Historians today generally dismiss the authenticity of the find, attributing it to a publicity stunt performed to raise funds to repair the Abbey, which was mostly burned in 1184.

These primitive Australoid tribes, once were pre-historic inhabitants of Goa and Konkan. Nothing more is known about the. Modern communities like Gaudes, Kunbis, Mahars of Konkan today are supposed to be the modern representatives of Proto-Australoids. Originally hunter-gatherers later developed a primitive form of agriculture. Few Konkani words related to agriculture find their roots in Proto-Australoid dialects, e. g.: kumeri-type of farming, mer-field boundary, zonn-share of the surplus production, khazan-type of farm land, kudd-room, body, khomp-hut. These tribes from Konkan speaking early Dravidian languages ( see: Kurukh language ) are believed to be the Mediterraneans. Historians ( Sbjobreg1990: 48 ) maintain that the paleo-Mediterraneans who came to India from north-west passes as early Dravidians formed a heterogeneous racial sub-type. These Mediterraneans or Dravidians as many historians call them, knew the craft of systematized agriculture, and inhabited most of the neolithic India.

Historians and literary historians today condemn Baylebridge's political agenda of populist nationalism ( cf Jupp ), as well as his interest in vitalism.

Historians today debate whether the revolutionaries were truly loyal to the Spanish crown or whether the declaration of fidelity to the king was a necessary ruse to conceal the true objective — to achieve independence — from a population that was not yet ready to accept such a radical change.

Historians today call this elite's brief courtship with sovereignty the Ephemeral Independence.

Historians have become very reluctant to classify other societies into European models and today it is rare for Indian history to be described as feudal by academics ; it still done in popular usage, however, but only for pejorative reasons to express disfavour, typically by critics.

Historians consider this the decisive factor in convincing Alboin to undertake a migration, even though there are indications that before the war with the Gepids a decision was maturing to leave for Italy, a country thousands of Lombards had seen in the 550s when hired by the Byzantines to fight in the Gothic War.

Historians are divided on the detail of Ælle's life and existence as it was during the least-documented period in English history of the last two millennia.

Historians are concerned with the continuous, methodical narrative and research of past events as relating to the human race ; as well as the study of all history in time.

Apparently, Art Historians faces the facts that there are no contemporary documents to help them certify his date of birth, birthplace, and family background – there have been theories and these are the most accepted – he was born in 1753, probably Edo, and his father was an owner of a Tea-house.

Historians are unsure at what point wrestling changed from competitive catch wrestling into worked entertainment.

Historians are divided about what followed: some argue that the takeover of southern Great Britain by the Anglo-Saxons was peaceful.

Historians are in disagreement with how much Jefferson was committed to the anti-slavery cause.

Historians are paying increasing attention to less conventional sources, such as poetry in his praise and manuscripts associated with his name.

Historians have been struck by the correspondence with names in Fagrskinna, which says that two of the kings who died with Eirik in his final battle against Olaf were called Harékr and Ragnvald, although they are not identified as relatives.

The New Historians (, HaHistoryonim HaHadashim ) are a loosely-defined group of Israeli historians who have challenged traditional versions of Israeli history, including Israel's role in the Palestinian Exodus in 1948 and Arab willingness to discuss peace.

" Historians are undecided if Lincoln actually said this line, and in a letter that Stowe wrote to her husband a few hours after meeting with Lincoln no mention of this comment was made.

Historians are unsure what the name means.

Historians are divided over whether or not Rosamund's relationship with the King produced children.

Historians are divided on whether or not Edward ever had an official that could be called a chancellor, but they are agreed that Leofric did not hold such an office.

Historians find many arguments against this location, but are unable to agree on a better one.

Historians are uncertain of the source of Galloway Township's name.

" Historians are not yet agreed on the exact role of the societies " in the Whiskey Rebellion, wrote historian Mark Spencer in 2003, " but there was a degree of overlap between society membership and the Whiskey Rebels ".

Historians generally contend that the Coharie are descendants of the Algonquian-speaking Neusiok and Coree, as well as the Iroquoian Tuscarora, and the Siouan Waccamaw, who occupied what is now the central portion of North Carolina.

Historians Thomas F. Glick and Bernard S. Bachrach are less sceptical.

Historians are still skeptical as to whether Ryti's Freemasonry influenced his political actions.

Historians have noted the similarities between the events leading to the First Samnite War and events which according to Thucydides caused the Peloponnesian War, but there are differences as well.

Historians are well aware that diaries are often written with a view to later publication.

Historians seem to be unsure about Alexander ’ s behavior when it came to his relations with Mongols.

Historians are unsure where the first lock was invented, but evidence suggests that locks initially developed independently in the Egyptian, Greek, and Roman civilizations.

Historians are unsure if the street originally honored Louis Marshall, who only reached prominence after the turn of the twentieth century.

Historians are unsure how serious he was about this, and some have speculated that he may have done it to make Madison's plan look moderate by comparison.

Historians disagree as to whether the army returned to Ireland in 866, 867 or even in 869.

Historians have debated whether Hume posited a universal unchanging human nature, or allowed for evolution and development.

Historians question whether the Roman government distinguished between Christians and Jews prior to Nerva's modification of the Fiscus Judaicus in 96 ( Jews paid the tax, Christians did not ).

Historians debate whether or not Washington preferred a Fabian strategy to harass the British with quick, sharp attacks followed by a retreat so the larger British army could not catch him, or whether he preferred to fight major battles.

Historians debate whether the decision to form a separate country was initiated by Stalin or by the SED.

Historians debate whether the dramatic changes merely reflect long-term trends that were more-or-less inevitable, or whether government intervention played the decisive role in changing the goals and roles of the chiefs.

Historians generally agree that the middle classes held high personal moral standards ( and usually followed them ), but have debated whether the working classes followed suit.

Historians have debated whether the " long depression " of the late 19th century stifled investment, but the New Zealanders found a way around adverse conditions.

Historians disagree over whether that is true.

Historians have debated whether the Pequot migrated about 1500 from the upper Hudson River Valley toward what is now central and eastern Connecticut.

Historians have speculated whether the division between Edward and Thomas began at that time, as Thomas unsurprisingly began to resent his brother and the relationship between them began to dissolve.

Historians debate whether he was " America's first domestic terrorist ".

Historians disagree on whether any or all of the book has been falsified.

Historians disagree on whether Crispus Attucks was a free man or an escaped slave ; but agree that he was of Wampanoag and African descent.

Historians speculate as to whether, had Parnell lived, the enactment of All-Ireland Home Rule with the consent of all of Ulster and its inclusion in an All-Ireland parliament, could have taken place.

Historians have also discussed the motives of the Cavite government to replace Bonifacio, and whether it had the right to do so.

Historians debate Smith's motivation, whether it was a cynical attempt to defeat the bill by someone opposed to both civil rights for blacks and women, or an attempt to support their rights by broadening the bill to include women.

Historians have debated whether this last point was fully understood by chiefs due to the possible mistranslation of the word " sovereignty " in the treaty copies.

Historians dispute whether his fierce opposition to Zionism was grounded in nationalism or antisemitism or a combination of both.

Historians disagree as to whether Van der Lubbe acted alone or whether the arson was planned and ordered by the Nazis, then dominant in the government themselves, as a false flag operation.