They argued that a new type of political force was needed to challenge the Conservative Party.

They argued that misogyny is a better explanation than polygyny.

They have also argued that, while the modern Communist Party may be flawed, it is comparatively better than previous regimes, with respect to improving the general standard of living, than any other government that has governed China in the past century and can be seen in a more favourable light compared with most governments of the developing nations.

They argued that the Old Covenant required a priest to mediate between God and humanity, but that New Covenant explicitly abolishes the need for priestly role by making every Christian a priest with direct access to God's grace.

They argued that the Knights were perfectly justified in their crusade as it was a sacred duty of Christians to spread the true faith.

They argued that ancient precedent was not sufficient, because " the people were sovereign.

They have argued that his removal was necessary for future stability in the island nation.

They argued that existing neural models had failed to produce intelligent behaviour because they were too small, and that in order to create " artificial brains " it was necessary to manually assemble tens of thousands of evolved neural modules together, with the billion neuron " CAM-Brain " requiring around 10 million modules ; this idea was rejected by Igor Aleksander, who said " The point is that these puzzles are not puzzles because our neural models are not large enough.

They argued that China had controls in place and the sale might depress prices.

They argued that the Constitution was a " compact " or agreement among the states.

" They argued that " genuine freedom and individuality could only exist in a free society " and that in contrast to " misanthropic bourgeois individualism " anarchism was based in " a deep love of freedom, understood as a social product, a deep respect for human rights, a profound celebration of humankind and its potential and a commitment to a form of society where a ' true individuality ' was irrevocably linked to ' the highest communist socieability '"

They also argued that crucifixion was a standard form of execution in ancient times and not just one especially reserved for Jesus.

They argued that the negative employment effects of minimum wage laws are minimal if not non-existent.

They argued that the different policy views were not related to views on whether raising the minimum wage would reduce teen employment ( the median economist said there would be a reduction of 1 %), but on value differences such as income redistribution.

They argued that under such conditions, the reduced danger to the climate is obvious, and this held even if cities were targeted, for there was less likelihood of mass fires.

They argued that by signing to major labels and appearing on MTV, punk bands like Green Day were buying into a system that punk was created to challenge.

They opposed the supremacy of the monarch in the church ( Erastianism ), and argued that the only head of the Church in heaven or earth is Christ.

They argued even further that morality or immorality of any action could not be judged outside of the cultural context within which it occurred.

They argued that men dominated women not so much for material benefits as for the ego satisfaction intrinsic in domination.

They argued that women have always had the same obligations as men.

They argued that as scientists they had a duty to uncover the truth whether that was politically correct or not.

They argued that sociobiology does not necessarily lead to any particular political ideology, as many critics implied.

* They argue that the Dogmatic Constitution Pastor æternus concerns the permanence of the primacy of the Holy See over the universal church and condemns as heretical the propositions that the authority granted to St. Peter by Christ either was abolished after his death or devolved to the college of bishops, both positions that were argued by Orthodox theologians.

They argued that this was a response to attacks by counter-revolutionary forces.

They argued that popular support was expressed in the insurrection and that further appeals to popular support would be a waste of scarce resources.

They dug up a speech he had made two years earlier as a Congressman, decrying the more than two hundred statues, monuments, and memorials which `` dot the Washington landscape as patriotic societies and zealous friends are constantly hatching new plans ''.

They may be as basic as pictures on a board that the are used to request food, drink, or other care ; or they can be advanced speech generating devices, based on speech synthesis, that are capable of storing hundreds of phrases and words.

They saw to it that he received an excellent education at the Collège des Quatre-Nations, but he was never a good student: he had a facial tumor that impeded his speech, and he was always preoccupied with drawing.

They are self-conscious about speaking formally and their rhetoric is shown to be flawed, as if Euripides was exploring the problematical nature of language and communication: " For speech points in three different directions at once, to the speaker, to the person addressed, to the features in the world it describes, and each of these directions can be felt as skewed.

They distinguish between ( private ) speech in tongues when receiving the gift of the Spirit, and ( public ) speech in tongues for the benefit of the church.

They would include the withdrawal of toleration of speech and assembly from groups and movements which promote aggressive policies, armament, chauvinism, discrimination on the grounds of race and religion, or which oppose the extension of public services, social security, medical care, etc "

They are regularly repeated on the digital speech station BBC Radio 4 Extra and are available on audio CD.

They claim that liberal ideas of free speech are repressive, arguing that such " Marcusean logic " is the base of speech codes, which are seen by some as censorship, in US universities.

They sometimes appear alone or interwoven within a speech.

They defined parts of speech, analyzed poetry, parsed close synonyms, invented argumentation strategies, and debated the nature of reality.

They can include delusions, disordered thoughts and speech, and tactile, auditory, visual, olfactory and gustatory hallucinations, typically regarded as manifestations of psychosis.

They commonly include flat or blunted affect and emotion, poverty of speech ( alogia ), inability to experience pleasure ( anhedonia ), lack of desire to form relationships ( asociality ), and lack of motivation ( avolition ).

They investigated speech under trance.

They are usually single-word nouns, since nouns are the most concrete part of speech.

" They are typically able to comprehend words, and sentences with a simple syntactic structure ( see above ), but are more or less unable to generate fluent speech.

They spoke their own speech, which is near to Old Prussian language.

They are also frequently employed to aid those with severe speech impairment usually through a dedicated voice output communication aid.

They compare the network communication restrictions with restrictions that some phone companies tried to place on their lines in the past, preventing transferring of computer data rather than speech.

They draw three conclusions from Austin: ( 1 ) A performative utterance does not communicate information about an act second-hand — it is the act ; ( 2 ) Every aspect of language (" semantics, syntactics, or even phonematics ") functionally interacts with pragmatics ; ( 3 ) There is no distinction between language and speech.

They are used to break down a natural language sentence into its constituent parts ( also known as syntactic categories ) namely phrasal categories and lexical categories ( aka parts of speech ).

They favored contemporary subjects over historical ones, and sought to deemphasize the personal voice of the author in comparison to the often highly colored speech of the characters.