Help


[permalink] [id link]
+
Page "Euler–Maclaurin formula" ¶ 57
from Wikipedia
Edit
Promote Demote Fragment Fix

Some Related Sentences

We and define
We first define a function b{t} as follows: given the set of squares such that each has three corners on C and vertex at t, b{t} is the corresponding set of positive parametric differences between T and the backward corner points.
We define these values as Af, and define g{t} in the same way for each T.
Articles of faith are sets of beliefs usually found in creeds, sometimes numbered, and often beginning with " We believe ...", which attempt to more or less define the fundamental theology of a given religion, and especially in the Christian Church.
We then define f ( x, y ) to be this z.
We can then define the differential map d: C < sup >∞</ sup >( M ) → T < sub > x </ sub >< sup >*</ sup > M at a point x as the map which sends f to df < sub > x </ sub >.
We can now define the value
We should not define ' wisdom ' as the absence of folly, or a healthy thing as whatever is not sick.
We cannot define a point except as ' something with no parts ', nor blindness except as ' the absence of sight in a creature that is normally sighted '.
We then define a contravariant functor F from C to D as a mapping that
We need a " mark " to define where we are and which direction we are heading to see if we ever get back to exactly the same pixel.
Verner wrote, " We can conclude that although the ancient Egyptians could not precisely define the value of π, in practice they used it ".
We define the kernel of h to be the set of elements in G which are mapped to the identity in H
We define the degree of to be the number of universal quantifier blocks, separated by existential quantifier blocks as shown above, in the prefix of.
We define the inverse limit of the inverse system (( A < sub > i </ sub >)< sub > i ∈ I </ sub >, ( f < sub > ij </ sub >)< sub > i ≤ j ∈ I </ sub >) as a particular subgroup of the direct product of the A < sub > i </ sub >' s:
We wish to maximize total value subject to the constraint that total weight is less than or equal to W. Then for each w ≤ W, define m to be the maximum value that can be attained with total weight less than or equal to w. m then is the solution to the problem.
We could also define a Lie algebra structure on T < sub > e </ sub > using right invariant vector fields instead of left invariant vector fields.
* We then define truth-functional operators, beginning with negation.
We can define addition, subtraction, and multiplication on by the following rules:
We can define methods to manipulate these new complex types.
We assume that A is an m-by-n matrix over either the real numbers or the complex numbers, and we define the linear map f by f ( x ) = Ax as above.
We can define a multiplication on the set S using the Steiner triple system by setting aa
We may define a possibly different topology on X using the continuous ( or topological ) dual space X < sup >*</ sup >.
We can also define it as a second component of business which includes all activities, functions and institutions involved in transferring goods from producers to consumer.

We and periodic
We can show a waveform is periodic by finding some period T for which the following equation is true:
z / OS customers that install periodic RSUs sometimes include the RSU information in their release description — for example, " We are running z / OS Version 1 Release 10 with RSU0909 ...."
We say that the number x is a periodic point of period m if f < sup > m </ sup >( x ) = x ( where f < sup > m </ sup > denotes the composition of m copies of f ) and having least period m if furthermore f < sup > k </ sup >( x ) ≠ x for all 0 < k < m. We are interested in the possible periods of periodic points of f. Consider the following ordering of the positive integers:
: d = 1: We should consider periodic boundary conditions given by closed loops in a compact symplectic manifold.
We state Dirichlet's theorem assuming f is a periodic function of period 2π with Fourier series expansion where
Moseley inquired if Bohr thought that the electromagnetic emission spectra of cobalt and nickel would follow their ordering by weight, or by their periodic table position ( atomic number, Z ), and Bohr said it would certainly be by Z. Moseley's reply was " We shall see!

We and functions
We now know that the above equation is true modulo integer multiples of, but Cotes missed the fact that a complex logarithm can have infinitely many values due to the periodicity of the trigonometric functions.
The EPR paper says: " We are thus forced to conclude that the quantum-mechanical description of physical reality given by wave functions is not complete.
We are interested in the following set of continuous functions called loops with base point x < sub > 0 </ sub >.
This change from a quasi-intensional stance to a fully extensional stance also restricts predicate logic to the second order, i. e. functions of functions: " We can decide that mathematics is to confine itself to functions of functions which obey the above assumption " ( PM 2nd Edition p. 401, Appendix C ).
We are thus forced to conclude that the quantum-mechanical description of physical reality given by wave functions is not complete.
We identify each property that a computable function may have with the subset of consisting of the functions with that property.
In certain circumstances, even words with primarily grammatical functions can be used as verbs or nouns, as in " We must look to the how's and not just the why's " or " Miranda was to-ing and fro-ing and not paying attention ".
We start by defining the input temperature states using " membership functions ":
We have defined an extension map from the space of bounded scalar valued sequences to the space of continuous functions over.
# We know from calculus the sum of continuous functions is continuous.
We say that these functions are orthogonal iff that inner product is zero:
Protesting " a pall of repression " and referring specifically to the USA PATRIOT Act as emblematic of that repression, it accuses the executive branch of usurping " the roles and functions of the other branches of government ," and continues, " We must take the highest officers of the land seriously when they talk of a war that will last a generation and when they speak of a new domestic order.
We shall make the transformation y < sub > i </ sub > = u < sub > i </ sub >( x < sub > 1 </ sub >, x < sub > 2 </ sub >, ..., x < sub > n </ sub >), for i = 1, ..., n, having inverse functions x < sub > i </ sub > = w < sub > i </ sub >( y < sub > 1 </ sub >, y < sub > 2 </ sub >, ..., y < sub > n </ sub >), for i = 1, ..., n, and Jacobian.
Abstractly, we can say that D is a linear transformation from some vector space V to another one, W. We know that D ( c ) = 0 for any constant function c. We can by general theory ( mean value theorem ) identify the subspace C of V, consisting of all constant functions as the whole kernel of D. Then by linear algebra we can establish that D < sup >− 1 </ sup > is a well-defined linear transformation that is bijective on Im D and takes values in V / C.
We note here that if the trajectories of the vertices are assumed to be linear polynomials in then the final sixty functions are in fact cubic polynomials, and in this exceptional case, it is possible to locate the exact collision time using the formula for the roots of the cubic.
We may recover the original inequality ( for the case p = 2 ) by using the functions | f | and | g | in place of f and g.
We may also define functions on discontinuous stochastic processes.
Here her ' cataloguing of regression, repression, reaction formation, isolation, undoing, projection, introjection, turning against the self, reversal and sublimation ' helped establish the importance of the ego functions and the concept of defense mechanisms, continuing the greater emphasis on the ego of her father — ' We should like to learn more about the ego ' — during his final decades.
We define a sheaf Γ ( Y / X ) on X by setting Γ ( Y / X )( U ) equal to the sections U → Y, that is, Γ ( Y / X )( U ) is the set of all functions s: U → Y such that fs = id < sub > U </ sub >.

1.093 seconds.