Critics of the latter development charge that it has not increased the number of students from economically deprived backgrounds attending university.

Critics of Marx have leveled the charge of historicism against his theory since its very genesis.

Critics of the government charge that the government indicted Milken's brother Lowell in order to put pressure on Milken to settle, a tactic condemned as unethical by some legal scholars.

Critics charge that this would lead to a new generation of nuclear weapons and would increase pressures to test.

Critics charge that strict liability creates risk of moral hazard.

Critics charge that the requiring manufacturers to internalize costs they would otherwise externalize increases the price of goods.

Critics charge that " rogue state " merely means any state that is generally hostile to the U. S., or even one that opposes the U. S. without necessarily posing a wider threat.

Critics charge that such taxes blindly tax those who make legitimate and illegitimate usages of the products ; for instance, a person or corporation using CD-R's for data archival should not have to subsidize the producers of popular music.

Critics, such as gay shame, charge the parades with an undue emphasis on sex and fetish-related interests which they see as counter-productive to LGBT interests, and exposing the " gay community " to ridicule.

Critics pointed out that her apology came at a time when a group of New England Veterans had launched a campaign to disrupt a film project she was working on, leading to the charge that her apology was motivated at least partially by self-interest.

Critics charge that standardized tests became a mandatory curriculum placed into schools without public debate and without any accountability measures of its own.

Critics also charge that standardized tests encourage " teaching to the test " at the expense of creativity and in-depth coverage of subjects not on the test.

Critics charge that to achieve the defeat of Shining Path, the Peruvian military engaged in widespread human rights abuses, and that the majority of the victims were poor highland countryside inhabitants caught in the crossfire between the military and insurgents.

Critics charge that the Socratic Method has fallen into disuse, and little debate occurs in law school classrooms, which are mostly lectures.

" Critics of Juche charge that the " Juche dating system ", as it is based on a person's birth date rather than a political era, reflects a dynastic tradition where era names are specified for ruling Emperors of Japan and China, as well as the Korean Emperors, who also used this system.

Critics charge that rather than supporting a favorite team in any one game, some fantasy owners may instead support the players on their fantasy rosters.

Critics charge that the family ’ s political connections provide it with unfair advantages in business.

Critics charge this would lead to fewer doctors or dentists.

Critics have denounced this as gossip and amounting to sectarianism, a charge inverted by the CPGB.

Critics charge that Moltke gained the position on the strength of his name and his friendship with the Kaiser.

Critics charge that claims that this had happened are akin to claiming " the problem, in short, is not that the banks acted irresponsibly in creating financial instruments that blew up, or in making loans that could never be repaid.

Critics charge that the scandals are symbolic of deeper organizational biases and problems within NEA.

Critics of Sokal and Bricmont charge that they lack understanding of the writing they were criticizing.

Critics of the Advanced Placement Program charge that courses and exams focus on breadth of content coverage instead of depth.

Critics contend a modern example of this is the current executive of the U. S. In the view of critics like Paul Krugman the tax policies of the Bush administration vastly favored the wealthy over the poor and the middle class.

Critics of the term believe it incorrectly describes the 21st century and overstates the importance of the states around the Pacific Rim.

On January 6, 2012, NBC president Robert Greenblatt announced at the Television Critics Association winter press tour that Harry Connick, Jr. had been cast in a four-episode arc of NBC's long-running legal drama, Law & Order: Special Victims Unit as new Executive ADA, David Haden, a dedicated, straight-shooting prosecutor who is assigned a case with Detective Benson ( Mariska Hargitay ).

Critics may view the fictional characters as a psychological case study, attempting to identify such Freudian concepts as Oedipus complex, penis envy, Freudian slips, Id, ego and superego and so on, and demonstrate how they influenced the thoughts and behaviors of fictional characters.

Critics, however, interpreted the sentence as stating that the case did not set precedent in any way and could not be used to justify any future court decision, and some suggested that this was evidence the majority realized its holding was untenable.

