[permalink] [id link]
We can prove in a similar manner that the Kelvin statement implies the Clausius statement, and hence the two are equivalent.
from
Wikipedia
Some Related Sentences
We and can
He swung round to the other men -- `` We can catch him easy!!
We can soon tell ''.
`` We can get it if we dig '', he said patiently.
`` We can boil it '', he said.
We have staved off a war and, since our behavior has involved all these elements, we can only keep adding to our ritual without daring to abandon any part of it, since we have not the slightest notion which parts are effective.
We assume for this illustration that the size of the land plots is so great that the distance between dwellings is greater than the voice can carry and that most of the communication is between nearest neighbors only, as shown in Figure 2.
We hear equally fervent concern over the belief that we have not enough generalists who can see the over-all picture and combine our national skills and knowledge for useful purposes.
We can also argue that the three brothers Karamazov and Smerdyakov were the external representatives of an internal conflict within one man, Dostoevsky, a conflict having to do with father-murder and the wish to possess the father's woman.
We feel uncomfortable at being bossed by a corporation or a union or a television set, but until we have some knowledge about these phenomena and what they are doing to us, we can hardly learn to control them.
We must avoid the notion, suggested to some people by examples such as those just mentioned, that ideas are `` units '' in some way comparable to coins or counters that can be passed intact from one group of people to another or even, for that matter, from one individual to another.
We can conceive of no alternatives.
We can be virtuous only if we control our lower natures, the passions in this case, and strengthen our rational side ; ;
We must, first of all, be willing to forgive others before we can secure God's forgiveness.
We don't think she can make her child defective, emotionally disturbed or autistic.
We can attack Tshombe, but not Gigenza.
We can force Britain and France out of the Suez, but we cannot so much as try to force the Russian tanks back from Budapest.
We can mass our fleet against the Trujillos, but not against the Castros.
We can vote in the UN against South African apartheid or Portuguese rule in Angola, but we cannot even introduce a motion on the Berlin Wall -- much less, give the simple order to push the Wall down.
We can expect more of the same.
We can help in the planning process
We can no longer rely on interdepartmental machinery `` somewhere upstairs '' to resolve differences between this and other departments.
We must determine whether missiles can win a war all by themselves.
We have developed an ingenious method of interlocking these so that you can make the major part of your house in your own workshop, panel by panel, according to plan.
We gently usher them to an island of tables and chairs strategically placed on the far side of the pool where they can amuse each other until we get ready to merge sides.
We found that three men -- two carpenters and a helper -- can put up wall panels or trusses more economically than four men -- because four men don't make two teams ; ;
We and prove
We shall prove that Af.
We can now prove several lemmas.
We approach the proof of Theorem 2 by successively restricting the class of all formulas φ for which we need to prove " φ is either refutable or satisfiable ".
We seek to prove that there exist two irrational numbers and such that
Say instead we wish to prove proposition p. We can proceed by assuming " not p " ( i. e. that p is false ), and show that it leads to a logical contradiction.
We prove the inequality
We prove that there exists ( x, y, z ) such that
We should prove that the angular velocity previously defined is independent from the choice of origin, which means that the angular velocity is an intrinsic property of the spinning rigid body.
We will prove these things below ; let us first see an example of this proof in action.
We can prove the cancellation law easily using Euclid's lemma, which generally states that if an integer b divides a product rs ( where r and s are integers ), and b is relatively prime to r, then b must divide s. Indeed, the equation
In 1950, Time quoted Webb: " We don ’ t even try to prove that crime doesn ’ t pay ... sometimes it does " ( Dunning, 210 )
We shall prove the five lemma by individually proving each of the 2 four lemmas.
We prove that if an increasing sequence is bounded above, then it is convergent and the limit is.
We wish to prove that they are all the same color.
We cannot use Russia's methods, as they only and at best prove that the economy of an agrarian nation can be leveled to the ground ; Russia's thoughts are not our thoughts.
Jim Capaldi used this hiatus to record a solo album, Oh How We Danced, which would prove to be the beginning of a long and successful solo career.
We shall therefore now consider only arguments that prove the theorem directly for any matrix using algebraic manipulations only ; these also have the benefit of working for matrices with entries in any commutative ring.
We prove that this is not true.
We need to prove that some time class TIME ( g ( n )) is strictly larger than some time class TIME ( f ( n )).
We prove that R ( r, s ) exists by finding an explicit bound for it.
We now prove the result for the general case of c colours.
We have given to us a conception A uniting among its constituent marks two that prove to be contradictory, say M and N ; and we can neither deny the unity nor reject one of the contradictory members.
We wish to prove 4T < sup > 2 </ sup >
We do not intend to prove otherwise.
0.456 seconds.