copy does not prevent enjoyment of the original ).

They do argue, however, that to base a concept of intelligence on IQ test scores alone is to ignore many important aspects of mental ability.

They argue that the phenomenon of the global spread of English is better understood in the framework of appropriation ( e. g. Spichtinger 2000 ), that is, English used for local purposes around the world.

They argue that the American constitution owes as much or more to the English Liberal philosopher John Locke's emphasis on the rights of property and to Montesquieu's theories of the separation of powers.

They had been seen as soon as they left the ranch, picked out of the darkness by the weary though watchful eyes of two men posted a few hundred yards away in the windless shelter of the trees.

They weren't sleeping, of course, but they thought they were doing him a favor by pretending.

They had the house cleaned up by noon, and Wilson sent the boy out to the meadow to bring in the horses.

They, and the two large fans which I could dimly see as daylight filtered through their vents, down at the far end of the hall, could be turned on by a master switch situated inside the office.

They were sitting on their heels, rider-fashion, over by the still empty calf wagon.

They could no longer afford the luxury of the canvas sweat bag that cooled it by evaporation.

They were engulfed by the weird silence, broken only by the low, angry murmur of the river.

They are supplied, a batch at a time, by a secret source and are continually changed by Wisman or his staff, at random intervals.

They are huge areas which have been swept by winds for so many centuries that there is no soil left, but only deep bare ridges fifty or sixty yards apart with ravines between them thirty or forty feet deep and the only thing that moves is a scuttling layer of sand.

They recognized that slavery was a moral issue and not merely an economic interest, and that to recognize it explicitly in their Constitution would be in explosive contradiction to the concept of sovereignty they had set forth in the Declaration of 1776 that `` all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among them are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.

They, perhaps, gave the pitch of their position in the preface where it was said that Eisenhower requested that the Commission be administered by the American Assembly of Columbia University, because it was non-partisan.

While convalescing in his Virginia home he wrote a book recording his prison experiences and escape, entitled: They Shall Not Have Me Published originally in ( Helion's ) English by Dutton & Co. of New York, in 1943, the book was received by the press as a work of astonishing literary power and one of the most realistic accounts of World War 2, from the French side.

On December 21, the day that the Irish House of Commons petitioned for removal of Sir Constantine Phipps, their Tory Lord Chancellor, Molesworth reportedly made this remark on the defense of Phipps by Convocation: `` They that have turned the world upside down, are come hither also ''.

They were repelled by his noisy newspapers, his personal publicity, his presumptuous campaign for the Presidential nomination, and by the swelling cloud of rumor about his moral lapses.

They emerged as interchangeable cogs in a faulty but formidable machine: shaved nearly naked, hair queued, greatcoated, jackbooted, and best of all -- in the opinion of the British professional, Major Semple-Lisle -- `` their minds are not estranged from the paths of obedience by those smatterings of knowledge which only serve to lead to insubordination and mutiny ''.

They both measure literature by moral standards, and in their political writings both allow for censorship, but the differences between them are also significant.

They even accept the `` double standard '' of sex morality in a double sense, i.e., both sexes agree that standards for men differ from standards for women, and women apply to both sexes a standard different from that held by men.

They had risen from humble beginnings by their own diligence and astuteness, they were unfettered by the codes that bound nobles like Othon or even the older generation of clerks like Hotham, and they were working for an end that their opponents had never even visualized.

They, however much they were in disagreement with the late Victorians over the method by which Britain was Germanized, agreed with them that the end result was the complete extinction of the previous Celtic population and civilization.

They react in obedience to an instinct or urge which has itself been impelled by natural law.