Critics of polygamy in the early LDS Church have documented several cases where deception and coercion were used to induce marriage, for example citing the case of Joseph Smith who warned some potential spouses of eternal damnation if they did not consent to be his wife.

Critics have pointed out a disturbing correlation between Ferengi attributes ( love of profit that overrides communal decency ; the large, sexualized head feature, in this case ears ) and negative Jewish stereotypes.

Critics of this ruling found this to be a case of judicial nitpicking and that the Court had in essence allowed the previously-banned practice of concentrating a racial group into a single district.

Critics of the classical view of freedom of contract argue that this freedom is illusory when the bargaining power of the parties is highly unequal, most notably in the case of contracts between employers and workers.

Critics of bite mark comparison cite the case of Ray Krone, an Arizona man convicted of murder on bite mark evidence left on a woman's breast.

Critics, however, have suggested that if this is the case, they will pay more income tax anyway, and that this would be a fairer source of the money.

Critics of the Shah Bano case point out that while divorce is within the purview of personal laws, maintenance is not, and thus it is discriminatory to exclude Muslim women from a civil law.

Critics of substantive due process claim that the doctrine began, at the federal level, with the infamous 1857 slavery case of Dred Scott v. Sandford.

Critics argue that judges are making determinations of policy and morality that properly belong with legislators ( i. e. " legislating from the bench "), or argue that judges are reading views into the Constitution that are not really implied by the document, or argue that judges are claiming power to expand the liberty of some people at the expense of other people's liberty ( e. g., as in the Dred Scott case ), or argue that judges are addressing substance instead of process.

Critics have also labeled Porter's conclusions as lacking in empirical support and as justified with selective case studies.

Critics argued that the United Kingdom was obligated to make a strong prima facie case to US courts before extradition would be granted, and that, by contrast, extradition from the United Kingdom to the United States was a matter of administrative decision alone, without prima facie evidence.

Critics of substantive due process often claim that the doctrine began, at the federal level, with the infamous 1857 slavery case of Dred Scott v. Sandford.

Critics argue that judges are making determinations of policy and morality that properly belong with legislators ( i. e. " legislating from the bench "), or argue that judges are reading views into the Constitution that are not really implied by the document, or argue that judges are claiming power to expand the liberty of some people at the expense of other people's liberty ( e. g. as in the Dred Scott case ), or argue that judges are addressing substance instead of process.

Critics such as Galen Strawson reply that, in the case of consciousness, even a mistaken experience retains the essential face of experience that needs to be explained, contra Dennett.

Critics of the deflationary approach object that qualia are a case where a single reality cannot have multiple appearances.

Critics point to the case of Clever Hans, a horse who could apparently count, but who was actually understanding subtle cues from the questioner.

Critics point out that: ( 1 ) the workplace safety standards are based on allowable maximums in the workplace, not mercury body burden ; ( 2 ) the workplace safety numbers are not applicable to continuous 24hr exposure, they're limited to a normal work day and 40 hr work-week ; and ( 3 ) the uptake / absorption numbers are averages and not worst case patients ( those most at risk ).

Critics of Starr also contend that his investigation was highly politicized because it regularly leaked tidbits of information to the press, in violation of legal ethics, and because his report included lengthy descriptions which were humiliating yet irrelevant to the legal case.

Critics also cite the case of Charles Keating, who stole in excess of US $ 252 million in the Savings and Loan scandal of the 1980s, and who had donated $ 1. 25 million to Mother Teresa's cause.

Critics such as Benny Morris, David Wise and others have argued the book is essentially a novel and that a case officer would not have had access to so many operational secrets.

Critics of the federal government's involvement in the Terri Schiavo case, which culminated around the same time as the Sun Hudson case, pointed out that the Advance Directives Act was signed into law by George W. Bush, who was then Governor of Texas.