They argue further ( and somewhat contradictorily ) that our knowledge and resources in preventive medicine would make it possible to control such an outbreak of disease.

They argue that the oldest copies of this text family are likely to have been lost or destroyed over time with use, and therefore extant manuscripts cannot accurately date a text family.

They argue that his ascension to the station of bishop in Alexandria occurred under questionable circumstances.

They argue that Banquo is merely setting aside his sword for the night.

They argue that genes determine the architecture of a learning system, but that specific " facts " about how grammar works can only be learned as a result of experience.

They argue that the abuse of casuistry is the problem, not casuistry per se ( itself an example of casuistic reasoning ).

They also argue that satellite radio will boost Canadian culture by giving vital exposure to independent artists, instead of concentrating just on the country's stars, and point to the CRTC's successful extraction of promises to program 10 % Canadian content on satellite services already operational in the United States as important concessions.

They further argue that government encouragement of content filtering, or legal requirements for content-labeling software, would be equivalent to censorship.

They argue that there is a chance for the content-filtering software to be abused.

They argue that distinct selves can have perceptions that stand in relations of similarity and causality with one another.

They argue that although the price of oil went back down in the 1980s, there was no corresponding deflation.

They argue that some, if not all, of the cost difference between public and private schools comes from a process known as cream skimming — selecting only those students that belong to a preferred economic, religious, or ethnic group — rather than from differences in administration.

They argue that accurate, independent reasoning distinguishes the developed or educated mind and they thus stress the development of this faculty.

They argue that when most of the Oldowan tools were found in association with human fossils, Homo was always present, but Paranthropus was not.

They argue that nations and races must purge themselves of socially and biologically weak or degenerate people, while simultaneously promoting the creation of strong people, in order to survive in a world defined by perpetual national and racial conflict.

They argue, for example, that feminism often promotes misandry and the elevation of women's interests above men's, and criticize radical feminist positions as harmful to both men and women.

They argue that the measure " heritability " includes both a direct effect of the genotype on IQ and also indirect effects such that the genotype changes the environment, thereby affecting IQ.

They also argue that binding massive amounts of investments on nuclear energy would take funding away from more effective solutions.

They argue that the disciple who formed this community was both an historical person and a companion of Jesus Christ.

They further argue that UV light also is poorly reflected from soil and dull surfaces.

They argue that we own our bodies which are the laborers, this right of ownership extends to what we create.

They argue such an analogy fails because physical property is generally rivalrous while intellectual works are non-rivalrous ( that is, if one makes a copy of a work, the enjoyment of the copy does not prevent enjoyment of the original ).

They do argue, however, that to base a concept of intelligence on IQ test scores alone is to ignore many important aspects of mental ability.

They argue that the phenomenon of the global spread of English is better understood in the framework of appropriation ( e. g. Spichtinger 2000 ), that is, English used for local purposes around the world.

They argue that the American constitution owes as much or more to the English Liberal philosopher John Locke's emphasis on the rights of property and to Montesquieu's theories of the separation of powers.

They recognized that slavery was a moral issue and not merely an economic interest, and that to recognize it explicitly in their Constitution would be in explosive contradiction to the concept of sovereignty they had set forth in the Declaration of 1776 that `` all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among them are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.

They will seek to eliminate conflict in their international economic policies and will encourage economic collaboration between any and all of them ''.

They realize that by acting in concert, rather than individually, they will not be picked out as objects of retaliation -- economic and otherwise.

They survive only when they can recruit social and economic peers.

They help Armenia sustain double-digit economic growth and finance its massive trade deficit.

They made a virtue of qualities that made for economic success: self-reliance, frugality, industry, and energy, and through them influenced modern social and economic life.

They vary by country and region in their institutional makeup and by their economic policies.

They generally differ from paleoconservatives, in that they are in favor of more personal and economic freedom.

They are vehemently opposed to environmental regulations, corporate welfare, subsidies, and other areas of economic intervention.

They focused on social and economic injustices affecting the baekjeong, hoping to create an egalitarian Korean society.

They eventually reached an agreement, and the planned target for economic growth in the Second Five-Year Plan was reduced from 19 % to 16. 5 %.

They further called for an increased application of the gospel to the sociological, political, and economic areas.

They also anticipated what would become known decades later as the " human security " paradigm in social science and economic development.

They proposed – among others – that in a fully competitive economic environment ( as they thought was the case of ecosystems ) the most potent individuals would thrive and in turn society would prosper ( in analogy to the observed biodiversity and abundance of life on earth ).

They are the descendants of economic migrants that came to Gibraltar after the majority of the Spanish population left in 1704.

They had combined both political and economic interests.

They accelerated only after May 1926, because of an increase in Polish exports by sea, economic prosperity, the outbreak of the German – Polish trade war which reverted most Polish international trade to sea routes, and also thanks to the personal engagement of Eugeniusz Kwiatkowski, Polish Minister of Industry and Trade, also responsible for construction of Centralny Okręg Przemysłowy.

They deliberately avoided social, economic, and cultural topics because they might undermine the national political development which their writing celebrated.

They propose that this economic system be executed in a manner that attempts to maximize the liberty of individuals and minimize concentration of power or authority ( libertarianism ).

They claim that the underlying economic motivation eroded any claims of moral superiority, leaving the hostile acts in ( Korea, Hungary, Cuban missile crisis, Vietnam, Afghanistan, Nicaragua ) to stand on their own in justifying the human lives the conflicts had destroyed.

They accepted the need for a prince to be concerned with reputation, and even a need for cunning and deceit, but compared to Machiavelli, and like later modernist writers, they emphasized economic progress much more than the riskier ventures of war.

They said Ukraine, Belorussia and the Baltic States would end up as only a further economic burden for Germany.