:: Attached to 6131 Fighter 6131 Tactical Support Wing, 14 August-1 December 1950

:: Attached to: Fifth Air Force, 28 July-3 August 1950

:: Attached to: 6002 Fighter 6002 Tactical Support Wing, 4 August-30 November 1950

:: Attached to: Fifth Air Force, 1 December 1950-31 October 1954

:: Attached to Far East Air Forces, 6 – 13 October 1952

:: Attached to 39th Air Division, 13 October 1952-c. 13 February 1953

:: Attached to 58 Fighter-Bomber Wing, 16 – 31 March 1953

:: Attached to Fifth Air Force, 1 April-7 November 1953

:: Attached to Fifth Air Force, 25 September 1950-1 August 1954

:: Attached to Fifth Air Force, 10 July 1952-28 February 1955

:: Further Attached to Fifth Air Force, July 1951-10 July 1952

:: Further Attached to Fifth Air Force, 1951-1952

:: Further Attached to Fifth Air Force, August 1952-November 1954

:: Further Attached to Fifth Air Force, February 1952-June 1953

:: Attached to: Far East Air Forces Combat Cargo Command, Provisional, 1 – 25 January 1951

:: Attached to: 315th Air Division, 25 January-1 October 1951

:: Attached to: 315th Air Division, 1 October-5 November 1951

:: Attached to: 6122 Air Base Wing, 5 November 1951-26 March 1952

:: Attached to: 374th Troop Carrier Wing, 26 March-21 November 1952

:: Attached to: 1 Troop Carrier Task Force, 5 – 9 September 1950

:: Attached to: Far East Air Forces Combat Cargo Command, Provisional, 10 September 1950-1 December 1950

:: Attached to 315th Air Division, 14 April 1952-1 January 1953

:: Attached to FEAF Combat Cargo Command, Provisional, 8 November 1950-1 December 1950

:: Attached to 315th Air Division ( Combat Cargo ), 1 January 1953-30 June 1954

:: Air Defense Command ( Attached ), ( September 1950 – June 1965 )

:: TOP SECRET U

:: R. Buckminster Fuller ( 1895-1983 ), U. S. American philosopher and inventor, in Synergetics: Explorations in the Geometry of Thinking ( 1975 ), Pattern Integrity 505. 201

:: Example: The IDEA was enacted “ to ensure that all children with disabilities have available to them a free appropriate public education .” 20 U. S. C.

:: Example: Nevertheless, the due process clause protects " property " interests ; and while the notion of property interest has been stretched quite far in certain contexts, e. g., Goldberg v. Kelly, 397 U. S. 254 ( 1970 ), it depends importantly on what interests are recognized under state law.

:: Example: accord, Swierkiewicz, 534 U. S., at 514, 122 S. Ct.

:: Example: Before 1997, the IDEA was silent on the subject of private school reimbursement, but courts had granted such reimbursement as “ appropriate ” relief under principles of equity pursuant to 20 U. S. C.

:: Example: See also Martin v. Wilks, 490 U. S. 755, 784 n. 21, 104 L. Ed.

:: Example: The Supreme Court of Florida has said that the legislature intended the State's electors to " participate fully in the federal electoral process ," as provided in 3 U. S. C.

:: Example: The Court indirectly recognized as much when it stated in McMann v. Richardson, supra, 397 U. S., at 770, 771, 90 S. Ct., at 1448, 1449, that a guilty plea cannot be attacked as based on inadequate legal advice unless counsel was not “ a reasonably competent attorney ” and the advice was not “ within the range of competence demanded of attorneys in criminal cases .” See also Cuyler v. Sullivan, supra, 446 U. S., at 344, 100 S. Ct., at 1716.

:: Example: With the exception of Cuyler v. Sullivan, 446 U. S. 335, 100 S. Ct.

:: Example: See generally Grosjean v. American Press Co., 297 U. S. 233, 245-249, 56 S. Ct.

:: Example: Petitioners have raised an equal protection claim ( or, alternatively, a due process claim, see generally Logan v. Zimmerman Brush Co., 455 U. S. 422, 71 L. Ed.

:: Example: Compare Guaranty Trust Co. v. York, 326 U. S. 99, 105-107, 65 S. Ct.

:: Boos v. Barry, 485 U. S. 312, 318 ( 1988 ) ( recognizing public-issue signs to be classic examples of free speech ).

:: See generally Akhil Reed Amar, Reports of My Death Are Greatly Exaggerated: A Reply, 138 U. Pa. L. Rev.

:: See, e. g., Environmental Defense Fund, Inc. v. Hardin, 138 U. S. App. D. C.

:: U

:: For more information, see Relationship of American Jews to the U. S. Federal Government ( pre-20th century ).

:: Article I Section 8 of the U. S. Constitution

:: A = U – TS.

:: The smaller value of U < sub > 1 </ sub > and U < sub > 2 </ sub > is the one used when consulting significance tables.

:: Therefore U

:: U < sup > 1 </ sup >