Page "Charles Evans Hughes" Paragraph 20
from
Wikipedia
The respective authority of federal and state governments under the Constitution's commerce clause had long been in dispute.
In Cooley v. Board of Wardens ( 1852 ) the Court headed by Roger B. Taney had allowed the states, in the absence of federal legislation, to control those aspects of commerce that did not require a single national policy.
However, more recent decisions, such as Weldon v. Missouri ( 1875 ), had curtailed the power of the states to tax or license out-of-state products or sales agents.
Influenced perhaps by his experience as a state governor, Hughes authored a series of decisions that upheld state laws that affected — and, it might be argued, infringed on — congressional authority over interstate commerce.
For example, invoking police power arguments, he upheld a Georgia statute requiring electric headlights on locomotives, including those engaged in interstate commerce.
Page 1 of 1.
1.914 seconds.