Kierkegaard says Hegel was wrong because he didn't protest against Abraham as the father of faith and call him a murderer.

The main point of the references to Hegel here is to criticize Heiberg and Martensen and not any particular doctrine in Hegel ’ s philosophy .” He says this becomes more clear when Fear and Trembling is compared to The Concept of Irony.

Hegel also says that the Science of Logic incorporates the material of the ' old ' metaphysics, which derives from Aristotle and Plato, but also embraces Leibniz, Spinoza, Wolff, etc.

“ It can therefore be said ,” says Hegel, “ that this content is the exposition of God as he is in his eternal essence before the creation of nature and a finite mind .” The German word Hegel employed to denote this post-dualist form of consciousness was Begriff ( traditionally translated either as Concept or Notion ).

At bottom of all these ideas, says Hegel, is an absolute opposition that is held to exist between the ego and its other, this latter taking the form, respectively, of art, nature and the non-ego in general.

The inexactitude of this method of procedure results, says Hegel, primarily from their failure to distinguish between Quantum as the Quantity that each individual term of a differential co-efficient represents, and the Qualitative nature of their relationship when in the form of a ratio.

It is in this form of the Ratio, says Hegel, that “ quantum has reached its Notion and has completely realized it .” In the Direct and Inverse Ratios, the relation between the constant and its variables was not continuous, the former only being a fixed proportionality between them, and the latter relating itself to them only negatively.

As soon as " A is ..." completes ( is predicated by something ), says Hegel, difference emerges.

Hegel says that things are different through unlikeness: this is the so-called " Law of Diversity.

Hegel says, for example, that ground is " that from which phenomena is understood.

As an example Hegel says that an official may hold an office for a variety of reasons — suitable connections, made an appearance on such and such occasion, and so forth.

Complete ground Hegel says is the " total ground-relation.

Adorno resumed his teaching duties at the university soon after his arrival, with seminars on " Kant ’ s Transcendental Dialectic ," aesthetics, Hegel, “ Contemporary Problems in the Theory of Knowledge ” and “ The Concept of Knowledge .” Adorno ’ s surprise at his students ' passionate interest in intellectual matters did not, however, blind him to continuing problems within Germany: The literary climate was dominated by writers who had remained in Germany during Hitler's rule, the government re-employed people who had been active in the Nazi apparatus and people were generally loath to own up to their own collaboration or the guilt they thus incurred.

Evoking Enlightenment thinkers like Voltaire, Adam Smith, Edward Gibbon and — especially — Hegel, in 1963 he made the now-famous remark that Africa had no history prior to European exploration and colonization, saying rather that “ there is only the history of Europeans in Africa.

In the response of Karl Marx to Hegel, those poles of idealism ( spiritual ignorance and self-understanding ) are replaced with categories of materialism, wherein, for Man, spiritual ignorance becomes “ alienation ” and self-understanding becomes the “ realisation of his species-being ”; thus, the transcendent end of history results in the human triumph over alienation, and the establishment of an objectively better society.

* “ Comment ” on Robert B. Brandom, “ Some Pragmatist Themes in Hegel ’ s Idealism ”, European Journal of Philosophy vii ( 1999 ), 190-3.

* “ L ’ idealismo di Hegel come radicalizzazione di Kant ”, in Iride 34 ( 2001 ), 527-48.

* “ L ’ idealismo di Hegel come radicalizazzione di Kant ”, in Luigi Ruggiu and Italo Testa, eds., Hegel Contemporaneo: la ricezione americana di Hegel a confronto con la traduzione europea ( Milan: Guerini, 2003 ).

* “ The apperceptive I and the empirical self: towards a heterodox reading of ‘ Lordship and Bondage ’ in Hegel ’ s Phenomenology ”, Bulletin of the Hegel Society of Great Britain 47 / 48, 2003, 1-16.

