They recognized that slavery was a moral issue and not merely an economic interest, and that to recognize it explicitly in their Constitution would be in explosive contradiction to the concept of sovereignty they had set forth in the Declaration of 1776 that `` all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among them are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.

They also urged him to recognize the Japanese genocide against the Ainu people, but Putin declined.

They can recognize unusual situations and adjust accordingly.

They were gradually joined by delegates of the other estates ; Louis XVI started to recognize their validity on 27 June.

They held their own referendum a week earlier on 12 May 1991 in the territories they controlled and voted to remain in Yugoslavia which the Croatian government did not recognize as valid.

They must recognize the existence of a younger generation of teachers who were born during the Digital Age and are very comfortable with technology.

They recognize situations because they have meaning.

They believe that the student must learn to recognize such disagreements, which often reflect current debates.

They did, however, recognize the value of social obligation, and that pleasure could be gained from altruism.

They will also be wearing a patch that has homeplate, and the number 8 in the middle of it to recognize the recent death of Hall of Fame catcher, Gary Carter.

They recognize and cleave DNA at the same site, and they do not use ATP or AdoMet for their activity — they usually require only Mg < sup > 2 +</ sup > as a cofactor.

They must recognize events as they occur and must recognize when they have won and announce their winning.

They are arguing about a man's ability to recognize when a woman is faking an orgasm.

They claim he's an acquaintance but in fact hardly know him, admitting that they would not recognize him when they do see him.

They must recognize that in both the viewing of news and in the distributing of news, you have to be knowledgeable in the topic.

They recognize Magnus Maximus as Augustus.

They recognize a familiar word-shape without conscious thought of the individual letters.

They do not recognize divine authorship or inspiration in any other book in the Jewish Tanakh.

"... They say that their traditions say that the people we call the Croatan Indians ( though they do not recognize that name as that of a tribe, but only a village, and that they were Tuscaroras ), were always friendly to the whites ; and finding them destitute and despairing of ever receiving aid from England, persuaded them to leave Island, and go to the mainland ...

They recognize the danger Coraline is in after reading her fortune through tea leaves and give her a stone with a hole in it to help protect her.

They were also found to be inherently flawed due to their inability to recognize or feel emotions.

They also distinguish instruments on the basis of origin because of sociohistorical contacts, and recognize 3 categories: Mindangkabau ( Minangkabau asli ), Arabic ( asal Arab ), and Western ( asal Barat ), each of these divided up according to the 5 categories.

They may also recognize dissociative groups with which they would not wish to associate, and thus they behave adversely concerning that group's behaviors.

They therefore reject the state, seeing it as an aggressive entity which steals property ( through taxation and expropriation ), initiate aggression, are a compulsory monopoly on the use of force, use their coercive powers to benefit some businesses and individuals at the expense of others, create monopolies, restrict trade, and restrict personal freedoms via drug laws, compulsory education, conscription, laws on food and morality, and the like.

They are social animals, living in groups of between five and forty individuals, with the smaller species typically forming larger groups.

They thought that individuals should be free to pursue their self-interest without control or restraint by society.

They have taken responsibility for the nurture and support of those individuals seeking to discern God ’ s call to service as ordained or licensed ministers.

They proposed – among others – that in a fully competitive economic environment ( as they thought was the case of ecosystems ) the most potent individuals would thrive and in turn society would prosper ( in analogy to the observed biodiversity and abundance of life on earth ).

They live in small social groups ( approximately six individuals ) that stay within a few feet of one another most of the time, staying in contact via high-pitched calls.

They are also known to form polyspecific groups with tamarins, perhaps because Goeldi's Marmosets are not known to have the X-linked polymorphism which enables some individuals of other New World Monkey species to see in full tri-chromatic vision.

They assert that by defining crimes as being committed by one group against another, rather than as being committed by individuals against their society, the labeling of crimes as “ hate crimes ” causes groups to feel persecuted by one another, and that this impression of persecution can incite a backlash and thus lead to an actual increase in crime.

They rejected organizing, believing that only unorganized individuals were safe from coercion and domination, believing this kept them true to the ideals of anarchism.

They are considered " common " ( 0. 20 – 0. 40 individuals per 100 km² ) in the eastern Pacific along the coasts of British Columbia, Washington and Oregon, in the North Atlantic Ocean around Iceland and the Faroe Islands.

They argue that an individual sacrificing themselves for the " greater good " or being ruled by the " community " or " society " is not possible because society is composed of individuals rather than being a cohesive unit separate from the individual, and argue that collective control over the individual is tyrannical and un-anarchistic.

They propose that this economic system be executed in a manner that attempts to maximize the liberty of individuals and minimize concentration of power or authority ( libertarianism ).

They are generally sociable animals, living in groups of up to thirty individuals in some species.

They allow service-minded individuals the opportunity to build better communities at the high school and college or university level.

They conduct a randomized control trial just prior to the November 2005 gubernatorial election in Virginia and randomly assign individuals in Northern Virginia to ( a ) a treatment group that receives a free subscription to the Washington Post, ( b ) a treatment group that receives a free subscription to the Washington Times, or ( c ) a control group.

They focused mainly on microeconomics and local exchanges between individuals.

They improve the efficiency of composers who lack strong pianistic abilities, and allow untrained individuals the opportunity to create polished arrangements.

They are trained to provide safe, evidence-based dietary advice and management to individuals ( in health and disease ), as well as to institutions.

They may focus their practice on certain disease categories, types of patients, or methods of treatment – known as specialist medical practitioners – or assume responsibility for the provision of continuing and comprehensive medical care to individuals, families, and communities – known as general practitioners.

They do this by promoting good practice, ruling on eligible complaints, giving information to individuals and organisations, and taking action when the law is broken.

They concluded the ability to assign an individual to a specific population cluster with enough markers considered is perfectly compatible with the fact it may still be possible for two randomly chosen individuals from different populations / clusters to be more similar to each other than to a randomly chosen member of their own cluster whilst still being capable of being traced back to specific regions.

They may also be worn by individuals with diabetes or people with unequal leg length.

They affect the way sharia is interpreted by individuals in their personal lives, and the extent to which sharia is implemented in the public sphere by the state.

They concluded that the states are not insulated from suits by individuals by either the Eleventh Amendment in particular or the Constitution in general.