The summary judgment ruling was upheld by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, but was unanimously reversed by the US Supreme Court in a decision titled MGM Studios, Inc. v. Grokster, Ltd.

In its judgment summary the Appeals Court said, " The trial court acted without jurisdiction in entering an injunction against the Election Commission.

On August 24, 2009, the U. S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit reversed the portion of the August 10, 2007 district court summary judgment in SCO v. Novell, that Novell owned the copyright to Unix.

On August 24, 2009, the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals issued its findings on the appeal of the 2007 summary judgment.

In upholding summary judgment for American Airlines on punitive damages the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit explained:

Upon remand from the Supreme Court, the Court of Appeals affirmed Benitez ' conviction and sentencing in a per curiam, summary opinion.

On August 24, 2009, the U. S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit partially reversed Kimball's August 10, 2007 summary judgement, insofar as Kimball had found that Novell owned the copyright to Unix.

Chamberlain appealed the District Court's decision of summary judgment granted to Skylink in Chamberlain II and the case was heard before the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.

v. Sheng-Yen Lu, the Superior Court of King County granted the Temple's motion for summary judgment, and the Court of Appeals later " affirm the trial court's grant of summary judgment dismissing all claims against the Temple.

On August 24, 2009, the U. S. 10th Circuit Court of Appeals reversed the 2007 summary judgment of the U. S. District Court for the District of Utah, which found that Novell was the owner of Unix and UnixWare copyrights.

The plaintiffs sought review in the District Court, which granted summary judgment for the FEC ; this ruling was affirmed by a panel of the Court of Appeals, but the Court of Appeals en banc reversed.

In 2005, the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit ordered summary judgment against Gibson in that action, on the grounds that there was no evidence to support a finding of likelihood of confusion.

Decline to Acknowledge 2 / 6 / 1996 ( 61 FR 4476 ); request for reconsideration to IBIA ; decision affirmed 7 / 18 / 1997 ; reconsidered Final Determination 1 / 7 / 1998 ( 63 FR 888 ); in litigation ; 12 / 11 / 2001, U. S. Court of Appeals affirmed the District Court ’ s Memorandum Opinion & Order granting summary judgment to the Department ; US Supreme Court denied cert.

On September 13, 2011, the 9th Circuit U. S. Court of Appeals overturned the summary judgment and ruled that the school district did not violate Johnson ’ s free speech rights.

In February 1991, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit upheld Bakker's conviction on the fraud and conspiracy charges, but voided Bakker's 45-year sentence, as well as the $ 500, 000 fine, and ordered that a new sentencing hearing be held.

In 2008, a three-judge panel of the U. S. Third Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the murder conviction but ordered a new capital sentencing hearing because the jury was improperly instructed.

Any conviction in a criminal case can be taken to a court of Appeals for judicial review.

On February 25, 2011, public defender James Klein filed an appeal of Guandique's conviction with the District of Columbia Court of Appeals.

On 28 November 2007, the Appeals Chamber partially allowed appeals against conviction from all three men, reducing their sentences to 30 years ' imprisonment for Nahimana, 32 years ' imprisonment for Barayagwiza and 35 years ' imprisonment for Ngeze.

However, in November 1960, Castellano's conviction was reversed by an Appeals Court.

New York's highest court, the Court of Appeals, overturned the conviction on a 4 – 3 vote in December 1940.

The Court of Appeals upheld the second conviction on January 8, 1942.

However, on December 10, 1941, the conviction was overturned on a 4 – 3 vote by New York's Court of Appeals, which questioned the use of testimony of non-accomplice witnesses who were promised leniency to support the testimony of Reles, Tannenbaum and Magoon.

The conviction was overturned again by the Court of Appeals on a 4 – 3 vote, but, this time, the court also dismissed the indictment as faulty since the only testimony presented to the Grand Jury was from accomplices without corroboration.

The conviction was affirmed by the California Court of Appeals.

On January 16, 2007, a divided panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in Seattle reversed Ressam's conviction on one of the charges, due to the majority's reading of the applicable law.

On July 3, 2008, the Appeals Chamber of the ICTY reversed the Trial Chamber's conviction and acquitted Orić of all charges brought against him.

The Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the conviction, and the Supreme Court granted certiorari.

The episode ends with a screen noting that " In May 2003, despite forensics proving that the disputed finger print is not from the Routiers or investigators, the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals upheld Darlie Routier's conviction.

The conviction was reversed by the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals in April 2007, with one judge calling the U. S. Attorney's case " beyond thin ".

The New York Court of Appeals, on review of Buchalter's case, upheld his conviction and death sentence in October 1942 by a vote of 4-3.

On March 26, 2012, the U. S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed Jefferson's conviction and sentence on ten of the eleven counts on which he was convicted.

The Court of Appeals vacated and remanded the conviction on one count of the indictment, involving alleged wire fraud, holding that venue on that count was improper in the federal court in Virginia.

This decision was reversed, and the conviction was ultimately upheld by the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in July 2005.

The Court of Appeals has, however, reversed the conviction on the conspiracy to commit murder, since there is no evidence that Hernández knew the shootdown would occur in international airspace.

He appealed his conviction to the Fifth Court of Appeals of Texas, but he lost this appeal.

If either the government or the accused is unsatisfied with the results of this appeal, the conviction or the sentence can be appealed to the Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces ( CAAF ).

As a result of publicity around the film, Adams ( whose death sentence had been overturned by the U. S. Supreme Court in 1980 and commuted to life in prison ) had his conviction overturned by the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals ; the case was returned to Dallas County for a retrial.

In Northern Ireland the Criminal Justice Act 2003, effective 18 April 2005, makes certain " qualifying offence " ( including murder, rape, kidnapping, specified sexual acts with young children, specified drug offences, defined acts of terrorism, as well as in certain cases attempts or conspiracies to commit the foregoing ) subject to retrial after acquittal ( including acquittals obtained before passage of the Act ) if there is a finding by the Court of Appeals that there is " new and compelling evidence.

* Appeals always go to the Provincial Court of Appeal first, and then on to the Supreme Court of Canada.

Appeals from the Federal Magistrates Court must go to either of these courts ( Federal Court or Family Court ), dependent on the area of law.

The state is served by the U. S. District Court for the District of Maryland ( with two divisions, sitting in Baltimore and Greenbelt ) and federal appeals from the state go to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit in Richmond, Virginia.

The 6th Circuit Court of Appeals issued an order allowing the execution to go forward.

It primarily hears appeals from the trial-level city and county Circuit Courts, as well as the criminal law, family law and administrative law cases that go through the Court of Appeals of Virginia.

Appeals from J & DR court go to Circuit Court.

Appeals from the GDC for civil matters in excess of $ 50, and for all criminal and traffic cases, go to the Circuit Court, where they are re-tried de novo ( because the GDC does not generate a record to be reviewed for error ).

Appeals from the Court of Appeals go to the Supreme Court of Virginia.

Criminal appeals involving a sentence of death, life imprisonment or imprisonment of twenty years or more go directly to the Kentucky Supreme Court, bypassing the Kentucky Court of Appeals.