Help


[permalink] [id link]
+
Page "Emmanuel Joseph Sieyès" ¶ 7
from Wikipedia
Edit
Promote Demote Fragment Fix

Some Related Sentences

:" and What
:" What a joy he is!
:" Was mein Gott will " ( What My God Wills ), D major
:" What the Devil is all this ," said Radcliffe, " your colonel doesn't live here?
:" What if God, choosing to show his wrath and make his power known, bore with great patience the objects of his wrath — prepared for destruction?
:" What a cleaned-up version of Sraffa ( 1926 ) establishes is how nearly empty are all of Marshall's partial equilibrium boxes.
:" What, never?
:" What, never?
:" Moses said to God, ' Suppose I go to the Israelites and say to them, " The God of your fathers has sent me to you ," and they ask me, ‘ What is his name ?’ Then what shall I tell them ?” God said to Moses, “ I AM WHO I AM " — Exodus 3: 13-14 ( New International Version ) ( see Tetragrammaton ).
:" What flies there?
:" What flies there?
:" What Baker's transition team was told by Donald Regan's staff that weekend shocked them.
The Italian historian Polydore Vergil said that some of the English royal council objected to the match, saying that it would bring the Stewarts directly into the line of English succession, to which the wily and astute Henry replied :" What then?
:" What we may be witnessing is not just the end of the Cold War, or the passing of a particular period of post-war history, but the end of history as such: that is, the end point of mankind's ideological evolution and the universalization of Western liberal democracy as the final form of human government.
:" What greater conceit and what greater heartlessness, can there be than to give a ' reason ' for the death and torture of millions of innocent men, women and children?
:" What do " mad cows ", people with neurodegenerative diseases, and an unusual type of inheritance in yeast have in common?
:" What day did she pass without a large task of private devotion?
:" What " truth " or objectivity can be ascribed to this theoretic construction of the world, which presses far beyond the given, is a profound philosophical problem.
:" What is here required is not a bodily action, but an inward disposition.
:" What, then, is the meaning of restoration through indemnity?
The range of differentiation goes only as far as the " All :" The Blessed One said, ' What is the All?
:" What they objected to was arbitrary obstacles, artificial limitations upon the freedom of each member of this frontier folk to work out his own career without fear or favor.
In Arabic it means :" What is taken from the Dhimmis, which is the amount of money agreed upon in the contract that gives the none-Muslim the Dhimmai status ; and it's derived from the act of the verb " reward "; as if it ( Jizya ) is a requital for not being killed.
:" What are they doing to you?
:" What shall I do to be for ever known,

:" and is
:" A choice function exists in constructive mathematics, because a choice is implied by the very meaning of existence.
:" To this day Harold is not quite sure what made him suddenly pour out the whole story to a little man to whom he had only spoken a few minutes before.
:" It is this villainous sea that troubles me!
:" It is the misfortune of small, precise men always to hanker after large and flamboyant women.
:" The proudest possession of Lord Darnley is an earthenware urn containing the ashes which were presented to him by Melbourne residents when he captained the Englishmen in 1882.
:" His name is Ananda, great king.
:" It is sensible to avoid drinking alcohol when taking medication.
:" There is naught on earth to compare with the future life.
Norman Steenrod characterized Lefschetz ' impact as editor as follows :" The importance to American mathematicians of a first-class journal is that it sets high standards for them to aim at.
:" The first part of our arithmetic organ ... should be a parallel storage organ which can receive a number and add it to the one already in it, which is also able to clear its contents and which can store what it contains.
Aristotle knew of this tradition when he began his Metaphysics, and had already drawn his own conclusion, which he presented under the guise of asking what being is :" And indeed the question which was raised of old is raised now and always, and is always the subject of doubt, viz., what being is, is just the question, what is substance?
Hobbes said :" The Latines called Accounts of mony Rationes ... and thence it seems to proceed that they extended the word Ratio, to the faculty of Reckoning in all other things .... When a man reasoneth hee does nothing else but conceive a summe totall ... For Reason ... is nothing but Reckoning ... of the consequences of generall names agreed upon, for the marking and signifying of our thoughts ...."
Where being, the noun, is readily accessible to experience and classifiable, being, the participle, is not :" In short ... philosophy may perhaps be able to tell us everything about that which reality is, but nothing at all concerning this not unimportant detail: the actual existence, or non-existence, of what we call reality ....
:" Then there is also in that place the abode called Breidablik, and there is not in heaven a fairer dwelling.
:" He dwells in the place called Breidablik, which is in heaven ; in that place may nothing unclean be, even as is said here:

:" and Third
:" The rulers of the Third Reich wanted to crush the entire Jewish people, to cancel it from the register of the peoples of the earth.
:" Willing cooperation with the slave labor utilization of the Third Reich was a matter of corporate policy that permeated the whole Farben organization ... For this reason, criminal responsibility goes beyond the actual immediate participants at Auschwitz.
The Israeli historian Omer Bartov wrote in 2003 about Mommsen ’ s functionalist understanding of the Third Reich that :" In this reading, ideology is recognized and then dismissed as irrelevant ; the suffering of the victims is readily acknowledged and then omitted as having nothing to tell us about the mechanics of genocide ; and individual perpetrators from Adolf Hitler, Heinrich Himmler and Reinhard Heyrdrich to the lowliest SS man are shoved out of the historical picture as contemptible, but ultimately unimportant pawns in the larger scheme of a “ polycratic state ” whose predilection for “ cumulative radicalization ” was a function of its structure rather the product of intentional planning or self-proclaimed will ”
In another essay entitled " Reappraisal and Repression The Third Reich In West German Historical Consciousness ", Mommsen wrote :" Nolte's superficial approach which associates things that do not belong together, substitutes analogies for casual arguments, and-thanks to his taste for exaggeration-produces a long outdated interpretation of the Third Reich as the result of a single factor.
Writing in 1979, Hildebrand stated :" Fundamental to National Socialist genocide was Hitler's race dogma ... Hitler's programmatic ideas about the destruction of the Jews and racial domination have still to be rated as primary and causative, as motive and aim, as intention and goal of the " Jewish policy " of the Third Reich ".
In a 1986 review of Nolte's 1985 essay " Between Myth and Revisionism " in the Historische Zeitschrift journal, Hildebrand argued that Nolte had in a praiseworthy way sought :" to incorporate in historicizing fashion that central element for the history of National Socialism and of the " Third Reich " of the annihilatory capacity of the ideology and of the regime, and to comprehend this totalitarian reality in the interrelated context of Russian and German history ".
The American historian Gavriel D. Rosenfeld wrote about Broszat's call for " historization " that :" In the 1980s, the German historian Martin Broszat famously argued that overtly moral analyses of the Third Reich suffered from their embrace of a " black-and-white " perspective that drew too rigid a dichotomy between perpetrators and victims, obscured the era's gray complexity, bracketed off the Third Reich from " normal " modes of historical analysis ( such as an empathetic perspective towards the historical actors themselves ) and prevented it from being integrated into the large sweep of German history ... At the same time, an overly moralistic view runs the risk of mythologizing history and transforming it into a collection of moral ethical lessons that, over time, can easily become stale and cease to resonate within society at large.

1.785 seconds.