Page "Argument from inconsistent revelations" Paragraph 1

The argument from inconsistent revelations, also known as the avoiding the wrong hell problem, is an argument against the existence of God.

It asserts that it is unlikely that God exists because many theologians and faithful adherents have produced conflicting and mutually exclusive revelations.

The argument states that since a person not privy to revelation must either accept it or reject it based solely upon the authority of its proponent, and there is no way for a mere mortal to resolve these conflicting claims by investigation, it is prudent to reserve one's judgment.