Help


from Wikipedia
« »  
Instead of seeing it as a fair system under which ' everyone ' has equal rights, they saw it as the numerically preponderant poor tyrannizing over the rich.
They viewed society like a modern stock company: democracy is like a company where all shareholders have an equal say regardless of the scale of their holding ; one share or ten thousand, it makes no difference.
They regarded this as manifestly unjust.
In Aristotle this is categorized as the difference between ' arithmetic ' and ' geometric ' ( i. e. proportional ) equality.
Democracy was far from being the normal style of governance and the beliefs on which it was based were in effect a minority opinion.
Those writing in later centuries generally had no direct experience of democracy themselves.

2.002 seconds.