* “ Hegel and the Myth of the Given ”, in Wolfgang Welsch und Klaus Vieweg, Herausg., Das Interesse des Denkens: Hegel aus heutiger Sicht ( München: Wilhelm Fink Verlag, 2003 ), pp. 75 – 88.

A complete understanding of, for example, Lupasco ’ s analysis of those precursors that André Glucksmann has called “ Les Maîtres Penseurs ” – Kant, Hegel, Schopenhauer and Marx – must be sought in several different books.

On the other hand, according to Hegel ’ s theory of the tragic, tragedy is “ set in train by a peripatetic act that rebounds upon the agent as a conflict between ethical powers ” ( Finlayson 500 ).

The “ Absolute " Royce defended was quite different from the ideas of Hegel and Bradley.

the angst of the philosophers after Hegel: “ a Dasein beyond metaphysics, a

The task of extinguishing this opposition within consciousness Hegel believed he had already accomplished in his book Phänomenologie des Geistes ( 1807 ) with the final attainment of Absolute Knowing: “ Absolute knowing is the truth of every mode of consciousness because ... it is only in absolute knowing that the separation of the object from the certainty of itself is completely eliminated: truth is now equated with certainty and certainty with truth .” Once thus liberated from duality, the science of thinking no longer requires an object or a matter outside of itself to act as a touchstone for its truth, but rather takes the form of its own self-mediated exposition and development which eventually comprises within itself every possible mode of rational thinking.

When the student Feuerbach presented his own theory to professor Hegel, Hegel refused to reply positively to it.

When one looks for these terms in his writings, one finds so many occurrences that it may become clear that Hegel employed the Kantian using a different terminology.

When Hegel reaches essence, he starts a new " book ," still under the heading of objective logic.

" When referring to the east, Hegel generally has in mind the historical cultures of Persia, though at times he does reference China and spends a great deal of space discussing India and Indian religions.

When the student Feuerbach presented his own theory to professor Hegel, Hegel refused to reply positively to it.

( Translation of the paper I gave at the Venice Hegel conference in May 2001.

* I was very much surprised when Mill informed me that he had not read a line of Hegel, either in the original or in translation, and regarded the entire Hegelian philosophy as sterile and empty sophistry.

: Besides these I have been toiling through Stirling ’ s Secret of Hegel.

I say " too well " because I found by actual experience of Hegel that conversancy with him tends to deprave one ’ s intellect.

Contemplating the position of recent philosophy from Locke to Hegel, and having his eye directed to the ancient and fundamental problem of the origin, truth and certainty of our ideas, he wrote: " If philosophy is to be restored to love and respect, I think it will be necessary, in part, to return to the teachings of the ancients, and in part to give those teachings the benefit of modern methods " ( Theodicy, a.

Like that of the Lyubomudry group founded earlier in the century, the purpose of the circle was to discuss Western philosophy ( specifically Hegel ) and literature which was officially banned by the Imperial government of Nicholas I.

Imagine Rousseau, Voltaire, Holbach, Lessing, Heine and Hegel combined into one person — and I say combined, not blended — and there you have Dr.

I thought that whatever Hegel had denied must be true.

He reflects on Descartes ’ philosophy of “ I think, therefore I am ,” while referencing Kant, Hegel, Husserl, Heidegger, Aristotle, and Plato when defining the history of European thought.

This book is in three main parts: ( I ) It deals first with the history of certain key ideas from the early modern period ( assessing thinkers from Hobbes and Marx to Hegel, Weber and Kuhn, ( II ) before exploring the institutional and social features which have shaped the emergence of modern social science ,( III ) concluding by suggesting an alternative realist philosophy for the future.

Deleuze suggests that, unlike Hegel, he creates concepts out of a joyful and creative logic that resists the dualism of dialectic: " I make, remake and unmake my concepts along a moving horizon, from an always decentered centre, from an always displaced periphery which repeats and differenciates them " ( xxi ).